These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26162255)

  • 1. Evaluation of an Innovative Digital Assessment Tool in Dental Anatomy.
    Lam MT; Kwon SR; Qian F; Denehy GE
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 May; 16(5):366-71. PubMed ID: 26162255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Computer-Assisted Learning on Students' Dental Anatomy Waxing Performance.
    Kwon SR; Hernández M; Blanchette DR; Lam MT; Gratton DG; Aquilino SA
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1093-100. PubMed ID: 26329034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between students' self-assessment, and visual and digital assessment techniques in dental anatomy wax-up grading.
    Abdalla R; Bishop SS; Villasante-Tezanos AG; Bertoli E
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2021 Aug; 25(3):524-535. PubMed ID: 33188546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dental anatomy grading: comparison between conventional visual and a novel digital assessment technique.
    Kwon SR; Restrepo-Kennedy N; Dawson DV; Hernandez M; Denehy G; Blanchette D; Gratton DG; Aquilino SA; Armstrong SR
    J Dent Educ; 2014 Dec; 78(12):1655-62. PubMed ID: 25480281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Dental Students' Self-Directed, Faculty, and Software-Based Assessments of Dental Anatomy Wax-Ups: A Retrospective Study.
    Garrett PH; Faraone KL; Patzelt SB; Keaser ML
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Dec; 79(12):1437-44. PubMed ID: 26632298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inter- and Intrarater Reliability Using Different Software Versions of E4D Compare in Dental Education.
    Callan RS; Cooper JR; Young NB; Mollica AG; Furness AR; Looney SW
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Jun; 79(6):711-8. PubMed ID: 26034037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of Digital Tooth Preparation Evaluation Technology on Preclinical Dental Students' Technical and Self-Evaluation Skills.
    Gratton DG; Kwon SR; Blanchette D; Aquilino SA
    J Dent Educ; 2016 Jan; 80(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 26729689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Utilizing self-assessment software to evaluate student wax-ups in dental morphology.
    McPherson KR; Mennito AS; Vuthiganon J; Kritzas YG; McKinney RA; Wolf BJ; Renne WG
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Jun; 79(6):697-704. PubMed ID: 26034035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of two dental simulation systems: virtual reality versus contemporary non-computer-assisted.
    Jasinevicius TR; Landers M; Nelson S; Urbankova A
    J Dent Educ; 2004 Nov; 68(11):1151-62. PubMed ID: 15520234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Validity of Using E4D Compare's "% Comparison" to Assess Crown Preparations in Preclinical Dental Education.
    Callan RS; Haywood VB; Cooper JR; Furness AR; Looney SW
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Dec; 79(12):1445-51. PubMed ID: 26632299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dental students' opinions of preparation assessment with E4D compare software versus traditional methods.
    Hamil LM; Mennito AS; Renné WG; Vuthiganon J
    J Dent Educ; 2014 Oct; 78(10):1424-31. PubMed ID: 25281676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Role of Digital 3D Scanned Models in Dental Students' Self-Assessments in Preclinical Operative Dentistry.
    Lee C; Kobayashi H; Lee SR; Ohyama H
    J Dent Educ; 2018 Apr; 82(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 29606657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of Employing Different Typodonts When Using E4D Compare for Dental Student Assessment.
    Callan RS; Cooper JR; Young NB; Mollica AG; Furness AR; Looney SW
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Jun; 79(6):705-10. PubMed ID: 26034036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dental anatomy carving computer-assisted instruction program: an assessment of student performance and perceptions.
    Nance ET; Lanning SK; Gunsolley JC
    J Dent Educ; 2009 Aug; 73(8):972-9. PubMed ID: 19648568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Utilizing CAD/CAM to Measure Total Occlusal Convergence of Preclinical Dental Students' Crown Preparations.
    Mays KA; Crisp HA; Vos P
    J Dent Educ; 2016 Jan; 80(1):100-7. PubMed ID: 26729690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Grading Class I Preparations in Preclinical Dental Education: E4D Compare Software vs. the Traditional Standard.
    Sly MM; Barros JA; Streckfus CF; Arriaga DM; Patel SA
    J Dent Educ; 2017 Dec; 81(12):1457-1462. PubMed ID: 29196334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dental Students' Perceptions of Digital Assessment Software for Preclinical Tooth Preparation Exercises.
    Park CF; Sheinbaum JM; Tamada Y; Chandiramani R; Lian L; Lee C; Da Silva J; Ishikawa-Nagai S
    J Dent Educ; 2017 May; 81(5):597-603. PubMed ID: 28461637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of a Self-Instructional Radiographic Anatomy Module for Dental Hygiene Faculty Calibration.
    Brame JL; AlGheithy DS; Platin E; Mitchell SH
    J Dent Hyg; 2017 Jun; 91(3):5-13. PubMed ID: 29118066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A computer program to aid in visual concept development in dentistry.
    Wallen ES; Schulein TM; Johnson LA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1997 Feb; 52(2):105-15. PubMed ID: 9034675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The LINDSAY Virtual Human Project: an immersive approach to anatomy and physiology.
    Tworek JK; Jamniczky HA; Jacob C; Hallgrímsson B; Wright B
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 22791664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.