304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26162414)
1. Delayed Auditory Brainstem Responses in Prelingually Deaf and Late-Implanted Cochlear Implant Users.
Lammers MJ; van Eijl RH; van Zanten GA; Versnel H; Grolman W
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Oct; 16(5):669-78. PubMed ID: 26162414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children.
Thai-Van H; Cozma S; Boutitie F; Disant F; Truy E; Collet L
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):676-89. PubMed ID: 17223382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Altered cortical activity in prelingually deafened cochlear implant users following long periods of auditory deprivation.
Lammers MJ; Versnel H; van Zanten GA; Grolman W
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Feb; 16(1):159-70. PubMed ID: 25315357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children.
Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 118(8):1671-84. PubMed ID: 17588811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interaural stimulation timing in single sided deaf cochlear implant users.
Zirn S; Arndt S; Aschendorff A; Wesarg T
Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():148-56. PubMed ID: 26302945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of modulating phase duration on electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses obtained during cochlear implantation.
Bonne NX; Douchement D; Hosana G; Desruelles J; Fayoux P; Ruzza I; Vincent C
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 May; 16(3):168-74. PubMed ID: 25167217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic value of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in cochlear implantation.
Lundin K; Stillesjö F; Rask-Andersen H
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16(5):254-61. PubMed ID: 25798647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? (1): On electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses.
Guiraud J; Gallego S; Arnold L; Boyle P; Truy E; Collet L
Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):48-60. PubMed ID: 17157463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of device use after sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children: An electrophysiological approach.
Sparreboom M; Beynon AJ; Snik AF; Mylanus EA
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Jul; 86():161-6. PubMed ID: 27260600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation between electrical auditory brainstem response and perceptual thresholds in Digisonic cochlear implant users.
Truy E; Gallego S; Chanal JM; Collet L; Morgon A
Laryngoscope; 1998 Apr; 108(4 Pt 1):554-9. PubMed ID: 9546269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 response.
Firszt JB; Chambers RD; Kraus And N; Reeder RM
Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):502-15. PubMed ID: 12476088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brain stem in children who use cochlear implants.
Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):485-500. PubMed ID: 14663348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Cochlear Implant Performance Prognostic Test Based on Electrical Field Interactions Evaluated by eABR (Electrical Auditory Brainstem Responses).
Guevara N; Hoen M; Truy E; Gallego S
PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155008. PubMed ID: 27149268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of increasing duration of stimulation on the electrically evoked auditory brainstem and middle latency responses in pediatric cochlear implant users.
Davids T; Valero J; Papsin BC; Harrison RV; Gordon KA
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Aug; 37(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 19128593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationships between bilateral auditory brainstem activity and inter-implant interval in children with cochlear implants.
Wu YL; Chen L; Zhu HY; Luo WY; Shi K; Hou XY; Sun JW; Sun JQ; Guo XT
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Apr; 281(4):1735-1743. PubMed ID: 37924365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relation between electric auditory brain stem and cognitive responses and speech perception in cochlear implant users.
Groenen PA; Makhdoum M; van den Brink JL; Stollman MH; Snik AF; van den Broek P
Acta Otolaryngol; 1996 Nov; 116(6):785-90. PubMed ID: 8973707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An evoked potential study of the developmental time course of the auditory nerve and brainstem in children using cochlear implants.
Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11(1):7-23. PubMed ID: 16219994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Extracochlear Stimulation of Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses (eABRs) Remains the Preferred Pre-implant Auditory Nerve Function Test in an Assessor-blinded Comparison.
Causon A; O'Driscoll M; Stapleton E; Lloyd S; Freeman S; Munro KJ
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jan; 40(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 30489452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in deaf patients with Mondini malformation during cochlear implantation.
Zhu HY; Chen L; Hou XY; Tang ZQ; Sun JQ; Sun JW; Guo XT
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Oct; 279(10):4847-4852. PubMed ID: 35247096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electrically evoked auditory middle latency responses versus perception abilities in cochlear implant users.
Groenen P; Snik A; van den Broek P
Audiology; 1997; 36(2):83-97. PubMed ID: 9099406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
