239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26162450)
1. Exploring the feasibility of smart phone microphone for measurement of acoustic voice parameters and voice pathology screening.
Uloza V; Padervinskis E; Vegiene A; Pribuisiene R; Saferis V; Vaiciukynas E; Gelzinis A; Verikas A
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Nov; 272(11):3391-9. PubMed ID: 26162450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combined Use of Standard and Throat Microphones for Measurement of Acoustic Voice Parameters and Voice Categorization.
Uloza V; Padervinskis E; Uloziene I; Saferis V; Verikas A
J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 25795349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exploring the feasibility of the combination of acoustic voice quality index and glottal function index for voice pathology screening.
Ulozaite-Staniene N; Petrauskas T; Šaferis V; Uloza V
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Jun; 276(6):1737-1745. PubMed ID: 31016388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Glottal function index questionnaire for screening of pediatric dysphonia.
Pribuisiene R; Pribuisis K; Liutkevicius V; Balsevicius T; Milasiene R; Uloza V
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Aug; 123():97-101. PubMed ID: 31085464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An Innovative Voice Analyzer "VA" Smart Phone Program for Quantitative Analysis of Voice Quality.
Kojima T; Fujimura S; Hori R; Okanoue Y; Shoji K; Inoue M
J Voice; 2019 Sep; 33(5):642-648. PubMed ID: 29801970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Captured With a Smartphone - Measurements With Added Ambient Noise.
Uloza V; Ulozaitė-Stanienė N; Petrauskas T; Kregždytė R
J Voice; 2023 May; 37(3):465.e19-465.e26. PubMed ID: 33676807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Study on the concordance of objective multi-parameters analysis and perceptual evaluation].
Yu P; Wang G; Zhang GJ; Tang AR; Wang RG
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Oct; 47(10):817-22. PubMed ID: 23302162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing voice health using smartphones: bias and random error of acoustic voice parameters captured by different smartphone types.
Jannetts S; Schaeffler F; Beck J; Cowen S
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2019 Mar; 54(2):292-305. PubMed ID: 30779425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Acoustic Analyses of Voice in Nonoptimized Conditions.
van der Woerd B; Wu M; Parsa V; Doyle PC; Fung K
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Dec; 63(12):3991-3999. PubMed ID: 33186510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Are smartphones and low-cost external microphones comparable for measuring time-domain acoustic parameters?
Ceylan ME; Cangi ME; Yılmaz G; Peru BS; Yiğit Ö
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Dec; 280(12):5433-5444. PubMed ID: 37584753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A computer system for acoustic analysis of pathological voices and laryngeal diseases screening.
Hadjitodorov S; Mitev P
Med Eng Phys; 2002 Jul; 24(6):419-29. PubMed ID: 12135650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Objective multi-parameters analysis of the voice dysphonia].
Yu P; Wang G; Han B; Yang W; Han D
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Dec; 18(12):751-4. PubMed ID: 15831052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the Acoustic Parameters Obtained With Different Smartphones and a Professional Microphone.
Marsano-Cornejo MJ; Roco-Videla Á
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed); 2022; 73(1):51-55. PubMed ID: 35190088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Smartphones Offer New Opportunities in Clinical Voice Research.
Manfredi C; Lebacq J; Cantarella G; Schoentgen J; Orlandi S; Bandini A; DeJonckere PH
J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):111.e1-111.e7. PubMed ID: 27068549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Study on self-assessment, acoustic analysis, laryngoscopy for patients with voice surgery].
Yu Z; Pang Z
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Nov; 24(21):980-2, 986. PubMed ID: 21261018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproducibility of Voice Parameters: The Effect of Room Acoustics and Microphones.
Bottalico P; Codino J; Cantor-Cutiva LC; Marks K; Nudelman CJ; Skeffington J; Shrivastav R; Jackson-Menaldi MC; Hunter EJ; Rubin AD
J Voice; 2020 May; 34(3):320-334. PubMed ID: 30471944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mobile Digital Recording: Adequacy of the iRig and iOS Device for Acoustic and Perceptual Analysis of Normal Voice.
Oliveira G; Fava G; Baglione M; Pimpinella M
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 27423820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity of Acoustic Measures Obtained Using Various Recording Methods Including Smartphones With and Without Headset Microphones.
Awan SN; Bahr R; Watts S; Boyer M; Budinsky R; ; Bensoussan Y
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Jun; 67(6):1712-1730. PubMed ID: 38749007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Objective voice analysis for dysphonic patients: a multiparametric protocol including acoustic and aerodynamic measurements.
Yu P; Ouaknine M; Revis J; Giovanni A
J Voice; 2001 Dec; 15(4):529-42. PubMed ID: 11792029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mobile Communication Devices, Ambient Noise, and Acoustic Voice Measures.
Maryn Y; Ysenbaert F; Zarowski A; Vanspauwen R
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):248.e11-248.e23. PubMed ID: 27692682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
