166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26163347)
1. Sensitivity of the Oxford Foot Model to marker misplacement: A systematic single-case investigation.
Carty CP; Walsh HP; Gillett JG
Gait Posture; 2015 Sep; 42(3):398-401. PubMed ID: 26163347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cranio-caudal and medio-lateral navicular translation are representative surrogate measures of foot function in asymptomatic adults during walking.
Eichelberger P; Pohl J; Jaspers T; Ferraro M; Krause F; Baur H
PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208175. PubMed ID: 30517158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determination of relationship between foot arch, hindfoot, and hallux motion using Oxford foot model: Comparison between walking and running.
Shono H; Matsumoto Y; Kokubun T; Tsuruta A; Miyazawa T; Kobayashi A; Kanemura N
Gait Posture; 2022 Feb; 92():96-102. PubMed ID: 34839207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Repeatability of the modified Oxford foot model during gait in healthy adults.
Wright CJ; Arnold BL; Coffey TG; Pidcoe PE
Gait Posture; 2011 Jan; 33(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 21081275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pathophysiology of juvenile idiopathic arthritis induced pes planovalgus in static and walking condition: a functional view using 3D gait analysis.
Merker J; Hartmann M; Kreuzpointner F; Schwirtz A; Haas JP
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J; 2015 Jun; 13():21. PubMed ID: 26058561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of different step lengths at a preferred walking speed on forefoot, midfoot, and hindfoot motion in healthy young adults.
Lovekin EM; Buddhadev HH; Robey NJ; Chalmers GR
J Biomech; 2024 May; 168():112117. PubMed ID: 38669796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marker placement sensitivity of the Oxford and Rizzoli foot models in adults and children.
Schallig W; van den Noort JC; Maas M; Harlaar J; van der Krogt MM
J Biomech; 2021 Sep; 126():110629. PubMed ID: 34320419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing the kinematic output of the Oxford and Rizzoli Foot Models during normal gait and voluntary pathological gait in healthy adults.
Schallig W; van den Noort JC; McCahill J; Stebbins J; Leardini A; Maas M; Harlaar J; van der Krogt MM
Gait Posture; 2020 Oct; 82():126-132. PubMed ID: 32920448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A robotic cadaveric flatfoot analysis of stance phase.
Jackson LT; Aubin PM; Cowley MS; Sangeorzan BJ; Ledoux WR
J Biomech Eng; 2011 May; 133(5):051005. PubMed ID: 21599096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of arch height on kinematic coupling during walking.
Wilken J; Rao S; Saltzman C; Yack HJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Mar; 26(3):318-23. PubMed ID: 21074913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Foot and ankle kinematics and ground reaction forces during ambulation.
Kitaoka HB; Crevoisier XM; Hansen D; Katajarvi B; Harbst K; Kaufman KR
Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Oct; 27(10):808-13. PubMed ID: 17054883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A multi-segment kinematic model of the foot with a novel definition of forefoot motion for use in clinical gait analysis during walking.
Jenkyn TR; Nicol AC
J Biomech; 2007; 40(14):3271-8. PubMed ID: 17610881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Repeatability of a model for measuring multi-segment foot kinematics in children.
Stebbins J; Harrington M; Thompson N; Zavatsky A; Theologis T
Gait Posture; 2006 Jun; 23(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 15914005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Repeatability of the Oxford Foot Model: Comparison of a team of assessors with different backgrounds and no prior experience of the Oxford Foot Model.
Reay J; Leboeuf F; Hanssen B; Chiu J; Jones R
Gait Posture; 2022 Feb; 92():191-198. PubMed ID: 34864484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Foot modeling affects ankle sagittal plane kinematics during jump-landing.
Azevedo AM; Oliveira R; Vaz JR; Cortes N
J Biomech; 2019 Nov; 96():109337. PubMed ID: 31547999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Oxford foot model kinematics in landings: A comparison between professional dancers and non-dancers.
Azevedo AM; Oliveira R; Vaz JR; Cortes N
J Sci Med Sport; 2020 Apr; 23(4):347-352. PubMed ID: 31734168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of subtalar joint motion during anticipated medial cutting turns and level walking using a multi-segment foot model.
Jenkyn TR; Shultz R; Giffin JR; Birmingham TB
Gait Posture; 2010 Feb; 31(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 19897368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Segmental kinematic analysis of planovalgus feet during walking in children with cerebral palsy.
Kruger KM; Konop KA; Krzak JJ; Graf A; Altiok H; Smith PA; Harris GF
Gait Posture; 2017 May; 54():277-283. PubMed ID: 28384608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The relationship between ankle, hindfoot, and forefoot position and posterior tibial muscle excursion.
Flemister AS; Neville CG; Houck J
Foot Ankle Int; 2007 Apr; 28(4):448-55. PubMed ID: 17475139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do different multi-segment foot models detect the same changes in kinematics when wearing foot orthoses?
Klein T; Chapman GJ; Lastovicka O; Janura M; Richards J
J Foot Ankle Res; 2022 Sep; 15(1):68. PubMed ID: 36071489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
