These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26163676)

  • 1. Hearing Aid-Induced Plasticity in the Auditory System of Older Adults: Evidence From Speech Perception.
    Lavie L; Banai K; Karni A; Attias J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 58(5):1601-10. PubMed ID: 26163676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Semi-structured listening experience (listening training) in hearing aid fitting: influence on dichotic listening.
    Lavie L; Attias J; Karni A
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 22(2):347-50. PubMed ID: 24096865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How difficult is difficult? Speech perception in noise in the elderly hearing impaired.
    Lavie L; Banai K; Attias J; Karni A
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2014 Sep; 25(3):313-6. PubMed ID: 25153230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acclimatization to hearing aids.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 24351612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory acclimatization and hearing aids: late auditory evoked potentials and speech recognition following unilateral and bilateral amplification.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):3560-9. PubMed ID: 24907819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
    Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of prolonged lack of amplification on speech-recognition performance: preliminary findings.
    Silman S; Silverman CA; Emmer MB; Gelfand SA
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 8126657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of wireless and acoustic hearing aid-based telephone listening strategies.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(2):209-20. PubMed ID: 20808225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses as an Objective Aided Outcome Measure: Effect of Stimulus Level, Bandwidth, and Amplification in Adults With Hearing Loss.
    Easwar V; Purcell DW; Aiken SJ; Parsa V; Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):635-52. PubMed ID: 26226606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Comparison of Personal Sound Amplification Products and Hearing Aids in Ecologically Relevant Test Environments.
    Brody L; Wu YH; Stangl E
    Am J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 27(4):581-593. PubMed ID: 30458521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of automatic signal-processing amplification on speech recognition in noise for persons with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Dempsey JJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1987; 96(3 Pt 1):251-3. PubMed ID: 3605946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech perception enhancement in elderly hearing aid users using an auditory training program for mobile devices.
    Yu J; Jeon H; Song C; Han W
    Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2017 Jan; 17(1):61-68. PubMed ID: 26628069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
    Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Right-Ear Advantage for Unaided and Aided Speech Perception in Noise in Older Adults.
    Behtani L; Fuente A; Ianiszewski A; Osman RA
    J Int Adv Otol; 2021 Mar; 17(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 33893780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The time course and magnitude of perceptual acclimatization to frequency responses: evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids.
    Gatehouse S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1258-68. PubMed ID: 1401514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unilateral versus bilateral amplification for adults with impaired hearing.
    Walden TC; Walden BE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Sep; 16(8):574-84. PubMed ID: 16295244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.