242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26163992)
1. Does a novel penalized likelihood reconstruction of 18F-FDG PET-CT improve signal-to-background in colorectal liver metastases?
Parvizi N; Franklin JM; McGowan DR; Teoh EJ; Bradley KM; Gleeson FV
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 84(10):1873-8. PubMed ID: 26163992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The value of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction for improving lesion conspicuity of malignant lung tumors on
Kurita Y; Ichikawa Y; Nakanishi T; Tomita Y; Hasegawa D; Murashima S; Hirano T; Sakuma H
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Apr; 34(4):272-279. PubMed ID: 32060780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Novel penalised likelihood reconstruction of PET in the assessment of histologically verified small pulmonary nodules.
Teoh EJ; McGowan DR; Bradley KM; Belcher E; Black E; Gleeson FV
Eur Radiol; 2016 Feb; 26(2):576-84. PubMed ID: 25991490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Changes of [
Liu Y; Gao MJ; Zhou J; Du F; Chen L; Huang ZK; Hu JB; Lou C
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Sep; 21(1):133. PubMed ID: 34530768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 18F-FDG PET/CT assessment of histopathologically confirmed mediastinal lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer using a penalised likelihood reconstruction.
Teoh EJ; McGowan DR; Bradley KM; Belcher E; Black E; Moore A; Sykes A; Gleeson FV
Eur Radiol; 2016 Nov; 26(11):4098-4106. PubMed ID: 26914696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation and Optimization of a New PET Reconstruction Algorithm, Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction, for Lung Cancer Assessment According to Lesion Size.
Otani T; Hosono M; Kanagaki M; Onishi Y; Matsubara N; Kawabata K; Kimura H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Aug; 213(2):W50-W56. PubMed ID: 30995096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of quantitative whole body PET parameters on [
Ayati N; McIntosh L; Buteau J; Alipour R; Pudis M; Daw N; Jackson P; Hofman MS
Cancer Imaging; 2024 May; 24(1):57. PubMed ID: 38711135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A clinical evaluation of the impact of the Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm on PET FDG metrics.
Vallot D; Caselles O; Chaltiel L; Fernandez A; Gabiache E; Dierickx L; Zerdoud S; Bauriaud M; Courbon F
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Nov; 38(11):979-984. PubMed ID: 29045338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Penalized-Likelihood Estimation Reconstruction on a Digital Time-of-Flight PET/CT Scanner for
Lindström E; Sundin A; Trampal C; Lindsjö L; Ilan E; Danfors T; Antoni G; Sörensen J; Lubberink M
J Nucl Med; 2018 Jul; 59(7):1152-1158. PubMed ID: 29449445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bayesian penalised likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) of
Teoh EJ; McGowan DR; Schuster DM; Tsakok MT; Gleeson FV; Bradley KM
Br J Radiol; 2018 May; 91(1085):20170727. PubMed ID: 29303359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of a Bayesian Penalized Likelihood PET Reconstruction Compared With Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization on Clinical Image Quality Over a Wide Range of Patient Weights.
Chilcott AK; Bradley KM; McGowan DR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):153-157. PubMed ID: 29091008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determination of optimal regularization factor in Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction of brain PET images using [
Wagatsuma K; Miwa K; Kamitaka Y; Koike E; Yamao T; Yoshii T; Kobayashi R; Nezu S; Sugamata Y; Miyaji N; Imabayashi E; Ishibashi K; Toyohara J; Ishii K
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):2995-3005. PubMed ID: 35246870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ordered subset expectation maximisation vs Bayesian penalised likelihood reconstruction algorithm in 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT.
Witkowska-Patena E; Budzyńska A; Giżewska A; Dziuk M; Walęcka-Mazur A
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Mar; 34(3):192-199. PubMed ID: 31902120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Phantom and Clinical Evaluation of the Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm Q.Clear on an LYSO PET/CT System.
Teoh EJ; McGowan DR; Macpherson RE; Bradley KM; Gleeson FV
J Nucl Med; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1447-52. PubMed ID: 26159585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of a block sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm in 18F-FDG PET/CT studies.
Sah BR; Stolzmann P; Delso G; Wollenweber SD; Hüllner M; Hakami YA; Queiroz MA; Barbosa FG; von Schulthess GK; Pietsch C; Veit-Haibach P
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jan; 38(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 27755394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of time-of-flight technique on the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT for assessment of lymph node metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Li CY; Klohr S; Sadick H; Weiss C; Hoermann K; Schoenberg SO; Sadick M
J Nucl Med Technol; 2014 Sep; 42(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 24970897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative comparison between regularized time-of-flight and OSEM PET reconstructions for small 18F-FDG-avid lesions.
Chism CB; Ravizzini GC; Macapinlac HA; Pan T
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jun; 38(6):529-536. PubMed ID: 28383318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of time of flight and point spread function on quantitative parameters of lung lesions in
Huang K; Feng Y; Liang W; Li L
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Nov; 21(1):169. PubMed ID: 34773998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reproducibility of functional volume and activity concentration in 18F-FDG PET/CT of liver metastases in colorectal cancer.
Heijmen L; de Geus-Oei LF; de Wilt JH; Visvikis D; Hatt M; Visser EP; Bussink J; Punt CJ; Oyen WJ; van Laarhoven HW
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2012 Dec; 39(12):1858-67. PubMed ID: 22945372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimizing scan time and bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm in copper-64 PET/CT imaging: a phantom study.
Monsef A; Sheikhzadeh P; Steiner JR; Sadeghi F; Yazdani M; Ghafarian P
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 May; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 38608316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
