75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26164295)
21. Visual inspection of the uterine cervix after the application of acetic acid in the detection of cervical carcinoma and its precursors.
Sankaranarayanan R; Wesley R; Somanathan T; Dhakad N; Shyamalakumary B; Amma NS; Parkin DM; Nair MK
Cancer; 1998 Nov; 83(10):2150-6. PubMed ID: 9827719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Interpretation of colposcopy in population-based cervical screening services in north-eastern Italy: an online interregional agreement study.
Garutti P; Cristiani P; Fantin GP; Sopracordevole F; Costa S; Schincaglia P; Ravaioli A; Sassoli de Bianchi P; Naldoni C; Ferretti S; Bucchi L
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Nov; 206():64-69. PubMed ID: 27639133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Digital photography in skin cancer screening by mobile units in remote areas of Brazil.
Silveira CE; Silva TB; Fregnani JH; da Costa Vieira RA; Haikel RL; Syrjänen K; Carvalho AL; Mauad EC
BMC Dermatol; 2014 Dec; 14():19. PubMed ID: 25539949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Visual inspection for cervical cancer screening: evaluation by doctor versus paramedical worker.
Bhatla N; Mukhopadhyay A; Joshi S; Kumar A; Kriplani A; Pandey RM; Verma K
Indian J Cancer; 2004; 41(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 15105577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Study on the value assessment of various screening programs regarding cervical cancer screening strategy in the rural areas of China].
Li LY; Qiao ZQ; Zhang MF; Yang JP; Bao YP; An YT; Lei J; Xiong NH; Yu XH; Zhang X; Pan QJ; Qiao YL
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 28(10):964-7. PubMed ID: 18399140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Interpretation of p16(INK4a) /Ki-67 dual immunostaining for the triage of human papillomavirus-positive women by experts and nonexperts in cervical cytology.
Allia E; Ronco G; Coccia A; Luparia P; Macrì L; Fiorito C; Maletta F; Deambrogio C; Tunesi S; De Marco L; Gillio-Tos A; Sapino A; Ghiringhello B
Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Apr; 123(4):212-8. PubMed ID: 25534957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of visual inspection and Papanicolau (PAP) smears for cervical cancer screening in Honduras: should PAP smears be abandoned?
Perkins RB; Langrish SM; Stern LJ; Figueroa J; Simon CJ
Trop Med Int Health; 2007 Sep; 12(9):1018-25. PubMed ID: 17875013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Early detection of cervical cancer through acetic acid application--an aided visual inspection.
Singh V; Sehgal A; Parashari A; Sodhani P; Satyanarayana L
Singapore Med J; 2001 Aug; 42(8):351-4. PubMed ID: 11764051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Andriod Device-Based Cervical Cancer Screening for Resource-Poor Settings.
Kudva V; Prasad K; Guruvare S
J Digit Imaging; 2018 Oct; 31(5):646-654. PubMed ID: 29777323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [The value of screening using cervicography in dysplasia and neoplasms of the uterine cervix].
Coibion M; Guenier C; Miloiu A; Andry M; Bonnal JL; Nogaret JM
Rev Med Brux; 1990; 11(1-2):16-20. PubMed ID: 2406832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Agreement of colposcope and gynocular in assessment of cervical lesions by swede score: a randomized, crossover pilot trial.
Ngonzi J; Bajunirwe F; Wistrand C; Mayanja R; Altman D; Thorsell M; Wikström Shemer EA
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2013 Oct; 17(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 23645068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. International Image Concordance Study to Compare a Point-of-Care Tampon Colposcope With a Standard-of-Care Colposcope.
Mueller JL; Asma E; Lam CT; Krieger MS; Gallagher JE; Erkanli A; Hariprasad R; Malliga JS; Muasher LC; Mchome B; Oneko O; Taylor P; Venegas G; Wanyoro A; Mehrotra R; Schmitt JW; Ramanujam N
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2017 Apr; 21(2):112-119. PubMed ID: 28263237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Digital cervicography for cervical cancer screening in low-resource settings: A scoping review.
Chongsuwat T; Wang C; Sohn Y; Klump K
Gynecol Oncol Rep; 2023 Feb; 45():101130. PubMed ID: 36683777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Digital images for interobserver variability comparison in cervicovaginal cytology.
Tinacci G; Cariaggi MP; Carozzi F; Foggi A; Miccinesi G; Mirri F; Pasquini P; Zappa M; Confortini M
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2003 Feb; 25(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 12630075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Modified Cervicography and Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid as an Alternative Screening Method for Cervical Precancerous Lesions.
Purwoto G; Dianika HD; Putra A; Purbadi S; Nuranna L
J Cancer Prev; 2017 Dec; 22(4):254-259. PubMed ID: 29302584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cervicography--a new approach to cervical cancer detection.
Stafl A
Gynecol Oncol; 1981 Oct; 12(2 Pt 2):S292-301. PubMed ID: 7308861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. A standardized grading system for scleritis.
Sen HN; Sangave AA; Goldstein DA; Suhler EB; Cunningham D; Vitale S; Nussenblatt RB
Ophthalmology; 2011 Apr; 118(4):768-71. PubMed ID: 21093921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on an urban cervical cancer screening program in West Cameroon.
Sormani J; Datchoua AM; Petignat P; Kenfack B; Schmidt NC
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Sep; 31(9):1297-1298. PubMed ID: 33712454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Intra-/Interobserver Agreement of Enhancement Pattern for Pancreatic Head Lesions Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: According to EFSUMB Guidelines.
Grossjohann HS; Ewertsen C; Svendsen LB; Nielsen MB
Diagnostics (Basel); 2012 Apr; 2(2):2-9. PubMed ID: 26859393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Interobserver agreement in using a checklist for the safe administration of enteral nutrition].
Rigatti Silva SM; Almeida Corrêa AP; Dornelles Santarém M; de Assis MCS; Gomes Beghetto M
Nutr Hosp; 2021 Oct; 38(5):903-910. PubMed ID: 34251269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
