BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26164494)

  • 1. Longer Withdrawal Time Is Associated With a Reduced Incidence of Interval Cancer After Screening Colonoscopy.
    Shaukat A; Rector TS; Church TR; Lederle FA; Kim AS; Rank JM; Allen JI
    Gastroenterology; 2015 Oct; 149(4):952-7. PubMed ID: 26164494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors Associated With Shorter Colonoscopy Surveillance Intervals for Patients With Low-Risk Colorectal Adenomas and Effects on Outcome.
    Anderson JC; Baron JA; Ahnen DJ; Barry EL; Bostick RM; Burke CA; Bresalier RS; Church TR; Cole BF; Cruz-Correa M; Kim AS; Mott LA; Sandler RS; Robertson DJ
    Gastroenterology; 2017 Jun; 152(8):1933-1943.e5. PubMed ID: 28219690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.
    Barclay RL; Vicari JJ; Doughty AS; Johanson JF; Greenlaw RL
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Dec; 355(24):2533-41. PubMed ID: 17167136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monitoring colonoscopy withdrawal time significantly improves the adenoma detection rate and the performance of endoscopists.
    Vavricka SR; Sulz MC; Degen L; Rechner R; Manz M; Biedermann L; Beglinger C; Peter S; Safroneeva E; Rogler G; Schoepfer AM
    Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 26808396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characteristics of missed or interval colorectal cancer and patient survival: a population-based study.
    Samadder NJ; Curtin K; Tuohy TM; Pappas L; Boucher K; Provenzale D; Rowe KG; Mineau GP; Smith K; Pimentel R; Kirchhoff AC; Burt RW
    Gastroenterology; 2014 Apr; 146(4):950-60. PubMed ID: 24417818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physician Non-adherence to Colonoscopy Interval Guidelines in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.
    Johnson MR; Grubber J; Grambow SC; Maciejewski ML; Dunn-Thomas T; Provenzale D; Fisher DA
    Gastroenterology; 2015 Oct; 149(4):938-51. PubMed ID: 26122143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Longer mean colonoscopy withdrawal time is associated with increased adenoma detection: evidence from the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England.
    Lee TJ; Blanks RG; Rees CJ; Wright KC; Nickerson C; Moss SM; Chilton A; Goddard AF; Patnick J; McNally RJ; Rutter MD
    Endoscopy; 2013; 45(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 23254403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Colonoscopy quality measures: experience from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.
    Lee TJ; Rutter MD; Blanks RG; Moss SM; Goddard AF; Chilton A; Nickerson C; McNally RJ; Patnick J; Rees CJ
    Gut; 2012 Jul; 61(7):1050-7. PubMed ID: 21940723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of retroflexion vs. second forward view examination of the right colon on adenoma detection: a comparison study.
    Kushnir VM; Oh YS; Hollander T; Chen CH; Sayuk GS; Davidson N; Mullady D; Murad FM; Sharabash NM; Ruettgers E; Dassopoulos T; Easler JJ; Gyawali CP; Edmundowicz SA; Early DS
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Mar; 110(3):415-22. PubMed ID: 25732415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trends in Adenoma Detection Rates During the First 10 Years of the German Screening Colonoscopy Program.
    Brenner H; Altenhofen L; Kretschmann J; Rösch T; Pox C; Stock C; Hoffmeister M
    Gastroenterology; 2015 Aug; 149(2):356-66.e1. PubMed ID: 25911510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies.
    Jover R; Zapater P; Polanía E; Bujanda L; Lanas A; Hermo JA; Cubiella J; Ono A; González-Méndez Y; Peris A; Pellisé M; Seoane A; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Ponce M; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Fernández-Díez S; Arenas J; Sopeña F; de-Castro L; Vega-Villaamil P; Rodríguez-Soler M; Carballo F; Salas D; Morillas JD; Andreu M; Quintero E; Castells A;
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):381-389.e1. PubMed ID: 23218945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endoscopist characteristics that influence the quality of colonoscopy.
    Jover R; Zapater P; Bujanda L; Hernández V; Cubiella J; Pellisé M; Ponce M; Ono A; Lanas A; Seoane A; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Fernández-Díez S; Peris A; Nicolás-Pérez D; Murcia O; Castells A; Quintero E;
    Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 26845473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adenoma detection rates in an opportunistic screening colonoscopy program in Iran, a country with rising colorectal cancer incidence.
    Delavari A; Bishehsari F; Salimzadeh H; Khosravi P; Delavari F; Nasseri-Moghaddam S; Merat S; Ansari R; Vahedi H; Shahbazkhani B; Saberifiroozi M; Sotoudeh M; Malekzadeh R
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 14():196. PubMed ID: 25404264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.
    Barclay RL; Vicari JJ; Greenlaw RL
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Oct; 6(10):1091-8. PubMed ID: 18639495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Withdrawal times and associated factors in colonoscopy: a quality assurance multicenter assessment.
    Overholt BF; Brooks-Belli L; Grace M; Rankin K; Harrell R; Turyk M; Rosenberg FB; Barish RW; Gilinsky NH;
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2010 Apr; 44(4):e80-6. PubMed ID: 19881361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Opportunistic colorectal cancer screening using colonoscopy. Comparative results between two historical cohorts in Bucharest, Romania.
    Ionescu EM; Nicolaie T; Gologan SI; Mocanu A; Ditescu C; Arbanas T; Stoicescu A; Teiusanu A; Andrei M; Diculescu M; Ciocirlan M
    J Gastrointestin Liver Dis; 2015 Jun; 24(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 26114176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy.
    Chokshi RV; Hovis CE; Hollander T; Early DS; Wang JS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jun; 75(6):1197-203. PubMed ID: 22381531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The mean number of adenomas per procedure should become the gold standard to measure the neoplasia yield of colonoscopy: a population-based cohort study.
    Denis B; Sauleau EA; Gendre I; Exbrayat C; Piette C; Dancourt V; Foll Y; Ait Hadad H; Bailly L; Perrin P
    Dig Liver Dis; 2014 Feb; 46(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 24054769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Equivalency of fecal immunochemical tests and colonoscopy in familial colorectal cancer screening.
    Quintero E; Carrillo M; Gimeno-García AZ; Hernández-Guerra M; Nicolás-Pérez D; Alonso-Abreu I; Díez-Fuentes ML; Abraira V
    Gastroenterology; 2014 Nov; 147(5):1021-30.e1; quiz e16-7. PubMed ID: 25127679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates.
    Madhoun MF; Tierney WM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 21963062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.