These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

624 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26164852)

  • 41. A construction and demolition waste management model applied to social housing to trigger post-pandemic economic recovery in Mexico.
    Mercader-Moyano P; Camporeale PE; López-López J
    Waste Manag Res; 2022 Jul; 40(7):1027-1038. PubMed ID: 34714206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Engineered nanomaterials in rivers--exposure scenarios for Switzerland at high spatial and temporal resolution.
    Gottschalk F; Ort C; Scholz RW; Nowack B
    Environ Pollut; 2011 Dec; 159(12):3439-45. PubMed ID: 21890252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Overview regarding construction and demolition waste in Spain.
    Rodríguez-Robles D; García-González J; Juan-Valdés A; Morán-Del Pozo JM; Guerra-Romero MI
    Environ Technol; 2015; 36(23):3060-70. PubMed ID: 25230145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Estimation of building-related construction and demolition waste in Shanghai.
    Ding T; Xiao J
    Waste Manag; 2014 Nov; 34(11):2327-34. PubMed ID: 25164857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Spatial autocorrelation, influencing factors and temporal distribution of the construction and demolition waste disposal industry.
    Wang H; Pan X; Zhang S
    Waste Manag; 2021 May; 127():158-167. PubMed ID: 33945935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A building information modeling-based tool for estimating building demolition waste and evaluating its environmental impacts.
    Su S; Li S; Ju J; Wang Q; Xu Z
    Waste Manag; 2021 Oct; 134():159-169. PubMed ID: 34419703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Considering the forms of released engineered nanomaterials in probabilistic material flow analysis.
    Adam V; Caballero-Guzman A; Nowack B
    Environ Pollut; 2018 Dec; 243(Pt A):17-27. PubMed ID: 30170204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Business models for the reuse of construction and demolition waste.
    Buchard MV; Christensen TB
    Waste Manag Res; 2024 May; 42(5):359-371. PubMed ID: 37519293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Current state of building demolition and potential for selective dismantling in Vietnam.
    Hoang NH; Ishigaki T; Watari T; Yamada M; Kawamoto K
    Waste Manag; 2022 Jul; 149():218-227. PubMed ID: 35752109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Sustainability assessment of Construction and Demolition Waste management applied to an Italian case.
    Iodice S; Garbarino E; Cerreta M; Tonini D
    Waste Manag; 2021 Jun; 128():83-98. PubMed ID: 33975139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Willingness to pay for construction and demolition waste from buildings in Chile.
    Véliz KD; Ramírez-Rodríguez G; Ossio F
    Waste Manag; 2022 Jan; 137():222-230. PubMed ID: 34800746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Automatic identification of illegal construction and demolition waste landfills: A computer vision approach.
    Yong Q; Wu H; Wang J; Chen R; Yu B; Zuo J; Du L
    Waste Manag; 2023 Dec; 172():267-277. PubMed ID: 37925929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Challenges and opportunities of terahertz technology in construction and demolition waste management.
    Abina A; Puc U; Zidanšek A
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Aug; 315():115118. PubMed ID: 35472828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Recommendations for the management of construction and demolition waste in treatment plants.
    Barbudo A; Ayuso J; Lozano A; Cabrera M; López-Uceda A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jan; 27(1):125-132. PubMed ID: 31154639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Influence of construction and demolition waste management on the environmental impact of buildings.
    Coelho A; de Brito J
    Waste Manag; 2012 Mar; 32(3):532-41. PubMed ID: 22182407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Probabilistic material flow analysis of released nano titanium dioxide in Mexico.
    Ortiz-Galvez LM; Caballero-Guzman A; Lopes C; Alfaro-Moreno E
    NanoImpact; 2024 Jun; 35():100516. PubMed ID: 38838766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Life cycle assessment of the end-of-life phase of a residential building.
    Vitale P; Arena N; Di Gregorio F; Arena U
    Waste Manag; 2017 Feb; 60():311-321. PubMed ID: 27742229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Indicators to assess the recovery of natural resources contained in demolition waste.
    Roussat N; Méhu J; Dujet C
    Waste Manag Res; 2009 Mar; 27(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 19244415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Investigation of construction wastes generated in the Malaysian residential sector.
    Umar UA; Shafiq N; Isa MH
    Waste Manag Res; 2018 Dec; 36(12):1157-1165. PubMed ID: 30114979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Construction and demolition waste applications and maximum daily output in Spanish recycling plants.
    Rodríguez G; Sáez Del Bosque IF; Asensio E; Sánchez de Rojas MI; Medina C
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Apr; 38(4):423-432. PubMed ID: 32072878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.