These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26165793)

  • 1. Validation of an Objective Scoring System for Forme Fruste Keratoconus Detection and Post-LASIK Ectasia Risk Assessment in Asian Eyes.
    Chan C; Ang M; Saad A; Chua D; Mejia M; Lim L; Gatinel D
    Cornea; 2015 Sep; 34(9):996-1004. PubMed ID: 26165793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Screening of forme fruste keratoconus with the ocular response analyzer.
    Schweitzer C; Roberts CJ; Mahmoud AM; Colin J; Maurice-Tison S; Kerautret J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 May; 51(5):2403-10. PubMed ID: 19907025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Topographic, Tomographic, and Aberrometric Characteristics of Post-LASIK Ectasia.
    Padmanabhan P; Rachapalle Reddi S; Sivakumar PD
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Nov; 93(11):1364-1370. PubMed ID: 27391537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Role of Orbscan II in screening keratoconus suspects before refractive corneal surgery.
    Rao SN; Raviv T; Majmudar PA; Epstein RJ
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Sep; 109(9):1642-6. PubMed ID: 12208710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Objective and subjective diagnostic parameters in the fellow eye of unilateral keratoconus.
    Awad EA; Abou Samra WA; Torky MA; El-Kannishy AM
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 17(1):186. PubMed ID: 28985735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of cases and accuracy of 3 risk scoring systems in predicting ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Chan C; Saad A; Randleman JB; Harissi-Dagher M; Chua D; Qazi M; Saragoussi JJ; Shetty R; Ancel JM; Ang R; Reinstein DZ; Gatinel D
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2018 Aug; 44(8):979-992. PubMed ID: 30115298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of the reference surface shape for discriminating between normal corneas, subclinical keratoconus, and keratoconus.
    Smadja D; Santhiago MR; Mello GR; Krueger RR; Colin J; Touboul D
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Apr; 29(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 23557226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combining Placido and Corneal Wavefront Data for the Detection of Forme Fruste Keratoconus.
    Saad A; Gatinel D
    J Refract Surg; 2016 Aug; 32(8):510-6. PubMed ID: 27505311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discrimination between keratoconus, forme fruste keratoconus, and normal eyes using a novel OCT-based tomographer.
    Saad A; Debellemanière G; Zeboulon P; Rizk M; Rouger H; Mazharian A; Grise-Dulac A; Panthier C; Gatinel D
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2023 Nov; 49(11):1092-1097. PubMed ID: 37532249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Corneal topography in clinical practice.
    Ghemame M; Charpentier P; Mouriaux F
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2019 Dec; 42(10):e439-e451. PubMed ID: 31727328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of corneal biomechanics in patients with keratectasia following LASIK using dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer.
    Ueki R; Maeda N; Fuchihata M; Asai T; Koh S; Fujimoto H; Uematsu M; Nishida K
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jul; 62(4):443-450. PubMed ID: 29700642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early, Forme Fruste keratoconus and normal thin cornea, evaluation of sensitive parameters by combined Placido Scheimpflug topography.
    Gharieb HM; Abdelatif MK; Gharieb HM; Othman IS
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2024 Jan; 34(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 37731321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Posterior corneal elevation and back difference corneal elevation in diagnosing forme fruste keratoconus in the fellow eyes of unilateral keratoconus patients.
    Muftuoglu O; Ayar O; Ozulken K; Ozyol E; Akıncı A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1348-57. PubMed ID: 23820305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences in Posterior Corneal Features Between Normal Corneas and Subclinical Keratoconus.
    Golan O; Hwang ES; Lang P; Santhiago MR; Abulafia A; Touboul D; Krauthammer M; Smadja D
    J Refract Surg; 2018 Oct; 34(10):664-670. PubMed ID: 30296327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preoperative topographic characteristics of eyes that developed postoperative LASIK keratectasia.
    Bühren J; Schäffeler T; Kohnen T
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Aug; 29(8):540-9. PubMed ID: 23909781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of keratoconus in Asians: role of Orbscan II and Tomey TMS-2 corneal topography.
    Lim L; Wei RH; Chan WK; Tan DT
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 143(3):390-400. PubMed ID: 17224118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk factors and prognosis for corneal ectasia after LASIK.
    Randleman JB; Russell B; Ward MA; Thompson KP; Stulting RD
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Feb; 110(2):267-75. PubMed ID: 12578766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of keratocyte density between keratoconus, post-laser in situ keratomileusis keratectasia, and uncomplicated post-laser in situ keratomileusis cases. A confocal scan study.
    Ali Javadi M; Kanavi MR; Mahdavi M; Yaseri M; Rabiei HM; Javadi A; Sajjadi SH
    Cornea; 2009 Aug; 28(7):774-9. PubMed ID: 19574909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association between the percent tissue altered and post-laser in situ keratomileusis ectasia in eyes with normal preoperative topography.
    Santhiago MR; Smadja D; Gomes BF; Mello GR; Monteiro ML; Wilson SE; Randleman JB
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):87-95.e1. PubMed ID: 24727263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative evaluation of refractive surgery candidates with Placido topography, Orbscan II, Pentacam, and wavefront analysis.
    Nilforoushan MR; Speaker M; Marmor M; Abramson J; Tullo W; Morschauser D; Latkany R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Apr; 34(4):623-31. PubMed ID: 18361985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.