These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26165793)

  • 61. Risk factors for corneal ectasia after LASIK.
    Tabbara KF; Kotb AA
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1618-22. PubMed ID: 16949446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Keratectasia induced by laser in situ keratomileusis in keratoconus.
    Schmitt-Bernard CF; Lesage C; Arnaud B
    J Refract Surg; 2000; 16(3):368-70. PubMed ID: 10832988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Computational Biomechanical Analysis of Asymmetric Ectasia Risk in Unilateral Post-LASIK Ectasia.
    Vahdati A; Seven I; Mysore N; Randleman JB; Dupps WJ
    J Refract Surg; 2016 Dec; 32(12):811-820. PubMed ID: 27930791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Corneal thickness measurement using Orbscan, Pentacam, Galilei, and ultrasound in normal and post-femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis eyes.
    Park SH; Choi SK; Lee D; Jun EJ; Kim JH
    Cornea; 2012 Sep; 31(9):978-82. PubMed ID: 22699561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Aberrometry in clinical practice: case series.
    Radhakrishnan H; O'Donnell C
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2008 Aug; 31(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 18602858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Validation of the Ectasia Risk Score System for preoperative laser in situ keratomileusis screening.
    Randleman JB; Trattler WB; Stulting RD
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 May; 145(5):813-8. PubMed ID: 18328998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Distinguishing Highly Asymmetric Keratoconus Eyes Using Combined Scheimpflug and Spectral-Domain OCT Analysis.
    Hwang ES; Perez-Straziota CE; Kim SW; Santhiago MR; Randleman JB
    Ophthalmology; 2018 Dec; 125(12):1862-1871. PubMed ID: 30055838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Comparisons of corneal biomechanical and tomographic parameters among thin normal cornea, forme fruste keratoconus, and mild keratoconus.
    Tian L; Zhang D; Guo L; Qin X; Zhang H; Zhang H; Jie Y; Li L
    Eye Vis (Lond); 2021 Nov; 8(1):44. PubMed ID: 34784958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Iatrogenic keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis for less than -4.0 to -7.0 diopters of myopia.
    Amoils SP; Deist MB; Gous P; Amoils PM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2000 Jul; 26(7):967-77. PubMed ID: 10946186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Validation of metrics for the detection of subclinical keratoconus in a new patient collective.
    Bühren J; Schäffeler T; Kohnen T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Feb; 40(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 24360499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Bilateral severe keratoconus after laser in situ keratomileusis in a patient with forme fruste keratoconus.
    Lafond G; Bazin R; Lajoie C
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2001 Jul; 27(7):1115-8. PubMed ID: 11489585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Early biomechanical keratoconus pattern measured with an ocular response analyzer: curve analysis.
    Touboul D; Bénard A; Mahmoud AM; Gallois A; Colin J; Roberts CJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Dec; 37(12):2144-50. PubMed ID: 21978610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Difference map or single elevation map in the evaluation of corneal forward shift after LASIK.
    Yoshida T; Miyata K; Tokunaga T; Tanabe T; Oshika T
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Oct; 110(10):1926-30. PubMed ID: 14522766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Evaluation of corneal topography with Orbscan II in first-degree relatives of patients with keratoconus.
    Kaya V; Utine CA; Altunsoy M; Oral D; Yilmaz OF
    Cornea; 2008 Jun; 27(5):531-4. PubMed ID: 18520500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Comparative evaluation of Scheimpflug tomography parameters between thin non-keratoconic, subclinical keratoconic, and mild keratoconic corneas.
    Huseynli S; Salgado-Borges J; Alio JL
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):521-534. PubMed ID: 29566542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. External analysis of the Randleman Ectasia Risk Factor Score System: a review of 36 cases of post LASIK ectasia.
    Chan CC; Hodge C; Sutton G
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 May; 38(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 20665985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Pentacam HR criteria for curvature change in keratoconus and postoperative LASIK ectasia.
    Epstein RL; Chiu YL; Epstein GL
    J Refract Surg; 2012 Dec; 28(12):890-4. PubMed ID: 23231740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Prevention of corneal ectasia in laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Vinciguerra P; Camesasca FI
    J Refract Surg; 2001; 17(2 Suppl):S187-9. PubMed ID: 11316017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Evaluation of the corneal topographic characteristics of keratoconus with orbscan II in patients with and without atopy.
    Kaya V; Karakaya M; Utine CA; Albayrak S; Oge OF; Yilmaz OF
    Cornea; 2007 Sep; 26(8):945-8. PubMed ID: 17721293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Comparison of three-dimensional optical coherence tomography and combining a rotating Scheimpflug camera with a Placido topography system for forme fruste keratoconus diagnosis.
    Fukuda S; Beheregaray S; Hoshi S; Yamanari M; Lim Y; Hiraoka T; Yasuno Y; Oshika T
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 97(12):1554-9. PubMed ID: 24081501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.