These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26166847)

  • 1. Classes of Multiple Decision Functions Strongly Controlling FWER and FDR.
    Peña EA; Habiger JD; Wu W
    Metrika; 2015 Jul; 78(5):563-595. PubMed ID: 26166847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. POWER-ENHANCED MULTIPLE DECISION FUNCTIONS CONTROLLING FAMILY-WISE ERROR AND FALSE DISCOVERY RATES.
    Peña EA; Habiger JD; Wu W
    Ann Stat; 2011 Feb; 39(1):556-583. PubMed ID: 25018568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Controlling the false discovery rate with constraints: the Newman-Keuls test revisited.
    Shaffer JP
    Biom J; 2007 Feb; 49(1):136-43. PubMed ID: 17342955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SOME STEP-DOWN PROCEDURES CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE UNDER DEPENDENCE.
    Ge Y; Sealfon SC; Speed TP
    Stat Sin; 2008; 18(3):881-904. PubMed ID: 19018297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Resampling-based empirical Bayes multiple testing procedures for controlling generalized tail probability and expected value error rates: focus on the false discovery rate and simulation study.
    Dudoit S; Gilbert HN; van der Laan MJ
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):716-44. PubMed ID: 18932138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modifying the false discovery rate procedure based on the information theory under arbitrary correlation structure and its performance in high-dimensional genomic data.
    Rastaghi S; Saki A; Tabesh H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2024 Feb; 25(1):57. PubMed ID: 38317067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A general method for accurate estimation of false discovery rates in identification of differentially expressed genes.
    Tan YD; Xu H
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Jul; 30(14):2018-25. PubMed ID: 24632499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Power and type I error rate of false discovery rate approaches in genome-wide association studies.
    Yang Q; Cui J; Chazaro I; Cupples LA; Demissie S
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S134. PubMed ID: 16451593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An adaptive single-step FDR procedure with applications to DNA microarray analysis.
    Iyer V; Sarkar S
    Biom J; 2007 Feb; 49(1):127-35. PubMed ID: 17342954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-throughput DNA methylation datasets for evaluating false discovery rate methodologies.
    Asomaning N; Archer KJ
    Comput Stat Data Anal; 2012 Jun; 56(6):1748-1756. PubMed ID: 22611297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of false discovery rate procedure to pairwise comparisons of refractive index of glass fragments.
    Pawluk-Kołc M; Zieba-Palus J; Parczewski A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jun; 160(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 16221535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Augmentation procedures for control of the generalized family-wise error rate and tail probabilities for the proportion of false positives.
    van der Laan MJ; Dudoit S; Pollard KS
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2004; 3():Article15. PubMed ID: 16646793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing jumps via false discovery rate control.
    Yen YM
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e58365. PubMed ID: 23573190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimized multi-stage designs controlling the false discovery or the family-wise error rate.
    Zehetmayer S; Bauer P; Posch M
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(21):4145-60. PubMed ID: 18444249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. False discovery rate control for multiple testing based on discrete p-values.
    Chen X
    Biom J; 2020 Jul; 62(4):1060-1079. PubMed ID: 31958180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quick calculation for sample size while controlling false discovery rate with application to microarray analysis.
    Liu P; Hwang JT
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 17237060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the operational characteristics of the Benjamini and Hochberg False Discovery Rate procedure.
    Green GH; Diggle PJ
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article27. PubMed ID: 18052910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bon-EV: an improved multiple testing procedure for controlling false discovery rates.
    Li D; Xie Z; Zand M; Fogg T; Dye T
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):1. PubMed ID: 28049414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Control procedures and estimators of the false discovery rate and their application in low-dimensional settings: an empirical investigation.
    Brinster R; Köttgen A; Tayo BO; Schumacher M; Sekula P;
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Mar; 19(1):78. PubMed ID: 29499647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Revisiting the genome-wide significance threshold for common variant GWAS.
    Chen Z; Boehnke M; Wen X; Mukherjee B
    G3 (Bethesda); 2021 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 33585870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.