BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26166848)

  • 21. Prediction of cytotoxicity data (CC(50)) of anti-HIV 5-phenyl-1-phenylamino-1H-imidazole derivatives by artificial neural network trained with Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm.
    Arab Chamjangali M; Beglari M; Bagherian G
    J Mol Graph Model; 2007 Jul; 26(1):360-7. PubMed ID: 17350867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative chemometric modeling of cytochrome 3A4 inhibitory activity of structurally diverse compounds using stepwise MLR, FA-MLR, PLS, GFA, G/PLS and ANN techniques.
    Roy K; Pratim Roy P
    Eur J Med Chem; 2009 Jul; 44(7):2913-22. PubMed ID: 19128860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of Different 2D and 3D-QSAR Methods on Activity Prediction of Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonists.
    Dastmalchi S; Hamzeh-Mivehroud M; Asadpour-Zeynali K
    Iran J Pharm Res; 2012; 11(1):97-108. PubMed ID: 25317190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. QSTR with extended topochemical atom (ETA) indices. 12. QSAR for the toxicity of diverse aromatic compounds to Tetrahymena pyriformis using chemometric tools.
    Roy K; Ghosh G
    Chemosphere; 2009 Nov; 77(7):999-1009. PubMed ID: 19709717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Development of linear and nonlinear predictive QSAR models and their external validation using molecular similarity principle for anti-HIV indolyl aryl sulfones.
    Roy K; Mandal AS
    J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem; 2008 Dec; 23(6):980-95. PubMed ID: 18608761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prediction of Bovine Serum Albumin-Water Partition Coefficients of a Wide Variety of Neutral Organic Compounds by Means of Support Vector Machine.
    Golmohammadi H; Dashtbozorgi Z; Acree WE
    Mol Inform; 2012 Dec; 31(11-12):867-78. PubMed ID: 27476740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. QSPR Models to Predict Thermodynamic Properties of Cycloalkanes Using Molecular Descriptors and GA-MLR Method.
    Joudaki D; Shafiei F
    Curr Comput Aided Drug Des; 2020; 16(1):6-16. PubMed ID: 30827257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bee algorithm and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system as tools for QSAR study toxicity of substituted benzenes to Tetrahymena pyriformis.
    Zarei K; Atabati M; Kor K
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2014 Jun; 92(6):642-9. PubMed ID: 24638918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Predicting rejection of emerging contaminants through RO membrane filtration based on ANN-QSAR modeling approach: trends in molecular descriptors and structures towards rejections.
    Mousavi SL; Sajjadi SM
    RSC Adv; 2023 Aug; 13(34):23754-23771. PubMed ID: 37560620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Prediction of Oral Acute Toxicity of Organophosphates Using QSAR Methods.
    Kianpour M; Mohammadinasab E; Isfahani TM
    Curr Comput Aided Drug Des; 2021; 17(1):38-56. PubMed ID: 31880265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of artificial neural network and multiple linear regression in the optimization of formulation parameters of leuprolide acetate loaded liposomes.
    Arulsudar N; Subramanian N; Muthy RS
    J Pharm Pharm Sci; 2005 Aug; 8(2):243-58. PubMed ID: 16124936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Linear vs. Non-linear Modelling. Case study: modelling of binding affinity of inhibitors to Trypsin.
    Zupan J; Zuperl S
    Acta Chim Slov; 2011 Sep; 58(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 24062108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Predicting blood β-hydroxybutyrate using milk Fourier transform infrared spectrum, milk composition, and producer-reported variables with multiple linear regression, partial least squares regression, and artificial neural network.
    Pralle RS; Weigel KW; White HM
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 May; 101(5):4378-4387. PubMed ID: 29477523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of QSAR models based on combinations of genetic algorithm, stepwise multiple linear regression, and artificial neural network methods to predict Kd of some derivatives of aromatic sulfonamides as carbonic anhydrase II inhibitors.
    Maleki A; Daraei H; Alaei L; Faraji A
    Bioorg Khim; 2014; 40(1):70-84. PubMed ID: 25898725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prediction of air-to-blood partition coefficients of volatile organic compounds using genetic algorithm and artificial neural network.
    Konoz E; Golmohammadi H
    Anal Chim Acta; 2008 Jul; 619(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 18558108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Application of genetic algorithm-support vector machine (GA-SVM) for prediction of BK-channels activity.
    Pourbasheer E; Riahi S; Ganjali MR; Norouzi P
    Eur J Med Chem; 2009 Dec; 44(12):5023-8. PubMed ID: 19837488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prediction of selectivity coefficients of a theophylline-selective electrode using MLR and ANN.
    Riahi S; Mousavi MF; Shamsipur M
    Talanta; 2006 May; 69(3):736-40. PubMed ID: 18970631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An Electronic-structure Informatics Study on the Toxicity of Alkylphenols to Tetrahymena pyriformis.
    Sugimoto M; Manggara AB; Yoshida K; Inoue T; Ideo T
    Mol Inform; 2020 Jan; 39(1-2):e1900121. PubMed ID: 31930704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Linear and non-linear quantitative structure-activity relationship models on indole substitution patterns as inhibitors of HIV-1 attachment.
    Nirouei M; Ghasemi G; Abdolmaleki P; Tavakoli A; Shariati S
    Indian J Biochem Biophys; 2012 Jun; 49(3):202-10. PubMed ID: 22803336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Artificial neural network modeling of Kováts retention indices for noncyclic and monocyclic terpenes.
    Jalali-Heravi M; Fatemi MH
    J Chromatogr A; 2001 Apr; 915(1-2):177-83. PubMed ID: 11358247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.