110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26167813)
1. Does the Choice of NOEC or EC10 Affect the Hazardous Concentration for 5% of the Species?
Iwasaki Y; Kotani K; Kashiwada S; Masunaga S
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Aug; 49(15):9326-30. PubMed ID: 26167813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation and comparison of the relationship between NOEC and EC10 or EC20 values in chronic Daphnia toxicity testing.
Beasley A; Belanger SE; Brill JL; Otter RR
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2015 Oct; 34(10):2378-84. PubMed ID: 26033640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relative robustness of NOEC and ECx against large uncertainties in data.
Tanaka Y; Nakamura K; Yokomizo H
PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206901. PubMed ID: 30485303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Statistical analysis of regulatory ecotoxicity tests.
Isnard P; Flammarion P; Roman G; Babut M; Bastien P; Bintein S; Esserméant L; Férard JF; Gallotti-Schmitt S; Saouter E; Saroli M; Thiébaud H; Tomassone R; Vindimian E
Chemosphere; 2001 Nov; 45(4-5):659-69. PubMed ID: 11680762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Statistical comparisons of the no-observed-effect concentration and the effective concentration at 10% inhibition (EC10) in algal toxicity tests.
Shieh JN; Chao MR; Chen CY
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 11380172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Bayesian approach for determining the no effect concentration and hazardous concentration in ecotoxicology.
Fox DR
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2010 Feb; 73(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 19836077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Statistical results and implications of the enchytraeid reproduction ringtest.
Weyers A; Römbke J; Moser T; Ratte HT
Environ Sci Technol; 2002 May; 36(10):2116-21. PubMed ID: 12038819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Approaches for establishing predicted-no-effect concentrations for population-level ecological risk assessment in the context of chemical substances management.
Lin BL; Tokai A; Nakanishi J
Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Jul; 39(13):4833-40. PubMed ID: 16053081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing ecotoxicological effect concentrations of chemicals established in multi-species vs. single-species toxicity test systems.
De Laender F; De Schamphelaere KA; Vanrolleghem PA; Janssen CR
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Feb; 72(2):310-5. PubMed ID: 18774172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An updated weight of evidence approach to the aquatic hazard assessment of Bisphenol A and the derivation a new predicted no effect concentration (Pnec) using a non-parametric methodology.
Wright-Walters M; Volz C; Talbott E; Davis D
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Jan; 409(4):676-85. PubMed ID: 21130487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Confidence limits for hazardous concentrations based on logistically distributed NOEC toxicity data.
Aldenberg T; Slob W
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1993 Feb; 25(1):48-63. PubMed ID: 7682918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Species Sensitivity Distributions for Nonylphenol to Estimate Soil Hazardous Concentration.
Kwak JI; Moon J; Kim D; Cui R; An YJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Dec; 51(23):13957-13966. PubMed ID: 29115821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dose-response regressions for algal growth and similar continuous endpoints: calculation of effective concentrations.
Christensen ER; Kusk KO; Nyholm N
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2009 Apr; 28(4):826-35. PubMed ID: 19391676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are acute and chronic saltwater fish studies required for plant protection and biocidal product active substance risk assessment?
Wheeler JR; Maynard SK; Crane M
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2014 Mar; 33(3):703-7. PubMed ID: 24288251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Derivation of freshwater quality criteria for zinc using interspecies correlation estimation models to protect aquatic life in China.
Feng CL; Wu FC; Dyer SD; Chang H; Zhao XL
Chemosphere; 2013 Jan; 90(3):1177-83. PubMed ID: 23058200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predicted no effect concentration derivation as a significant source of variability in environmental hazard assessments of chemicals in aquatic systems: an international analysis.
Hahn T; Diamond J; Dobson S; Howe P; Kielhorn J; Koennecker G; Lee-Steere C; Mangelsdorf I; Schneider U; Sugaya Y; Taylor K; Dam RV; Stauber JL
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2014 Jan; 10(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 23913910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Better bootstrap estimation of hazardous concentration thresholds for aquatic assemblages.
Grist EP; Leung KM; Wheeler JR; Crane M
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2002 Jul; 21(7):1515-24. PubMed ID: 12109754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterizing Freshwater Ecotoxicity of More Than 9000 Chemicals by Combining Different Levels of Available Measured Test Data with In Silico Predictions.
Douziech M; Oginah SA; Golsteijn L; Hauschild MZ; Jolliet O; Owsianiak M; Posthuma L; Fantke P
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38860654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SSDs revisited: part II-practical considerations in the development and use of application factors applied to species sensitivity distributions.
Belanger SE; Carr GJ
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2019 Jul; 38(7):1526-1541. PubMed ID: 30994956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of in silico development of aquatic toxicity species sensitivity distributions.
Barron MG; Jackson CR; Awkerman JA
Aquat Toxicol; 2012 Jul; 116-117():1-7. PubMed ID: 22459408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
