376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26167821)
1. [Evaluation of common commercial systems for the identification of yeast isolates in microbiology laboratories: a multicenter study].
Karabıçak N; Uludağ Altun H; Karatuna O; Hazırolan G; Aksu N; Adiloğlu A; Akyar I
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2015 Apr; 49(2):210-20. PubMed ID: 26167821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of three commercial systems for identification of yeasts commonly isolated in the clinical microbiology laboratory.
Wadlin JK; Hanko G; Stewart R; Pape J; Nachamkin I
J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):1967-70. PubMed ID: 10325356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card and API 20C yeast identification systems.
Fenn JP; Segal H; Barland B; Denton D; Whisenant J; Chun H; Christofferson K; Hamilton L; Carroll K
J Clin Microbiol; 1994 May; 32(5):1184-7. PubMed ID: 8051243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of the VITEK 2 system to identify and test the antifungal susceptibility of clinically relevant yeast species.
Melhem MS; Bertoletti A; Lucca HR; Silva RB; Meneghin FA; Szeszs MW
Braz J Microbiol; 2013 Dec; 44(4):1257-66. PubMed ID: 24688520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Candida and candidaemia. Susceptibility and epidemiology.
Arendrup MC
Dan Med J; 2013 Nov; 60(11):B4698. PubMed ID: 24192246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of Phoenix™ Yeast ID Panel and API® ID 32C commercial systems for the identification of Candida species isolated from clinical samples].
Gayibova Ü; Dalyan Cılo B; Ağca H; Ener B
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2014 Jul; 48(3):438-48. PubMed ID: 25052110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical comparison of the Baxter MicroScan Yeast Identification Panel and the Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card.
Riddle DL; Giger O; Miller L; Hall GS; Woods GL
Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Apr; 101(4):438-42. PubMed ID: 8160633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of two commercialized systems for the rapid identification of medically important yeasts.
Quindós G; Lipperheide V; Pontón J
Mycoses; 1993; 36(9-10):299-303. PubMed ID: 8015561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multicenter evaluation of the new VITEK 2 advanced colorimetric yeast identification card.
Hata DJ; Hall L; Fothergill AW; Larone DH; Wengenack NL
J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Apr; 45(4):1087-92. PubMed ID: 17267631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Misidentification of clinical yeast isolates by using the updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card.
Dooley DP; Beckius ML; Jeffrey BS
J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Dec; 32(12):2889-92. PubMed ID: 7883873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multicenter study evaluating the Vitek MS system for identification of medically important yeasts.
Westblade LF; Jennemann R; Branda JA; Bythrow M; Ferraro MJ; Garner OB; Ginocchio CC; Lewinski MA; Manji R; Mochon AB; Procop GW; Richter SS; Rychert JA; Sercia L; Burnham CA
J Clin Microbiol; 2013 Jul; 51(7):2267-72. PubMed ID: 23658267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative study of seven commercial yeast identification systems.
Verweij PE; Breuker IM; Rijs AJ; Meis JF
J Clin Pathol; 1999 Apr; 52(4):271-3. PubMed ID: 10474518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the new Micronaut-Candida system compared to the API ID32C method for yeast identification.
Szabó Z; Tóth B; Kovács M; Kardos G; Maráz A; Rozgonyi F; Majoros L
J Clin Microbiol; 2008 May; 46(5):1824-5. PubMed ID: 18322057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the updated Vitek yeast identification data base.
el-Zaatari M; Pasarell L; McGinnis MR; Buckner J; Land GA; Salkin IF
J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Sep; 28(9):1938-41. PubMed ID: 2229376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Evaluation of PNA-FISH method for direct identification of Candida species in blood culture samples and its potential impact on guidance of antifungal therapy].
Doğan Ö; İnkaya AÇ; Gülmez D; Uzun Ö; Akova M; Arıkan Akdağlı S
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2016 Oct; 50(4):580-589. PubMed ID: 28124963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluation of peptide nucleic acid fluorescent in situ hybridization (PNA FISH) method in the identifi cation of Candida species isolated from blood cultures].
Aydemir G; Koç AN; Atalay MA
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2016 Apr; 50(2):293-9. PubMed ID: 27175502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are the Conventional Commercial Yeast Identification Methods Still Helpful in the Era of New Clinical Microbiology Diagnostics? A Meta-Analysis of Their Accuracy.
Posteraro B; Efremov L; Leoncini E; Amore R; Posteraro P; Ricciardi W; Sanguinetti M
J Clin Microbiol; 2015 Aug; 53(8):2439-50. PubMed ID: 25994160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identification of Candida dubliniensis based on temperature and utilization of xylose and alpha-methyl-D-glucoside as determined with the API 20C AUX and vitek YBC systems.
Gales AC; Pfaller MA; Houston AK; Joly S; Sullivan DJ; Coleman DC; Soll DR
J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Dec; 37(12):3804-8. PubMed ID: 10565888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identification of clinical yeasts by Vitek MS system compared with API ID 32 C.
Durán-Valle MT; Sanz-Rodríguez N; Muñoz-Paraíso C; Almagro-Moltó M; Gómez-Garcés JL
Med Mycol; 2014 May; 52(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 24782106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Antifungal susceptibility profiles of bloodstream yeast isolates by Sensititre YeastOne over nine years at a large Italian teaching hospital.
Posteraro B; Spanu T; Fiori B; De Maio F; De Carolis E; Giaquinto A; Prete V; De Angelis G; Torelli R; D'Inzeo T; Vella A; De Luca A; Tumbarello M; Ricciardi W; Sanguinetti M
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2015 Jul; 59(7):3944-55. PubMed ID: 25896705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
