293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26167984)
21. Sequential Monte Carlo without likelihoods.
Sisson SA; Fan Y; Tanaka MM
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Feb; 104(6):1760-5. PubMed ID: 17264216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Uncovering mental representations with Markov chain Monte Carlo.
Sanborn AN; Griffiths TL; Shiffrin RM
Cogn Psychol; 2010 Mar; 60(2):63-106. PubMed ID: 19703686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessing the convergence of Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods: an example from evaluation of diagnostic tests in absence of a gold standard.
Toft N; Innocent GT; Gettinby G; Reid SW
Prev Vet Med; 2007 May; 79(2-4):244-56. PubMed ID: 17292499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Bayesian and maximum likelihood estimation of genetic maps.
York TL; Durrett RT; Tanksley S; Nielsen R
Genet Res; 2005 Apr; 85(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 16174334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Monte Carlo likelihood in the genetic mapping of complex traits.
Thompson EA
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1994 Jun; 344(1310):345-50; discussion 350-1. PubMed ID: 7800704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Searching for efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo proposal kernels.
Yang Z; Rodríguez CE
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Nov; 110(48):19307-12. PubMed ID: 24218600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The variability in likelihood ratios due to different mechanisms.
Bright JA; Stevenson KE; Curran JM; Buckleton JS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jan; 14():187-90. PubMed ID: 25450791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Exact test of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium by Markov chain Monte Carlo.
Yuan A; Bonney GE
Math Med Biol; 2003 Dec; 20(4):327-40. PubMed ID: 14969383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Exploring heterogeneity in tumour data using Markov chain Monte Carlo.
de Gunst MC; Dewanji A; Luebeck EG
Stat Med; 2003 May; 22(10):1691-707. PubMed ID: 12720305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Power Analysis for the Likelihood-Ratio Test in Latent Markov Models: Shortcutting the Bootstrap p-Value-Based Method.
Gudicha DW; Schmittmann VD; Tekle FB; Vermunt JK
Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(5):649-660. PubMed ID: 27739902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for state-space models with point process observations.
Yuan K; Girolami M; Niranjan M
Neural Comput; 2012 Jun; 24(6):1462-86. PubMed ID: 22364499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. On the reliability of NMR relaxation data analyses: a Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach.
Abergel D; Volpato A; Coutant EP; Polimeno A
J Magn Reson; 2014 Sep; 246():94-103. PubMed ID: 25117152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Identifiability of parameters in MCMC Bayesian inference of phylogeny.
Rannala B
Syst Biol; 2002 Oct; 51(5):754-60. PubMed ID: 12396589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Harnessing the theoretical foundations of the exponential and beta-Poisson dose-response models to quantify parameter uncertainty using Markov Chain Monte Carlo.
Schmidt PJ; Pintar KD; Fazil AM; Topp E
Risk Anal; 2013 Sep; 33(9):1677-93. PubMed ID: 23311599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Inference in high-dimensional parameter space.
O'Hare A
J Comput Biol; 2015 Nov; 22(11):997-1004. PubMed ID: 26176624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. MCMC estimation for the p(2) network regression model with crossed random effects.
Zijlstra BJ; van Duijn MA; Snijders TA
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):143-66. PubMed ID: 19208289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Guided tree topology proposals for Bayesian phylogenetic inference.
Höhna S; Drummond AJ
Syst Biol; 2012 Jan; 61(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 21828081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Estimating the scaled mutation rate and mutation bias with site frequency data.
Vogl C
Theor Popul Biol; 2014 Dec; 98():19-27. PubMed ID: 25453604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Multipoint linkage analysis via Metropolis jumping kernels.
Lin S
Biometrics; 1996 Dec; 52(4):1417-27. PubMed ID: 8962460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS.
Lambert PC; Sutton AJ; Burton PR; Abrams KR; Jones DR
Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(15):2401-28. PubMed ID: 16015676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
