These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26168141)

  • 1. Inhibition in time-based visual selection: Strategic or by default?
    Zupan Z; Watson DG; Blagrove E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1442-61. PubMed ID: 26168141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determining the capacity of time-based selection.
    Watson DG; Kunar MA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):350-66. PubMed ID: 22004197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Blink and you won't miss it: the preview benefit in visual marking survives internally generated eyeblinks.
    von Mühlenen A; Watson D; Gunnell DO
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1279-90. PubMed ID: 23398259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selection of new objects by onset capture and visual marking.
    Osugi T; Hayashi D; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2016 May; 122():21-33. PubMed ID: 27001341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Involuntary attentional capture by task-irrelevant objects that match the search template for category detection in natural scenes.
    Reeder RR; van Zoest W; Peelen MV
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1070-80. PubMed ID: 25810159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Item and category-based attentional control during search for real-world objects: Can you find the pants among the pans?
    Nako R; Wu R; Smith TJ; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1283-8. PubMed ID: 24820441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual attention is required for multiple object tracking.
    Tran A; Hoffman JE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2103-2114. PubMed ID: 27854457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual marking and facial affect: can an emotional face be ignored?
    Blagrove E; Watson DG
    Emotion; 2010 Apr; 10(2):147-68. PubMed ID: 20364892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prioritizing selection of new elements: bottom-up versus top-down control.
    Donk M; Theeuwes J
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Nov; 65(8):1231-42. PubMed ID: 14710958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual marking: evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm.
    Watson DG; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Apr; 62(3):471-81. PubMed ID: 10909238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual marking and change blindness: moving occluders and transient masks neutralize shape changes to ignored objects.
    Watson DG; Kunar MA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1391-405. PubMed ID: 20853998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Flexible feature-based inhibition in visual search mediates magnified impairments of selection: evidence from carry-over effects under dynamic preview-search conditions.
    Andrews LS; Watson DG; Humphreys GW; Braithwaite JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1007-16. PubMed ID: 21553995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of the psychological refractory period and prioritized processing paradigms: Can the response-selection bottleneck model explain them both?
    Miller J; Durst M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1420-41. PubMed ID: 26168143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual marking: the influence of temporary changes on time-based visual selection.
    Watson DG; Compton S; Bailey H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1729-38. PubMed ID: 21517208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differential inter-trial effects in the visual search of children, adolescents, and young adults.
    An J; Wen W; Wu Z; Wan X
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Nov; 191():171-178. PubMed ID: 30286429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual marking beside the mark: prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets.
    Donk M; Theeuwes J
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jul; 63(5):891-900. PubMed ID: 11521854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Introspection during visual search.
    Reyes G; Sackur J
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 Oct; 29():212-29. PubMed ID: 25286130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Context homogeneity facilitates both distractor inhibition and target enhancement.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
    J Vis; 2013 May; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23650629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prestimulus oscillations in the alpha band of the EEG are modulated by the difficulty of feature discrimination and predict activation of a sensory discrimination process.
    Roberts DM; Fedota JR; Buzzell GA; Parasuraman R; McDonald CG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Aug; 26(8):1615-28. PubMed ID: 24405187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional switching in the sequential flanker task: age, location, and time course effects.
    Li KZ; Dupuis K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):416-27. PubMed ID: 17869202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.