These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26168145)

  • 1. Spatial attention and environmental information.
    Prinzmetal W; Whiteford KL; Austerweil JL; Landau AN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1396-408. PubMed ID: 26168145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visualizing the temporal dynamics of spatial information processing responsible for the Simon effect and its amplification by inhibition of return.
    Hilchey MD; Ivanoff J; Taylor TL; Klein RM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Feb; 136(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 20932500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cue validity modulates the neural correlates of covert endogenous orienting of attention in parietal and frontal cortex.
    Vossel S; Thiel CM; Fink GR
    Neuroimage; 2006 Sep; 32(3):1257-64. PubMed ID: 16846742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues.
    Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of pre-cueing on spatial attention across perception and action.
    Israel MM; Jolicoeur P; Cohen A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1840-1846. PubMed ID: 29110247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of probabilistic feature cueing depends on the level of cue abstraction.
    Dombert PL; Fink GR; Vossel S
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):685-94. PubMed ID: 26586268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The time course of attention: selection is transient.
    Wilschut A; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(11):e27661. PubMed ID: 22125619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing.
    He X; Humphreys G; Fan S; Chen L; Han S
    Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():116-25. PubMed ID: 18955038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Masked stimuli modulate endogenous shifts of spatial attention.
    Palmer S; Mattler U
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Jun; 22(2):486-503. PubMed ID: 23528730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cueing spatial attention through timing and probability.
    Girardi G; Antonucci G; Nico D
    Cortex; 2013 Jan; 49(1):211-21. PubMed ID: 21982581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Voluntary and involuntary attention have different consequences: the effect of perceptual difficulty.
    Prinzmetal W; Zvinyatskovskiy A; Gutierrez P; Dilem L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):352-69. PubMed ID: 18609402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Common mechanisms of spatial attention in memory and perception: a tactile dual-task study.
    Katus T; Andersen SK; Müller MM
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Mar; 24(3):707-18. PubMed ID: 23172773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The neglected contribution of memory encoding in spatial cueing: A new theory of costs and benefits.
    Chen H; Wyble B
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Nov; 125(6):936-968. PubMed ID: 30080067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual flicker in the gamma-band range does not draw attention.
    van Diepen RM; Born S; Souto D; Gauch A; Kerzel D
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Mar; 103(3):1606-13. PubMed ID: 20089822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attention to baseline: does orienting visuospatial attention really facilitate target detection?
    Albares M; Criaud M; Wardak C; Nguyen SC; Ben Hamed S; Boulinguez P
    J Neurophysiol; 2011 Aug; 106(2):809-16. PubMed ID: 21613585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Task-relevant information is prioritized in spatiotemporal contextual cueing.
    Higuchi Y; Ueda Y; Ogawa H; Saiki J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2397-2410. PubMed ID: 27566325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dissociating location-based and object-based cue validity effects in object-based attention.
    Chou WL; Yeh SL
    Vision Res; 2018 Feb; 143():34-41. PubMed ID: 29273205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time-dependent effects of discrete spatial cues on the planning of directed movements.
    Pellizzer G; Hedges JH; Villanueva RR
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 172(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 16432698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The interaction between stimulus-driven and goal-driven orienting as revealed by eye movements.
    Schreij D; Los SA; Theeuwes J; Enns JT; Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):378-90. PubMed ID: 24128346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.