These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26169192)

  • 1. Accuracy Evaluation of CONTOUR(®)PLUS Compared With Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems.
    Dunne N; Viggiani MT; Pardo S; Robinson C; Parkes JL
    Diabetes Ther; 2015 Sep; 6(3):377-88. PubMed ID: 26169192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy evaluation of contour next compared with five blood glucose monitoring systems across a wide range of blood glucose concentrations occurring in a clinical research setting.
    Klaff LJ; Brazg R; Hughes K; Tideman AM; Schachner HC; Stenger P; Pardo S; Dunne N; Parkes JL
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Jan; 17(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 25260047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative Accuracy of 3 Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems that Communicate with an Insulin Pump.
    Greene C; Brown D; Wallace JF; Pardo S; Pflug B
    Endocr Pract; 2014 Oct; 20(10):1016-21. PubMed ID: 24793918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems: the North American comparator trial.
    Halldorsdottir S; Warchal-Windham ME; Wallace JF; Pardo S; Parkes JL; Simmons DA
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Sep; 7(5):1294-304. PubMed ID: 24124957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems obtained from the pharmacy: a European multicenter study with 453 subjects.
    Tack C; Pohlmeier H; Behnke T; Schmid V; Grenningloh M; Forst T; Pfützner A
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Apr; 14(4):330-7. PubMed ID: 22176154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems in Unaltered Blood Samples in the Low Glycemic Range and Blood Samples in the Concentration Range Defined by ISO 15197.
    Freckmann G; Pleus S; Link M; Baumstark A; Schmid C; Högel J; Haug C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Sep; 17(9):625-34. PubMed ID: 26062008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of hematocrit interference with MyStar extra and seven competitive devices.
    Demircik F; Ramljak S; Hermanns I; Pfützner A; Pfützner A
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 9(2):262-7. PubMed ID: 25549636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of bolus insulin dose errors based on results of a clinical trial of five blood glucose monitoring systems.
    Pardo S; Dunne N; Simmons DA
    Ther Deliv; 2019 Dec; 10(12):793-799. PubMed ID: 31789119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bolus Insulin Dose Error Distributions Based on Results From Two Clinical Trials Comparing Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems.
    Pardo S; Dunne N; Simmons DA
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Sep; 11(5):970-974. PubMed ID: 28604064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A glucose meter accuracy and precision comparison: the FreeStyle Flash Versus the Accu-Chek Advantage, Accu-Chek Compact Plus, Ascensia Contour, and the BD Logic.
    Thomas LE; Kane MP; Bakst G; Busch RS; Hamilton RA; Abelseth JM
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2008 Apr; 10(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 18260773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the FreeStyle® Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring System in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes.
    Massa GG; Gys I; Op 't Eyndt A; Bevilacqua E; Wijnands A; Declercq P; Zeevaert R
    Horm Res Paediatr; 2018; 89(3):189-199. PubMed ID: 29587254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Comprehensive Performance Evaluation of Five Blood Glucose Systems in the Hypo-, Eu-, and Hyperglycemic Range.
    Zijlstra E; Heinemann L; Fischer A; Kapitza C
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 10(6):1316-1323. PubMed ID: 27605592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Calibrated With Capillary Values Using Capillary or Venous Glucose Levels as a Reference.
    Andelin M; Kropff J; Matuleviciene V; Joseph JI; Attvall S; Theodorsson E; Hirsch IB; Imberg H; Dahlqvist S; Klonoff D; Haraldsson B; DeVries JH; Lind M
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 10(4):876-84. PubMed ID: 26810924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. User Performance Evaluation and System Accuracy Assessment of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems With Color Coding of Measurement Results.
    Pleus S; Baumstark A; Schauer S; Kölle J; Jendrike N; Mende J; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2024 May; 18(3):644-652. PubMed ID: 36433806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance Evaluation of Three Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Using ISO 15197: 2013 Accuracy Criteria, Consensus and Surveillance Error Grid Analyses, and Insulin Dosing Error Modeling in a Hospital Setting.
    Bedini JL; Wallace JF; Pardo S; Petruschke T
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Oct; 10(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 26445813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of the Third Generation of a 14-Day Continuous Glucose Monitoring System.
    Alva S; Brazg R; Castorino K; Kipnes M; Liljenquist DR; Liu H
    Diabetes Ther; 2023 Apr; 14(4):767-776. PubMed ID: 36877403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Seven-Year Clinical Surveillance Program Demonstrates Consistent MARD Accuracy Performance of a Blood Glucose Test Strip.
    Setford S; Grady M; Mackintosh S; Donald R; Levy B
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2018 Sep; 12(5):1016-1023. PubMed ID: 29845873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of three frequently used blood glucose monitoring devices in clinical routine.
    Zueger T; Schuler V; Stettler C; Diem P; Christ ER
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2012; 142():w13631. PubMed ID: 22791566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Clinical Trial of the Accuracy and Treatment Experience of the Flash Glucose Monitor FreeStyle Libre in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.
    Ólafsdóttir AF; Attvall S; Sandgren U; Dahlqvist S; Pivodic A; Skrtic S; Theodorsson E; Lind M
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2017 Mar; 19(3):164-172. PubMed ID: 28263665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems in the Hands of Intended Users and Trained Personnel Based on ISO 15197 Requirements.
    Freckmann G; Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Rittmeyer D; Pleus S; Haug C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2017 Apr; 19(4):246-254. PubMed ID: 28225633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.