These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2616943)

  • 1. Misclassification in more than one factor in a case-control study: a combination of Mantel-Haenszel and maximum likelihood approaches.
    Duffy SW; Rohan TE; Day NE
    Stat Med; 1989 Dec; 8(12):1529-36. PubMed ID: 2616943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating a Logistic Discrimination Functions When One of the Training Samples Is Subject to Misclassification: A Maximum Likelihood Approach.
    Nagelkerke N; Fidler V
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140718. PubMed ID: 26474313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Misclassification in a matched case-control study with variable matching ratio: application to a study of c-erbB-2 overexpression and breast cancer.
    Duffy SW; Rohan TE; Kandel R; Prevost TC; Rice K; Myles JP
    Stat Med; 2003 Aug; 22(15):2459-68. PubMed ID: 12872302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating a relative risk across sparse case-control and follow-up studies: a method for meta-analysis.
    Austin H; Perkins LL; Martin DO
    Stat Med; 1997 May; 16(9):1005-15. PubMed ID: 9160495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of case-crossover designs.
    Marshall RJ; Jackson RT
    Stat Med; 1993 Dec; 12(24):2333-41. PubMed ID: 8134736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of a common effect parameter from sparse follow-up data.
    Greenland S; Robins JM
    Biometrics; 1985 Mar; 41(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 4005387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing hypotheses in case-control studies--equivalence of Mantel-Haenszel statistics and logit score tests.
    Day NE; Byar DP
    Biometrics; 1979 Sep; 35(3):623-30. PubMed ID: 497345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A method for combining matched and unmatched binary data. Application to randomized, controlled trials of photocoagulation in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy.
    Duffy SW; Rohan TE; Altman DG
    Am J Epidemiol; 1989 Aug; 130(2):371-8. PubMed ID: 2750732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of confounding and interaction using the mantel-haenszel risk estimation method.
    Jose S; George PS; Mathew A
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2008; 9(2):323-5. PubMed ID: 18712984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relative risk, risk difference and rate difference models for sparse stratified data: a pseudo likelihood approach.
    Stijnen T; Van Houwelingen HC
    Stat Med; 1993 Dec; 12(24):2285-303. PubMed ID: 8134733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating attributable risk from case-control studies.
    Whittemore AS
    Am J Epidemiol; 1983 Jan; 117(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 6823955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Generalized Mantel-Haenszel procedures for 2 x J tables.
    Yanagawa T; Fujii Y; Mastuoka J
    Environ Health Perspect; 1994 Nov; 102 Suppl 8(Suppl 8):57-60. PubMed ID: 7851333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hierarchical modeling for estimating relative risks of rare genetic variants: properties of the pseudo-likelihood method.
    Capanu M; Begg CB
    Biometrics; 2011 Jun; 67(2):371-80. PubMed ID: 20707869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Odds ratio for 2 × 2 tables: Mantel-Haenszel estimator, profile likelihood, and presence of surrogate responses.
    Banerjee B; Biswas A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(3):649-59. PubMed ID: 24697719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating and correcting for confounder misclassification.
    Savitz DA; Barón AE
    Am J Epidemiol; 1989 May; 129(5):1062-71. PubMed ID: 2705426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Linear trend tests for case-control genetic association that incorporate random phenotype and genotype misclassification error.
    Gordon D; Haynes C; Yang Y; Kramer PL; Finch SJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 31(8):853-70. PubMed ID: 17565750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patterns of alcohol (especially wine) consumption and breast cancer risk: a case-control study among a population in Southern France.
    Bessaoud F; Daurès JP
    Ann Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 18(6):467-75. PubMed ID: 18440826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Alcohol and breast cancer in women: a pooled analysis of cohort studies.
    Smith-Warner SA; Spiegelman D; Yaun SS; van den Brandt PA; Folsom AR; Goldbohm RA; Graham S; Holmberg L; Howe GR; Marshall JR; Miller AB; Potter JD; Speizer FE; Willett WC; Wolk A; Hunter DJ
    JAMA; 1998 Feb; 279(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 9480365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Likelihood inference on the relative risk in split-cluster designs.
    Shoukri MM; Colak D; Donner A
    Clin Trials; 2011 Feb; 8(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 21335588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Full-likelihood approaches to misclassification of a binary exposure in matched case-control studies.
    Rice K
    Stat Med; 2003 Oct; 22(20):3177-94. PubMed ID: 14518022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.