These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26169644)
41. Evaluation of two flexible colonoscopy simulators and transfer of skills into clinical practice. Gomez PP; Willis RE; Van Sickle K J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(2):220-7. PubMed ID: 25239553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures. Kahi CJ; Ballard D; Shah AS; Mears R; Johnson CS Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):925-31. PubMed ID: 23472996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Evaluation of a novel tablet application for improvement in colonoscopy training and mentoring (with video). Laborde CJ; Bell CS; Slaughter JC; Valdastri P; Obstein KL Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Mar; 85(3):559-565.e1. PubMed ID: 27480289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening - is it effective in the hands of a general surgery resident? Matyja M; Pasternak A; Wysocki M; Pędziwiatr M; Szura M; Rembiasz K Pol Przegl Chir; 2018 Jun; 90(5):6-12. PubMed ID: 30426940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Evaluation of formal feedback on endoscopic competence among trainees: the EFFECT trial. Harewood GC; Murray F; Winder S; Patchett S Ir J Med Sci; 2008 Sep; 177(3):253-6. PubMed ID: 18584274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Intermediate-length colonoscope needs more training duration than long-length colonoscope. Kim YG; Kim KJ; Yang DH; Ye BD; Byeon JS; Myung SJ; Yang SK; Kim JH Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Aug; 49(8):1007-13. PubMed ID: 24957569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Procedure Delays and Time of Day Are Not Associated With Reductions in Quality of Screening Colonoscopies. Keswani RN; Gawron AJ; Cooper A; Liss DT Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 May; 14(5):723-8.e2. PubMed ID: 26538206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Quality indicators for colonoscopy: differences in polyp detection between endoscopists at one hospital]. van Lelyveld N; van Oijen MG; Schwartz MP Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2012; 156(24):A4219. PubMed ID: 22742441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Involvement of trainees in routine unsedated colonoscopy: review of a pilot experience. Leung FW; Aharonian HS; Guth PH; Chu SK; Nguyen BD; Simpson P Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Apr; 67(4):718-22. PubMed ID: 18374030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. An endoscopic quality improvement program improves detection of colorectal adenomas. Coe SG; Crook JE; Diehl NN; Wallace MB Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Feb; 108(2):219-26; quiz 227. PubMed ID: 23295274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Endoscopist characteristics that influence the quality of colonoscopy. Jover R; Zapater P; Bujanda L; Hernández V; Cubiella J; Pellisé M; Ponce M; Ono A; Lanas A; Seoane A; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Fernández-Díez S; Peris A; Nicolás-Pérez D; Murcia O; Castells A; Quintero E; Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 26845473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Differences in screening vs non-screening colonoscopy: scope for improvement? Ahmed S; Naumann DN; Karandikar S Colorectal Dis; 2016 Sep; 18(9):903-9. PubMed ID: 26850216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Diagnostic accuracy of narrow-band imaging and pit pattern analysis significantly improved for less-experienced endoscopists after an expanded training program. Higashi R; Uraoka T; Kato J; Kuwaki K; Ishikawa S; Saito Y; Matsuda T; Ikematsu H; Sano Y; Suzuki S; Murakami Y; Yamamoto K Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Jul; 72(1):127-35. PubMed ID: 20493482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]