163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26170066)
1. Impact of uncertain head tissue conductivity in the optimization of transcranial direct current stimulation for an auditory target.
Schmidt C; Wagner S; Burger M; Rienen Uv; Wolters CH
J Neural Eng; 2015 Aug; 12(4):046028. PubMed ID: 26170066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A principled approach to conductivity uncertainty analysis in electric field calculations.
Saturnino GB; Thielscher A; Madsen KH; Knösche TR; Weise K
Neuroimage; 2019 Mar; 188():821-834. PubMed ID: 30594684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Design of NIRS Probe Based on Computational Model to Find Out the Optimal Location for Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation.
Sharma G; Roy Chowdhury S
J Med Syst; 2018 Oct; 42(12):244. PubMed ID: 30374669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does participant's age impact on tDCS induced fields? Insights from computational simulations.
McCann H; Beltrachini L
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Jun; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 34038881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Excitability changes induced in the human auditory cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation: direct electrophysiological evidence.
Zaehle T; Beretta M; Jäncke L; Herrmann CS; Sandmann P
Exp Brain Res; 2011 Nov; 215(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 21964868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The New York Head-A precise standardized volume conductor model for EEG source localization and tES targeting.
Huang Y; Parra LC; Haufe S
Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 140():150-62. PubMed ID: 26706450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The value and cost of complexity in predictive modelling: role of tissue anisotropic conductivity and fibre tracts in neuromodulation.
Shahid SS; Bikson M; Salman H; Wen P; Ahfock T
J Neural Eng; 2014 Jun; 11(3):036002. PubMed ID: 24737098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigation of tDCS volume conduction effects in a highly realistic head model.
Wagner S; Rampersad SM; Aydin Ü; Vorwerk J; Oostendorp TF; Neuling T; Herrmann CS; Stegeman DF; Wolters CH
J Neural Eng; 2014 Feb; 11(1):016002. PubMed ID: 24310982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on MMN-indexed auditory sensory processing.
Impey D; de la Salle S; Knott V
Brain Cogn; 2016 Jun; 105():46-54. PubMed ID: 27054908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electric field and current density distribution in an anatomical head model during transcranial direct current stimulation for tinnitus treatment.
Parazzini M; Fiocchi S; Ravazzani P
Bioelectromagnetics; 2012 Sep; 33(6):476-87. PubMed ID: 22298345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimization of focality and direction in dense electrode array transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).
Guler S; Dannhauer M; Erem B; Macleod R; Tucker D; Turovets S; Luu P; Erdogmus D; Brooks DH
J Neural Eng; 2016 Jun; 13(3):036020. PubMed ID: 27152752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Individually optimized multi-channel tDCS for targeting somatosensory cortex.
Khan A; Antonakakis M; Vogenauer N; Haueisen J; Wolters CH
Clin Neurophysiol; 2022 Feb; 134():9-26. PubMed ID: 34923283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changing head model extent affects finite element predictions of transcranial direct current stimulation distributions.
Indahlastari A; Chauhan M; Schwartz B; Sadleir RJ
J Neural Eng; 2016 Dec; 13(6):066006. PubMed ID: 27705955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inhibitory effect of tDCS on auditory evoked response: Simultaneous MEG-tDCS reveals causal role of right auditory cortex in pitch learning.
Matsushita R; Puschmann S; Baillet S; Zatorre RJ
Neuroimage; 2021 Jun; 233():117915. PubMed ID: 33652144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modulation of temporal resolution and speech long-latency auditory-evoked potentials by transcranial direct current stimulation in children and adolescents with dyslexia.
Rahimi V; Mohamadkhani G; Alaghband-Rad J; Kermani FR; Nikfarjad H; Marofizade S
Exp Brain Res; 2019 Mar; 237(3):873-882. PubMed ID: 30635704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using reciprocity for relating the simulation of transcranial current stimulation to the EEG forward problem.
Wagner S; Lucka F; Vorwerk J; Herrmann CS; Nolte G; Burger M; Wolters CH
Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 140():163-73. PubMed ID: 27125841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can individually targeted and optimized multi-channel tDCS outperform standard bipolar tDCS in stimulating the primary somatosensory cortex?
Khan A; Antonakakis M; Suntrup-Krueger S; Lencer R; Nitsche MA; Paulus W; Groß J; Wolters CH
Brain Stimul; 2023; 16(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 36526154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cortical Excitability through Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: a Computational Approach.
Arora Y; Chowdhury SR
J Med Syst; 2020 Jan; 44(2):48. PubMed ID: 31900599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) elicits stimulus-specific enhancement of cortical plasticity.
Boroda E; Sponheim SR; Fiecas M; Lim KO
Neuroimage; 2020 May; 211():116598. PubMed ID: 32032738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of large structural brain changes in chronic stroke patients on the electric field caused by transcranial brain stimulation.
Minjoli S; Saturnino GB; Blicher JU; Stagg CJ; Siebner HR; Antunes A; Thielscher A
Neuroimage Clin; 2017; 15():106-117. PubMed ID: 28516033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
