194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26171732)
1. Validation of the AGDISP model for predicting airborne atrazine spray drift: A South African ground application case study.
Nsibande SA; Dabrowski JM; van der Walt E; Venter A; Forbes PB
Chemosphere; 2015 Nov; 138():454-61. PubMed ID: 26171732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of the entrained air and initial droplet velocity on the release height parameter of a Gaussian spray drift model.
Stainier C; Destain MF; Schiffers B; Lebeau F
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2006; 71(2 Pt A):197-200. PubMed ID: 17390793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Winds of change, developing a non-target plant bioassay employing field-based pesticide drift exposure: A case study with atrazine.
Brain R; Goodwin G; Abi-Akar F; Lee B; Rodgers C; Flatt B; Lynn A; Kruger G; Perkins D
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Aug; 678():239-252. PubMed ID: 31075591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The agricultural dispersal-valley drift spray drift modeling system compared with pesticide drift data.
Allwine KJ; Thistle HW; Teske ME; Anhold J
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2002 May; 21(5):1085-90. PubMed ID: 12013131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Off-target loss in ornamental nurseries with different spray techniques.
Zhu H; Derksen RC; Krause CR; Zondag RH
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2009; 74(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 20218508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spray drift as affected by meteorological conditions.
Nuyttens D; Sonck B; de Schampheleire M; Steurbaut W; Baetens K; Verboven P; Nicolaï B; Ramon H
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):947-59. PubMed ID: 16628942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the AgDISP aerial spray algorithms in the AgDRIFT model.
Bird SL; Perry SG; Ray SL; Teske ME
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2002 Mar; 21(3):672-81. PubMed ID: 11878481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of spray drift- and runoff-related input of azinphos-methyl and endosulfan from fruit orchards into the Lourens River, South Africa.
Schulz R
Chemosphere; 2001 Nov; 45(4-5):543-51. PubMed ID: 11680750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Watershed-Scale Simulations of In-Stream Pesticide Concentrations from Off-Target Spray Drift.
Winchell MF; Pai N; Brayden BH; Stone C; Whatling P; Hanzas JP; Stryker JJ
J Environ Qual; 2018 Jan; 47(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 29415099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of air support on droplet characteristics and spray drift.
Nuyttens D; Dekeyser D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Sonck B
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2007; 72(2):71-9. PubMed ID: 18399426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 3: field drift experiments.
Nuyttens D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Dekeyser D; Sonck B
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):763-7. PubMed ID: 19226826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of realtime spray drift using RTDrift Gaussian advection-diffusion model.
Lebeau F; Verstraete A; Schiffers B; Destain MF
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2009; 74(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 20218507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Qualitative assessment of 27 current-use pesticides in air at 20 sampling sites across Africa.
Fuhrimann S; Klánová J; Přibylová P; Kohoutek J; Dalvie MA; Röösli M; Degrendele C
Chemosphere; 2020 Nov; 258():127333. PubMed ID: 32947666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Near-field air concentrations of pesticides in potato agriculture in Prince Edward Island.
Garron CA; Davis KC; Ernst WR
Pest Manag Sci; 2009 Jun; 65(6):688-96. PubMed ID: 19278022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Real-Time Monitoring of Spray Drift from Three Different Orchard Sprayers.
Blanco MN; Fenske RA; Kasner EJ; Yost MG; Seto E; Austin E
Chemosphere; 2019 May; 222():46-55. PubMed ID: 30690400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spray droplet size, drift potential, and risks to nontarget organisms from aerially applied glyphosate for coca control in Colombia.
Hewitt AJ; Solomon KR; Marshall EJ
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2009; 72(15-16):921-9. PubMed ID: 19672760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 4: a comparative study.
Nuyttens D; Baetens K; De Schampheleire M; Sonck B
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):769-74. PubMed ID: 19226827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and field validation of an indicator to assess the relative mobility and risk of pesticides in the Lourens River catchment, South Africa.
Dabrowski JM; Balderacchi M
Chemosphere; 2013 Nov; 93(10):2433-43. PubMed ID: 24059975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Primary and secondary pesticide drift profiles from a peach orchard.
Zivan O; Bohbot-Raviv Y; Dubowski Y
Chemosphere; 2017 Jun; 177():303-310. PubMed ID: 28314235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spray drift reduction under Southern European conditions: a pilot study in the Ecopest Project in Greece.
Kasiotis KM; Glass CR; Tsakirakis AN; Machera K
Sci Total Environ; 2014 May; 479-480():132-7. PubMed ID: 24561292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
