These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26171913)

  • 1. An Experimenting Field Approach for the Numerical Solution of Multiphase Flow in Porous Media.
    Salama A; Sun S; Bao K
    Ground Water; 2016 Mar; 54(2):262-73. PubMed ID: 26171913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Induced groundwater flux by increases in the aquifer's total stress.
    Chang CM; Yeh HD
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 25178834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of dispersivity coefficients by means of a laboratory image analysis.
    Citarella D; Cupola F; Tanda MG; Zanini A
    J Contam Hydrol; 2015 Jan; 172():10-23. PubMed ID: 25462639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a numerical simulation model for a system coupling atmospheric gas, surface water and unsaturated or saturated porous medium.
    Hibi Y; Tomigashi A; Hirose M
    J Contam Hydrol; 2015 Dec; 183():121-34. PubMed ID: 26583741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Calculating Groundwater Response Times for Flow in Heterogeneous Porous Media.
    Simpson MJ
    Ground Water; 2018 Mar; 56(2):337-342. PubMed ID: 28873497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Grid refinement in Cartesian coordinates for groundwater flow models using the divergence theorem and Taylor's series.
    Mansour MM; Spink AE
    Ground Water; 2013; 51(1):66-75. PubMed ID: 22409243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitivity analyses of the theoretical equations used in point velocity probe (PVP) data interpretation.
    Devlin JF
    J Contam Hydrol; 2016 Sep; 192():140-145. PubMed ID: 27454892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of unsaturated flow and solute transport through waste rock at two experimental scales using temporal moments and numerical modeling.
    Blackmore S; Smith L; Ulrich Mayer K; Beckie RD
    J Contam Hydrol; 2014 Dec; 171():49-65. PubMed ID: 25461887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental investigation of compound-specific dilution of solute plumes in saturated porous media: 2-D vs. 3-D flow-through systems.
    Ye Y; Chiogna G; Cirpka O; Grathwohl P; Rolle M
    J Contam Hydrol; 2015 Jan; 172():33-47. PubMed ID: 25462641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a coupled model for numerical simulation of a multiphase flow system in a porous medium and a surface fluid.
    Hibi Y; Tomigashi A
    J Contam Hydrol; 2015 Sep; 180():34-55. PubMed ID: 26255905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of boundary condition types on unstable density-dependent flow.
    Ataie-Ashtiani B; Simmons CT; Werner AD
    Ground Water; 2014; 52(3):378-87. PubMed ID: 23659688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pore-scale investigation of viscous coupling effects for two-phase flow in porous media.
    Li H; Pan C; Miller CT
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2005 Aug; 72(2 Pt 2):026705. PubMed ID: 16196749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determination of spatially-resolved porosity, tracer distributions and diffusion coefficients in porous media using MRI measurements and numerical simulations.
    Marica F; Jofré SA; Mayer KU; Balcom BJ; Al TA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2011 Jul; 125(1-4):47-56. PubMed ID: 21669472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Numerical investigation of nanoparticles transport in anisotropic porous media.
    Salama A; Negara A; El Amin M; Sun S
    J Contam Hydrol; 2015 Oct; 181():114-30. PubMed ID: 26212784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of water table fluctuation on LNAPL deposit in highly permeable porous media: A coupled numerical and experimental study.
    Koohbor B; Colombano S; Harrouet T; Deparis J; Lion F; Davarzani D; Ataie-Ashtiani B
    J Contam Hydrol; 2023 May; 256():104183. PubMed ID: 37116372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multi-component reactive transport in heterogeneous media and its decoupling solution.
    Huo JX; Song HZ; Wu ZW
    J Contam Hydrol; 2014 Oct; 166():11-22. PubMed ID: 25123631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigating the migration of immiscible contaminant fluid flow in homogeneous and heterogeneous aquifers with high-precision numerical simulations.
    Feo A; Celico F
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0266486. PubMed ID: 35468165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interface condition for the Darcy velocity at the water-oil flood front in the porous medium.
    Peng X; Liu Y; Liang B; Du Z
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177187. PubMed ID: 28542612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitivity of the solution of the Elder problem to density, velocity and numerical perturbations.
    Park CH; Aral MM
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Jun; 92(1-2):33-49. PubMed ID: 17222477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Studying the flow dynamics of a karst aquifer system with an equivalent porous medium model.
    Abusaada M; Sauter M
    Ground Water; 2013; 51(4):641-50. PubMed ID: 23039080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.