These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Optimal SPECT processing and display: making bad studies look good to get the right answer. Ibrahim DY; DiFilippo FP; Steed JE; Cerqueira MD J Nucl Cardiol; 2006 Nov; 13(6):855-66. PubMed ID: 17174816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Lung artefacts and their use. Dietrich CF; Mathis G; Blaivas M; Volpicelli G; Seibel A; Atkinson NS; Cui XW; Mei F; Schreiber-Dietrich D; Yi D Med Ultrason; 2016 Dec; 18(4):488-499. PubMed ID: 27981283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The feasibility of real-time transmission of sonographic images from a remote location over low-bandwidth Internet links: a pilot study. Popov V; Popov D; Kacar I; Harris RD AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):W219-22. PubMed ID: 17312026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MR neurography: pitfalls in imaging and interpretation. Andreisek G; Chhabra A Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2015 Apr; 19(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 25764233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Requirements for optimum use of advanced image visualization tools. Khorasani R J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Aug; 4(8):525-6. PubMed ID: 17660114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Enhancement of ultrasound images using stochastic resonance-based wavelet transform. Rallabandi VP Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Jun; 32(4):316-20. PubMed ID: 18378117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cross-Sectional Imaging of Renal Masses: Image Interpretation-Related Potential Pitfalls and Possible Solutions. Katabathina VS; Shiao J; Flaherty E; Prasad SR Semin Roentgenol; 2016 Jan; 51(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 27020235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Common pitfalls in paediatric abdominal imaging. Daneman A; Navarro OM Pediatr Radiol; 2009 Jun; 39 Suppl 3():369-71. PubMed ID: 19440755 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultrasound-modulated bioluminescence tomography. Bal G; Schotland JC Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2014 Mar; 89(3):031201. PubMed ID: 24730782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A response to: A critical review and uniformized representation of statistical distributions modeling the ultrasound echo envelope. Nillesen MM; Lopata RG; Thijssen JM; Kapusta L; de Korte CL Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Apr; 37(4):674; author reply 675-6. PubMed ID: 21208734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Presentation of 3D isotropic imaging data for optimal viewing. Henkelman RM; Baghdadi L; Sled JG Magn Reson Med; 2006 Dec; 56(6):1371-4. PubMed ID: 17075854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interactive knee cartilage extraction using efficient segmentation software: data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Gan HS; Tan TS; Wong LX; Tham WK; Sayuti KA; Abdul Karim AH; bin Abdul Kadir MR Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):3145-57. PubMed ID: 25227024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. VIEWDEX: an efficient and easy-to-use software for observer performance studies. Håkansson M; Svensson S; Zachrisson S; Svalkvist A; Båth M; Månsson LG Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):42-51. PubMed ID: 20200105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An adaptive squared-distance-weighted interpolation for volume reconstruction in 3D freehand ultrasound. Huang QH; Zheng YP Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e73-7. PubMed ID: 16844174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]