BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2617274)

  • 1. Osteoclast features of cells that resorb demineralized and mineral-containing bone implants in rats.
    Bagi CM; Miller SC
    Scanning Microsc; 1989 Sep; 3(3):963-8; discussion 969-70. PubMed ID: 2617274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The giant cells recruited by subcutaneous implants of mineralized bone particles and slices in rabbits are not osteoclasts.
    Marks SC; Chambers TJ
    J Bone Miner Res; 1991 Apr; 6(4):395-400. PubMed ID: 1830447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cellular events associated with the induction of bone by demineralized bone.
    Bernick S; Paule W; Ertl D; Nishimoto SK; Nimni ME
    J Orthop Res; 1989; 7(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 2642300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ultrastructure of the giant cell infiltrate of subcutaneously implanted bone particles in rats and mice.
    Popoff SN; Marks SC
    Am J Anat; 1986 Dec; 177(4):491-503. PubMed ID: 3544796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrastructure, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase activity and calcitonin responsiveness of osteoclasts at sites of demineralized bone matrix implant-induced osteogenesis.
    Bagi CM; Miller SC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Aug; (269):257-65. PubMed ID: 1864048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attachment to and phagocytosis of mineral by alveolar bone osteoclasts.
    Pierce AM
    J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol; 1989 Jan; 21(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 2702613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Morphological and histochemical comparison of the cells elicited by ectopic bone implants and tibial osteoclasts.
    Kelly JD; Schneider GB
    Am J Anat; 1991 Sep; 192(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 1750381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bone resorption by isolated osteoclasts in living versus devitalized bone: differences in mode and extent and the effects of human recombinant tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases.
    Shimizu H; Sakamoto M; Sakamoto S
    J Bone Miner Res; 1990 Apr; 5(4):411-8. PubMed ID: 2343781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation of an osteoclast antigen and ruffled border on giant cells formed in response to resorbable substrates.
    Webber D; Osdoby P; Hauschka P; Krukowski M
    J Bone Miner Res; 1990 Apr; 5(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 2343780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Osteoblast-like cells complete osteoclastic bone resorption and form new mineralized bone matrix in vitro.
    Mulari MT; Qu Q; Härkönen PL; Väänänen HK
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2004 Sep; 75(3):253-61. PubMed ID: 15148559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Osteoclasts are capable of particle phagocytosis and bone resorption.
    Wang W; Ferguson DJ; Quinn JM; Simpson AH; Athanasou NA
    J Pathol; 1997 May; 182(1):92-8. PubMed ID: 9227347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Association of giant multinucleated cells with deterioration of osteoinductive potency of bone matrix.
    Włodarski KH; Kobus M
    Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 1992; 40(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 1485833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Formation and resorption of bone induced by demineralized bone matrix implants in rats.
    Bauer FC; Nilsson OS; Törnkvist H
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1984 Dec; (191):139-43. PubMed ID: 6499305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Degradation of subcutaneous implants of bone particles from normal and warfarin-treated rats.
    Serre CM; Price P; Delmas PD
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Aug; 10(8):1158-67. PubMed ID: 8585418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multinucleated cells elicited in response to implants of devitalized bone particles possess receptors for calcitonin.
    Goldring SR; Roelke M; Glowacki J
    J Bone Miner Res; 1988 Feb; 3(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 2850723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response to demineralized bone matrix implantation in foals and adult horses.
    Douglas J; Clarke A
    Am J Vet Res; 1995 May; 56(5):649-55. PubMed ID: 7661462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro osteoclast resorption of bone substitute biomaterials used for implant site augmentation: a pilot study.
    Taylor JC; Cuff SE; Leger JP; Morra A; Anderson GI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):321-30. PubMed ID: 12074446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cellular biology and biochemical mechanism of bone resorption. A review of recent developments on the formation, activation, and mode of action of osteoclasts.
    Vaes G
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Jun; (231):239-71. PubMed ID: 3286076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interactions of cells in zones of bone resorption under microgravity and hypokinesia.
    Rodionova NV; Polkovenko OV; Oganov VS
    J Gravit Physiol; 2004 Jul; 11(2):P147-51. PubMed ID: 16237820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bone modelling in the implantation bed.
    Boyde A; Jones SJ
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1985 Mar; 19(3):199-224. PubMed ID: 3908456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.