315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26173007)
1. Sample Size Calculation: Inaccurate A Priori Assumptions for Nuisance Parameters Can Greatly Affect the Power of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Tavernier E; Giraudeau B
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132578. PubMed ID: 26173007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of nuisance parameters in pediatric versus adult randomized trials: a meta-epidemiologic empirical evaluation.
Vandermeer B; van der Tweel I; Jansen-van der Weide MC; Weinreich SS; Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG; Bassler D; Fernandes RM; Askie L; Saloojee H; Baiardi P; Ellenberg SS; van der Lee JH
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jan; 18(1):7. PubMed ID: 29321002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sample size adaptation in fixed-dose combination drug trial.
James Hung HM; Wang SJ
J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):679-86. PubMed ID: 22651108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Test equality and sample size calculation based on risk difference in a randomized clinical trial with noncompliance and missing outcomes.
Lui KJ; Chang KC
Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):224-36. PubMed ID: 18264992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sample size calculations for randomized clinical trials published in anesthesiology journals: a comparison of 2010 versus 2016.
Chow JTY; Turkstra TP; Yim E; Jones PM
Can J Anaesth; 2018 Jun; 65(6):611-618. PubMed ID: 29569142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robustness of methods for blinded sample size re-estimation with overdispersed count data.
Schneider S; Schmidli H; Friede T
Stat Med; 2013 Sep; 32(21):3623-35. PubMed ID: 23595966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sample size recalculation in multicenter randomized controlled clinical trials based on noncomparative data.
Harden M; Friede T
Biom J; 2020 Sep; 62(5):1284-1299. PubMed ID: 32128868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sample size reassessment in non-inferiority trials. Internal pilot study designs with ANCOVA.
Friede T; Kieser M
Methods Inf Med; 2011; 50(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 20213039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Blinded sample size recalculation in multicentre trials with normally distributed outcome.
Jensen K; Kieser M
Biom J; 2010 Jun; 52(3):377-99. PubMed ID: 20394080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sample size determination for assessing equivalence based on proportion ratio under a randomized trial with non-compliance and missing outcomes.
Lui KJ; Chang KC
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(1):47-67. PubMed ID: 17708514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sample size re-estimation in cluster randomization trials.
Lake S; Kammann E; Klar N; Betensky R
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(10):1337-50. PubMed ID: 12185888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sample size calculations in pediatric clinical trials conducted in an ICU: a systematic review.
Nikolakopoulos S; Roes KC; van der Lee JH; van der Tweel I
Trials; 2014 Jul; 15():274. PubMed ID: 25004909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sample size requirements to estimate key design parameters from external pilot randomised controlled trials: a simulation study.
Teare MD; Dimairo M; Shephard N; Hayman A; Whitehead A; Walters SJ
Trials; 2014 Jul; 15():264. PubMed ID: 24993581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Blinded sample size re-estimation in three-arm trials with 'gold standard' design.
Mütze T; Friede T
Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(23):3636-3653. PubMed ID: 28608469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Type II error and statistical power in reports of small animal clinical trials.
Giuffrida MA
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2014 May; 244(9):1075-80. PubMed ID: 24739118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sample size for testing difference between two proportions for the bilateral-sample design.
Qiu SF; Tang NS; Tang ML; Pei YB
J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Sep; 19(5):857-71. PubMed ID: 20183448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Statistical power, sample size, and their reporting in randomized controlled trials.
Moher D; Dulberg CS; Wells GA
JAMA; 1994 Jul; 272(2):122-4. PubMed ID: 8015121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomized controlled trials with time-to-event outcomes: how much does prespecified covariate adjustment increase power?
Hernández AV; Eijkemans MJ; Steyerberg EW
Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Jan; 16(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 16275011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving small-sample inference in group randomized trials with binary outcomes.
Westgate PM; Braun TM
Stat Med; 2011 Feb; 30(3):201-10. PubMed ID: 21213338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adaptive clinical endpoint bioequivalence studies with sample size re-estimation based on a nuisance parameter.
Zhu L; Sun W
J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(5):776-799. PubMed ID: 31505986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
