BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26173606)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of salpingotomy and salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (a randomized controlled trial).
    Mol F; van Mello NM; Strandell A; Jurkovic D; Ross JA; Yalcinkaya TM; Barnhart KT; Verhoeve HR; Graziosi GC; Koks CA; Mol BW; Ankum WM; van der Veen F; Hajenius PJ; van Wely M;
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Sep; 30(9):2038-47. PubMed ID: 26173606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Salpingotomy versus salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (ESEP study): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
    Mol F; van Mello NM; Strandell A; Strandell K; Jurkovic D; Ross J; Barnhart KT; Yalcinkaya TM; Verhoeve HR; Graziosi GCM; Koks CAM; Klinte I; Hogström L; Janssen ICAH; Kragt H; Hoek A; Trimbos-Kemper TCM; Broekmans FJM; Willemsen WNP; Ankum WM; Mol BW; van Wely M; van der Veen F; Hajenius PJ;
    Lancet; 2014 Apr; 383(9927):1483-1489. PubMed ID: 24499812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Salpingotomy or salpingectomy in tubal ectopic pregnancy: what do women prefer?
    van Mello NM; Mol F; Opmeer BC; de Bekker-Grob EW; Essink-Bot ML; Ankum WM; Mol BW; van der Veen F; Hajenius PJ
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Nov; 21(5):687-93. PubMed ID: 20884296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The ESEP study: salpingostomy versus salpingectomy for tubal ectopic pregnancy; the impact on future fertility: a randomised controlled trial.
    Mol F; Strandell A; Jurkovic D; Yalcinkaya T; Verhoeve HR; Koks CA; van der Linden PJ; Graziosi GC; Thurkow AL; Hoek A; Hogström L; Klinte I; Nilsson K; van Mello NM; Ankum WM; van der Veen F; Mol BW; Hajenius PJ;
    BMC Womens Health; 2008 Jun; 8():11. PubMed ID: 18582372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness analysis of medical management versus conservative surgery for early tubal pregnancy.
    Bourel G; Pelletier-Fleury N; Bouyer J; Delbarre A; Fernandez H; Capmas P
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Feb; 34(2):261-267. PubMed ID: 30520964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fertility outcomes after laparoscopic salpingectomy or salpingotomy for tubal ectopic pregnancy: A retrospective cohort study of 95 patients.
    Chen L; Zhu D; Wu Q; Yu Y
    Int J Surg; 2017 Dec; 48():59-63. PubMed ID: 28951291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is salpingostomy the surgical treatment of choice for unruptured tubal pregnancy?
    Rulin MC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Dec; 86(6):1010-3. PubMed ID: 7501323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is IVF-served two different ways-more cost-effective than IUI with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation?
    Tjon-Kon-Fat RI; Bensdorp AJ; Bossuyt PM; Koks C; Oosterhuis GJ; Hoek A; Hompes P; Broekmans FJ; Verhoeve HR; de Bruin JP; van Golde R; Repping S; Cohlen BJ; Lambers MD; van Bommel PF; Slappendel E; Perquin D; Smeenk J; Pelinck MJ; Gianotten J; Hoozemans DA; Maas JW; Groen H; Eijkemans MJ; van der Veen F; Mol BW; van Wely M
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Oct; 30(10):2331-9. PubMed ID: 26269539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hysteroscopic proximal tubal occlusion versus laparoscopic salpingectomy as a treatment for hydrosalpinges prior to IVF or ICSI: an RCT.
    Dreyer K; Lier MC; Emanuel MH; Twisk JW; Mol BW; Schats R; Hompes PG; Mijatovic V
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Sep; 31(9):2005-16. PubMed ID: 27209341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Salpingotomy versus salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy.
    Odejinmi F; Oliver R
    J Comp Eff Res; 2014 May; 3(3):241-3. PubMed ID: 24969151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical methods for tubal pregnancy - effects on ovarian response to controlled stimulation during IVF.
    Ödesjö E; Bergh C; Strandell A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Dec; 94(12):1322-6. PubMed ID: 26358274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the Fertility Outcome of Salpingotomy and Salpingectomy in Women with Tubal Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Cheng X; Tian X; Yan Z; Jia M; Deng J; Wang Y; Fan D
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0152343. PubMed ID: 27015601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fertility outcomes subsequent to treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy in younger Turkish women.
    Turan V
    J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 24(5):251-5. PubMed ID: 21715197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is serum human chorionic gonadotrophin follow-up necessary after suspected spillage of trophoblast at the time of laparoscopic surgery for ectopic pregnancy?
    Bora SA; Kirk E; Daemen A; Timmerman D; Bourne T
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2011; 71(4):225-8. PubMed ID: 21160149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Salpingotomy vs salpingectomy--a comparison of women's fertility after surgical treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy during a 24-month follow-up study].
    Kostrzewa M; Zyła M; Litwińska E; Kolasa-Zwierzchowska D; Szpakowski A; Stachowiak G; Szpakowski M; Wilczyński JR
    Ginekol Pol; 2013 Dec; 84(12):1030-5. PubMed ID: 24505950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors Predicting Persistent Ectopic Pregnancy After Laparoscopic Salpingostomy or Salpingotomy for Tubal Pregnancy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Ting WH; Lin HH; Hsiao SM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1036-1043. PubMed ID: 30312675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is conservative surgery for tubal pregnancy preferable to salpingectomy? An economic analysis.
    Mol BW; Hajenius PJ; Engelsbel S; Ankum WM; Hemrika DJ; van der Veen F; Bossuyt PM
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Jul; 104(7):834-9. PubMed ID: 9236650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy by salpingotomy with or without tubal suturing and salpingectomy.
    Tulandi T; Guralnick M
    Fertil Steril; 1991 Jan; 55(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 1986973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modified natural cycle versus controlled ovarian hyperstimulation IVF: a cost-effectiveness evaluation of three simulated treatment scenarios.
    Groen H; Tonch N; Simons AH; van der Veen F; Hoek A; Land JA
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Dec; 28(12):3236-46. PubMed ID: 24166594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of 'immediate IVF' versus 'delayed IVF': a prospective study.
    Eijkemans MJC; Kersten FAM; Lintsen AME; Hunault CC; Bouwmans CAM; Roijen LH; Habbema JDF; Braat DDM
    Hum Reprod; 2017 May; 32(5):999-1008. PubMed ID: 28204519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.