153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26173757)
1. Comparative analysis of cervical cytology screening methods and staining protocols for detection rate and accurate interpretation of ASC-H: Data from a high-volume laboratory in Turkey.
Ozlem A; Umit I
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Nov; 43(11):863-9. PubMed ID: 26173757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementation of the ThinPrep Imaging System in a tertiary military medical center.
Duby JM; DiFurio MJ
Cancer; 2009 Aug; 117(4):264-70. PubMed ID: 19536887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Significance of p16/Ki-67 double immunocytochemical staining in cervical cytology ASCUS, LSIL, and ASC-H].
Wu Y; Zhao J; Hu J; Wu XW; Zhu LR
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):734-739. PubMed ID: 29179267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of the Differences between Bethesda Groups according to Conventional Smear and Liquid-Based Cytology Methods in Cervicovaginal Cytology: A Single-Center Experience with 165,915 Cases.
Ucak R; Dilbaz OF; Polat N
Acta Cytol; 2024; 68(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 38320537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of an imaging system vs. manual screening in the detection of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix.
Dziura B; Quinn S; Richard K
Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(3):309-11. PubMed ID: 16780026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Thin Prep(®) imaging system on laboratory rate and relative sensitivity of atypical squamous cells, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion not excluded and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion interpretations.
Koltz BR; Russell DK; Lu N; Bonfiglio TA; Varghese S
Cytojournal; 2013; 10():6. PubMed ID: 23599725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Team Reading (Peer Review) of Suspicious/Positive Slides for Continuous Quality Improvement in Cervical-Vaginal Cytology: A Comparison between Methods and Indicators.
Placidi A; Capparucci P; Di Luzio A; Manca G; Mania E; Filippini T; Giorgi Rossi P
Acta Cytol; 2016; 60(5):458-464. PubMed ID: 27504992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patients with negative cervical biopsies after papanicolaou test interpretations of "atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion": comparative longitudinal follow-up.
Huitron S; Bonvicino A; Fadare O
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2008 Jun; 12(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 18486894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Silent High Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Atypical Smears from Liquid Based Cervical Cytology - Three Years Experience in Thammasat University Hospital.
Lertvutivivat S; Chanthasenanont A; Chanthasenanont A; Muangto T; Nanthakomon T; Pongrojpaw D; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(9):4353-4356. PubMed ID: 27797243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Liquid-based cytology--new possibilities in the diagnosis of cervical lesions.
Juric D; Mahovlić V; Rajhvajn S; Ovanin-Rakić A; Skopljanac-Macina L; Barisić A; Projić IS; Babić D; Susa M; Corusić A; Oresković S
Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 20432728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Overall accuracy of cervical cytology and clinicopathological significance of LSIL cells in ASC-H cytology.
Kim SH; Lee JM; Yun HG; Park US; Hwang SU; Pyo JS; Sohn JH
Cytopathology; 2017 Feb; 28(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 27245707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. ThinPrep versus conventional Papanicolaou smear in the cytologic follow-up of women with equivocal cervical smears.
Negri G; Menia E; Egarter-Vigl E; Vittadello F; Mian C
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):342-5. PubMed ID: 14681941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality metrics in cervical cytopathology: A single institutional study.
Senthil Kumar D; Ravikumar G
Cytopathology; 2022 Mar; 33(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 34854153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of liquid-based Pap tests: comparison of concurrent liquid-based tests and cervical biopsies on 782 women with previously abnormal Pap smears.
Guo M; Hu L; Martin L; Liu S; Baliga M; Hughson MD
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 15839615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The significance of "low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion" as a distinct squamous abnormality category in Papanicolaou tests.
Elsheikh TM; Kirkpatrick JL; Wu HH
Cancer; 2006 Oct; 108(5):277-81. PubMed ID: 16937376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of the ThinPrep Imaging System in the detection of abnormal cervicovaginal cytology: a practical experience in Korea.
Ha SY; Lee YK; Oh YL
Acta Cytol; 2013; 57(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 23406895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adjunctive human papillomavirus DNA testing is a useful option in some clinical settings for disease risk assessment and triage of females with ASC-H Papanicolaou test results.
Bandyopadhyay S; Austin RM; Dabbs D; Zhao C
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2008 Dec; 132(12):1874-81. PubMed ID: 19061283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical importance of "low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL-H)" terminology for cervical smears 5-year analysis of the positive predictive value of LSIL-H compared with ASC-H, LSIL, and HSIL in the detection of high-grade cervical lesions with a review of the literature.
Ince U; Aydin O; Peker O
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Apr; 121(1):152-6. PubMed ID: 21211831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefit and burden in the Dutch cytology-based vs high-risk human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening program.
Loopik DL; Koenjer LM; Siebers AG; Melchers WJG; Bekkers RLM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 224(2):200.e1-200.e9. PubMed ID: 32800820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reporting of atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H) on cervical samples: is it significant?
Selvaggi SM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jul; 29(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 12827715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
