These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26174079)

  • 21. Clinical evaluation of an all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions with different degrees of dentin sclerosis.
    Ritter AV; Heymann HO; Swift EJ; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(4):370-8. PubMed ID: 18666493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical evaluation of a self-etch adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Abdalla AI; El Sayed HY
    Am J Dent; 2008 Oct; 21(5):327-30. PubMed ID: 19024260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Three-year clinical performance of a HEMA-free one-step self-etch adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Van Landuyt KL; Peumans M; De Munck J; Cardoso MV; Ermis B; Van Meerbeek B
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2011 Dec; 119(6):511-6. PubMed ID: 22112039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Two-year clinical performance of a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions: Influence of subject's age and dentin etching time.
    Farias DC; Lopes GC; Baratieri LN
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Nov; 19(8):1867-74. PubMed ID: 25609033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Two-year clinical trial of a universal adhesive in total-etch and self-etch mode in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Lawson NC; Robles A; Fu CC; Lin CP; Sawlani K; Burgess JO
    J Dent; 2015 Oct; 43(10):1229-34. PubMed ID: 26231300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of operator experience on non-carious cervical lesion restorations: Clinical evaluation with different adhesive systems.
    Scotti N; Comba A; Gambino A; Manzon E; Breschi L; Paolino D; Pasqualini D; Berutti E
    Am J Dent; 2016 Feb; 29(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 27093774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation.
    Mena-Serrano A; Kose C; De Paula EA; Tay LY; Reis A; Loguercio AD; Perdigão J
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Feb; 25(1):55-69. PubMed ID: 23374411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. 24-month clinical evaluation in non-carious cervical lesions of a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive applied using a rubbing motion.
    Loguercio AD; Raffo J; Bassani F; Balestrini H; Santo D; do Amaral RC; Reis A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Aug; 15(4):589-96. PubMed ID: 20405185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical evaluation of self-etch adhesives in Class V non-carious lesions.
    Abdalla AI; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):289-92. PubMed ID: 17073206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Two-year clinical performance of Clearfil SE and Clearfil S3 in restoration of unabraded non-carious class V lesions.
    Brackett MG; Dib A; Franco G; Estrada BE; Brackett WW
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 20533626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies: 18-month results.
    Perdigão J; Dutra-Corrêa M; Saraceni CH; Ciaramicoli MT; Kiyan VH; Queiroz CS
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 21942235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel.
    Van Meerbeek B; Kanumilli P; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Lambrechts P; Peumans M
    Dent Mater; 2005 Apr; 21(4):375-83. PubMed ID: 15766585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A 36-month clinical evaluation of ethanol/water and acetone-based etch-and-rinse adhesives in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Reis A; Loguercio AD
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(4):384-91. PubMed ID: 19678442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Five-year clinical evaluation of two adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Kubo S; Kawasaki K; Yokota H; Hayashi Y
    J Dent; 2006 Feb; 34(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 15978714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Three-year clinical evaluation of a flowable and a hybrid resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Kubo S; Yokota H; Yokota H; Hayashi Y
    J Dent; 2010 Mar; 38(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 19840829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A randomized clinical evaluation of a one- and two-step self-etch adhesive over 24 months.
    Loguercio AD; Mânica D; Ferneda F; Zander-Grande C; Amaral R; Stanislawczuk R; de Carvalho RM; Manso A; Reis A
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 20533625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Five year evaluation of class III composite resin restorations in cavities pre-treated with an oxalic- or a phosphoric acid conditioner.
    van Dijken JW; Olofsson AL; Holm C
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 May; 26(5):364-71. PubMed ID: 10373082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A 7-year randomized prospective study of a one-step self-etching adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. The effect of curing modes and restorative material.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40(12):1060-7. PubMed ID: 22955004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of pattern of failure of resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions with and without occlusal wear facets.
    Oginni AO; Adeleke AA
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):824-30. PubMed ID: 24746714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.