232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26174283)
1. Promoting and evaluating scientific rigour in qualitative research.
Baillie L
Nurs Stand; 2015 Jul; 29(46):36-42. PubMed ID: 26174283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ensuring rigour and trustworthiness of qualitative research in clinical pharmacy.
Hadi MA; José Closs S
Int J Clin Pharm; 2016 Jun; 38(3):641-6. PubMed ID: 26666909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reflexivity: promoting rigour in qualitative research.
Jootun D; McGhee G; Marland GR
Nurs Stand; 2009 Feb 11-17; 23(23):42-6. PubMed ID: 19263905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evidence-based care: enhancing the rigour of a qualitative study.
McBrien B
Br J Nurs; 2008 Nov 13-26; 17(20):1286-9. PubMed ID: 19043334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework.
Tobin GA; Begley CM
J Adv Nurs; 2004 Nov; 48(4):388-96. PubMed ID: 15500533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Reflexivity and positionality tools to promote theoretical-methodological congruency on commencing a qualitative study].
Bover A
Enferm Clin; 2013; 23(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 23369490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enhancing rigour in qualitative health research: exploring subjectivity through Peshkin's I's.
Bradbury-Jones C
J Adv Nurs; 2007 Aug; 59(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 17590210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Establishing rigour in qualitative research: the decision trail.
Koch T
J Adv Nurs; 1994 May; 19(5):976-86. PubMed ID: 8056928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Understanding and evaluating qualitative research.
Fossey E; Harvey C; McDermott F; Davidson L
Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2002 Dec; 36(6):717-32. PubMed ID: 12406114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Critical appraisal of rigour in interpretive phenomenological nursing research.
de Witt L; Ploeg J
J Adv Nurs; 2006 Jul; 55(2):215-29. PubMed ID: 16866813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Criteria of scientific validity in research].
Pelletier C; Pagé G
Rech Soins Infirm; 2002 Mar; (68):35-42. PubMed ID: 12001625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The discourse of the criteria for quality in qualitative research].
Haas-Unmüssig P; Schmidt C
Pflege; 2010 Apr; 23(2):109-18. PubMed ID: 20361408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Introduction to qualitative research.
Ellett ML; Beausang CC
Gastroenterol Nurs; 2002; 25(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 11852825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mixed methods research.
Halcomb E; Hickman L
Nurs Stand; 2015 Apr; 29(32):41-7. PubMed ID: 25850508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rigour and grounded theory.
Cooney A
Nurse Res; 2011; 18(4):17-22. PubMed ID: 21853888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What is good qualitative research? A first step towards a comprehensive approach to judging rigour/quality.
Meyrick J
J Health Psychol; 2006 Sep; 11(5):799-808. PubMed ID: 16908474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability and validity in research.
Roberts P; Priest H
Nurs Stand; 2006 Jul 12-18; 20(44):41-5. PubMed ID: 16872117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Establishing methodological rigour in international qualitative nursing research: a case study from Ghana.
Mill JE; Ogilvie LD
J Adv Nurs; 2003 Jan; 41(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 12519291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Part II. rigour in qualitative research: complexities and solutions.
Tuckett AG
Nurse Res; 2005; 13(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16220839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Attempting rigour and replicability in thematic analysis of qualitative research data; a case study of codebook development.
Roberts K; Dowell A; Nie JB
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):66. PubMed ID: 30922220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
