135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26174615)
21. Open peer review: a first step.
Dougherty MC
Nurs Res; 2004; 53(4):213. PubMed ID: 15266157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Repetitive publication.
Prescrire Int; 2002 Aug; 11(60):125. PubMed ID: 12199275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The insularity bias.
Henderson A
Cortex; 2002 Jun; 38(3):421-4. PubMed ID: 12146673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Double-blinded manuscript review: Avoiding peer review bias.
Santos A; Morris DS; Rattan R; Zakrison T
J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2021 Jul; 91(1):e39-e42. PubMed ID: 33901050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Control of data, authorship, and responsibility for clinical trials publications.
Freeman WR
Ophthalmology; 2005 Sep; 112(9):1485-6. PubMed ID: 16139664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [Lessons learned from the coxibs' ups and downs. The journals must be tougher against referees and authors].
Milerad J
Lakartidningen; 2008 May 21-27; 105(21):1560-1. PubMed ID: 18574991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Reviewers, authors, and editors: balance of power.
Bressler NM
Arch Ophthalmol; 1999 Apr; 117(4):524-6. PubMed ID: 10206584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. A comparison of reports from referees chosen by authors or journal editors in the peer review process.
Earnshaw JJ; Farndon JR; Guillou PJ; Johnson CD; Murie JA; Murray GD
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2000 Apr; 82(4 Suppl):133-5. PubMed ID: 10889776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Biomedical publishing. Secretive and subjective, peer review proves resistant to study.
Couzin-Frankel J
Science; 2013 Sep; 341(6152):1331. PubMed ID: 24052283
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Reviewers' reports should in turn be peer reviewed.
List A
Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7098):26. PubMed ID: 16823432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The Importance of the Proper Definition of Adulthood: What is and What is Not Included in a Scientific Publication.
Canêo LF; Neirotti R
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg; 2017; 32(1):60. PubMed ID: 28423133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. What's next for Registered Reports?
Chambers C
Nature; 2019 Sep; 573(7773):187-189. PubMed ID: 31506624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Outcome-blinded peer review.
Mirkin JN; Bach PB
Arch Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 171(13):1213-4; author reply 1214. PubMed ID: 21747021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Financial conflicts of interest in the scientific publication world--and other good news.
Friedberg EC
DNA Repair (Amst); 2003 Nov; 2(11):1161. PubMed ID: 14599738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability.
Davidoff F; DeAngelis CD; Drazen JM; Hoey J; Højgaard L; Horton R; Kotzin S; Nicholls MG; Nylenna M; Overbeke AJ; Sox HC; Van der Weyden MB; Wilkes MS
Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 98(6):1143-6. PubMed ID: 11755568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Upon Further Review: Peer Process Vital to Publishing.
Katz A
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2016 Nov; 43(6):675-676. PubMed ID: 27768133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Author Modifications of Accepted Manuscripts and Galley Proofs: Sharing of Ideas on the Issue.
Wiwanitkit V
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Feb; 208(2):W59. PubMed ID: 27809559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Responsibilities of authorship.
Kane B
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 1998; 5(1):133. PubMed ID: 9452993
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Three-year trial shows support for recognizing peer reviewers.
Nature; 2019 Apr; 568(7752):275. PubMed ID: 30992584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Blinding of reviewers and authors.
Chapman S
Aust N Z J Public Health; 2003; 27(3):358. PubMed ID: 14705293
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
