These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26174615)
41. The impact of electronic publication and the E-journal on quality and the peer review process. Lee ST Ann Acad Med Singap; 1997 Jul; 26(4):393. PubMed ID: 9395796 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Peer review under scrutiny. Report on the third International Congress in Prague, 1997. Squires BP Can Fam Physician; 1998 Jan; 44():15-6, 21-3. PubMed ID: 9498914 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Next steps in the Schön affair. Kennedy D Science; 2002 Oct; 298(5593):495. PubMed ID: 12386303 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. "This Manuscript Was a Complete Waste of Time": Reviewer Etiquette Matters. Durning SJ; Sklar DP; Driessen EW; Maggio LA Acad Med; 2019 Jun; 94(6):744-745. PubMed ID: 31136334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Predatory publishing: What editors need to know. INANE Predatory Publishing Practices Collaborative CANNT J; 2015; 25(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 26882636 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Peer-reviewed publication: a view from inside. Fisher RS; Powers LE Epilepsia; 2004 Aug; 45(8):889-94. PubMed ID: 15270753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Reviewing the review process: towards good practice in the peer review of manuscripts submitted to nursing journals. Burnard P; Hannigan B Nurse Educ Today; 2001 Apr; 21(3):238-42. PubMed ID: 11322816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The do's and don't's of submitting scientific papers. Walsh PJ; Mommsen TP; Nilsson GE Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol; 2009 Mar; 152(3):203-4. PubMed ID: 19146976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]