1081 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26174714)
1. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares.
Li CH
Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):936-49. PubMed ID: 26174714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The performance of ML, DWLS, and ULS estimation with robust corrections in structural equation models with ordinal variables.
Li CH
Psychol Methods; 2016 Sep; 21(3):369-87. PubMed ID: 27571021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Statistical estimation of structural equation models with a mixture of continuous and categorical observed variables.
Li CH
Behav Res Methods; 2021 Oct; 53(5):2191-2213. PubMed ID: 33791955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Monte Carlo study comparing PIV, ULS and DWLS in the estimation of dichotomous confirmatory factor analysis.
Nestler S
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Feb; 66(1):127-43. PubMed ID: 22524532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions.
Rhemtulla M; Brosseau-Liard PÉ; Savalei V
Psychol Methods; 2012 Sep; 17(3):354-73. PubMed ID: 22799625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robustness of Parameter Estimation to Assumptions of Normality in the Multidimensional Graded Response Model.
Wang C; Su S; Weiss DJ
Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(3):403-418. PubMed ID: 29624093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating FIML and multiple imputation in joint ordinal-continuous measurements models with missing data.
Lim AJ; Cheung MW
Behav Res Methods; 2022 Jun; 54(3):1063-1077. PubMed ID: 34545537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Comparative Study on the Performance of GSCA and CSA in Parameter Recovery for Structural Equation Models With Ordinal Observed Variables.
Jung K; Panko P; Lee J; Hwang H
Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2461. PubMed ID: 30568625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysing multitrait-multimethod data with structural equation models for ordinal variables applying the WLSMV estimator: what sample size is needed for valid results?
Nussbeck FW; Eid M; Lischetzke T
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 May; 59(Pt 1):195-213. PubMed ID: 16709286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. More efficient parameter estimates for factor analysis of ordinal variables by ridge generalized least squares.
Yuan KH; Jiang G; Cheng Y
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Nov; 70(3):525-564. PubMed ID: 28547838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data.
Flora DB; Curran PJ
Psychol Methods; 2004 Dec; 9(4):466-91. PubMed ID: 15598100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The performance of robust test statistics with categorical data.
Savalei V; Rhemtulla M
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):201-23. PubMed ID: 22568535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of alternative estimation methods in confirmatory factor analyses of the General Health Questionnaire.
Wang WC; Cunningham EG
Psychol Rep; 2005 Aug; 97(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 16279297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fitting Large Factor Analysis Models With Ordinal Data.
DiStefano C; McDaniel HL; Zhang L; Shi D; Jiang Z
Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Jun; 79(3):417-436. PubMed ID: 31105317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Impact of Model Parameterization and Estimation Methods on Tests of Measurement Invariance With Ordered Polytomous Data.
Koziol NA; Bovaird JA
Educ Psychol Meas; 2018 Apr; 78(2):272-296. PubMed ID: 29795956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Comparison of ML, WLSMV, and Bayesian Methods for Multilevel Structural Equation Models in Small Samples: A Simulation Study.
Holtmann J; Koch T; Lochner K; Eid M
Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(5):661-680. PubMed ID: 27594086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pairwise Likelihood Ratio Tests and Model Selection Criteria for Structural Equation Models with Ordinal Variables.
Katsikatsou M; Moustaki I
Psychometrika; 2016 Dec; 81(4):1046-1068. PubMed ID: 27734296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Scaled test statistics and robust standard errors for non-normal data in covariance structure analysis: a Monte Carlo study.
Chou CP; Bentler PM; Satorra A
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 1991 Nov; 44 ( Pt 2)():347-57. PubMed ID: 1772802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing interval estimates for small sample ordinal CFA models.
Natesan P
Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1599. PubMed ID: 26579002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Expected versus observed information in SEM with incomplete normal and nonnormal data.
Savalei V
Psychol Methods; 2010 Dec; 15(4):352-67. PubMed ID: 20853954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
