242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26174757)
1. Aortic Measurements in Patients with Aortopathy are Larger and More Reproducible by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Compared with Echocardiography.
Nejatian A; Yu J; Geva T; White MT; Prakash A
Pediatr Cardiol; 2015 Dec; 36(8):1761-73. PubMed ID: 26174757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of asymmetry on measurements of the aortic root using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with a bicuspid aortic valve.
Torres FS; Windram JD; Bradley TJ; Wintersperger BJ; Menezes R; Crean AM; Colman JM; Silversides CK; Wald RM
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec; 29(8):1769-77. PubMed ID: 23907165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transthoracic Echocardiography versus Computed Tomography for Ascending Aortic Measurements in Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valve.
Park JY; Foley TA; Bonnichsen CR; Maurer MJ; Goergen KM; Nkomo VT; Enriquez-Sarano M; Williamson EE; Michelena HI
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2017 Jul; 30(7):625-635. PubMed ID: 28501375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implications of Asymmetry and Valvular Morphotype on Echocardiographic Measurements of the Aortic Root in Bicuspid Aortic Valve.
Vis JC; Rodríguez-Palomares JF; Teixidó-Tura G; Galian-Gay L; Granato C; Guala A; Sao-Aviles A; Gutiérrez L; González-Alujas T; García-Dorado D; Evangelista A
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2019 Jan; 32(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 30269911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ascending aortic diameters in congenital aortic stenosis: cardiac magnetic resonance versus transthoracic echocardiography.
van der Linde D; Rossi A; Yap SC; McGhie JS; van den Bosch AE; Kirschbaum SW; Russo B; van Dijk AP; Moelker A; Krestin GP; van Geuns RJ; Roos-Hesselink JW
Echocardiography; 2013 May; 30(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 23305528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain in bicupsid aortic valve patients: head-to-head comparison between computed tomography, 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance and speckle-tracking echocardiography.
van den Hoven AT; Yilmazer S; Chelu RG; van Grootel RWJ; Minderhoud SCS; Bons LR; van Berendoncks AM; Duijnhouwer AL; Siebelink HJ; van den Bosch AE; Budde RPJ; Roos-Hesselink JW; Hirsch A
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Sep; 36(9):1771-1780. PubMed ID: 32451876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rapid ascending aorta stiffening in bicuspid aortic valve on serial cardiovascular magnetic resonance evaluation: comparison with connective tissue disorders.
Perez-Casares A; Dionne A; Gauvreau K; Prakash A
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2021 Feb; 23(1):11. PubMed ID: 33618720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multimodality imaging in bicuspid aortic valve.
Galian-Gay L; Rodríguez-Palomares J; Guala A; Michelena HI; Evangelista A
Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2020; 63(4):442-451. PubMed ID: 32531300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing imaging modalities for screening aortic complications in patients with bicuspid aortic valve.
Tsai SF; Trivedi M; Daniels CJ
Congenit Heart Dis; 2012; 7(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 22691072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 2D cine vs. 3D self-navigated free-breathing high-resolution whole heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance for aortic root measurements in congenital heart disease.
Nussbaumer C; Bouchardy J; Blanche C; Piccini D; Pavon AG; Monney P; Stuber M; Schwitter J; Rutz T
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2021 May; 23(1):65. PubMed ID: 34039356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Association between bicuspid aortic valve phenotype and patterns of valvular dysfunction and bicuspid aortopathy: comprehensive evaluation using MDCT and echocardiography.
Kang JW; Song HG; Yang DH; Baek S; Kim DH; Song JM; Kang DH; Lim TH; Song JK
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Feb; 6(2):150-61. PubMed ID: 23489528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ascending aortic size in aortic coarctation depends on aortic valve morphology: Understanding the bicuspid valve phenotype.
Frandsen EL; Burchill LJ; Khan AM; Broberg CS
Int J Cardiol; 2018 Jan; 250():106-109. PubMed ID: 29169748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of Aortic Dilation on the Regional Aortic Stiffness of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Assessed by 4-Dimensional Flow Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: Comparison With Marfan Syndrome and Degenerative Aortic Aneurysm.
Guala A; Rodriguez-Palomares J; Dux-Santoy L; Teixido-Tura G; Maldonado G; Galian L; Huguet M; Valente F; Gutiérrez L; González-Alujas T; Johnson KM; Wieben O; Sao Avilés A; Garcia-Dorado D; Evangelista A
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jun; 12(6):1020-1029. PubMed ID: 29778849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Morphological assessment of the aortic valve using coronary computed tomography angiography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with intraoperative findings.
Lee SC; Ko SM; Song MG; Shin JK; Chee HK; Hwang HK
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jun; 28 Suppl 1():33-44. PubMed ID: 22592485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography.
Defrance C; Bollache E; Kachenoura N; Perdrix L; Hrynchyshyn N; Bruguière E; Redheuil A; Diebold B; Mousseaux E
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Sep; 5(5):604-12. PubMed ID: 22798520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Aortic valve-mediated wall shear stress is heterogeneous and predicts regional aortic elastic fiber thinning in bicuspid aortic valve-associated aortopathy.
Bollache E; Guzzardi DG; Sattari S; Olsen KE; Di Martino ES; Malaisrie SC; van Ooij P; Collins J; Carr J; McCarthy PM; Markl M; Barker AJ; Fedak PWM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Dec; 156(6):2112-2120.e2. PubMed ID: 30060930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Aortic stenosis assessment from the 3-chamber cine: Ratio of balanced steady-state-free-precession (bSSFP) blood signal between the aorta and left ventricle predicts severity.
Vimalesvaran K; Zaman S; Howard JP; Aziminia N; Giannoudi M; Procter H; Varela M; Uslu F; Ariff B; Linton N; Levelt E; Bharath AA; Cole GD
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2024 Summer; 26(1):100005. PubMed ID: 38211656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Aortopathy and regurgitation in bicuspid valve patients increase the risk of aortopathy in relatives.
Dayan V; Zuasnabar A; Citro R; Bossone E; Michelena HI; Parma G; Bellino M; Olascoaga A; Florio L; Body S;
Int J Cardiol; 2019 Jul; 286():117-120. PubMed ID: 30954286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Aortic regurgitation assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography: intermodality disagreement impacting on prediction of post-surgical left ventricular remodeling.
Neisius U; Tsao CW; Hauser TH; Patel AD; Pierce P; Ben-Assa E; Nezafat R; Manning WJ
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Jan; 36(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 31414256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and post-procedural aortic regurgitation: comparison among cardiovascular magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and echocardiography.
Jabbour A; Ismail TF; Moat N; Gulati A; Roussin I; Alpendurada F; Park B; Okoroafor F; Asgar A; Barker S; Davies S; Prasad SK; Rubens M; Mohiaddin RH
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Nov; 58(21):2165-73. PubMed ID: 22078422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
