These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26174936)

  • 1. Comparison of Informed Consent Preferences for Multiplex Genetic Carrier Screening among a Diverse Population.
    Reeves A; Trepanier A
    J Genet Couns; 2016 Feb; 25(1):166-78. PubMed ID: 26174936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Information preferences of high literacy pregnant women regarding informed consent models for genetic carrier screening.
    Ormond KE; Banuvar S; Daly A; Iris M; Minogue J; Elias S
    Patient Educ Couns; 2009 May; 75(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 19013744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding preferences regarding consent for pragmatic trials in acute care.
    Dickert NW; Wendler D; Devireddy CM; Goldkind SF; Ko YA; Speight CD; Kim SY
    Clin Trials; 2018 Dec; 15(6):567-578. PubMed ID: 30280582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What do patients prefer: informed consent models for genetic carrier testing.
    Ormond KE; Iris M; Banuvar S; Minogue J; Annas GJ; Elias S
    J Genet Couns; 2007 Aug; 16(4):539-50. PubMed ID: 17492496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sharing longitudinal, non-biological birth cohort data: a cross-sectional analysis of parent consent preferences.
    Manhas KP; Dodd SX; Page S; Letourneau N; Adair CE; Cui X; Tough SC
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2018 Nov; 18(1):97. PubMed ID: 30419910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decision-making for prenatal genetic screening: how will pregnant women navigate a growing number of aneuploidy and carrier screening options?
    Farrell RM; Pierce M; Collart C; Yao M; Coleridge M; Chien EK; Rose SS; Lintel M; Perni U; Edmonds BT
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Dec; 21(1):806. PubMed ID: 34863134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Antenatal thalassaemia carrier testing: women's perceptions of "information" and "consent".
    Ahmed S; Green J; Hewison J
    J Med Screen; 2005; 12(2):69-77. PubMed ID: 15949117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Informed consent in direct-to-consumer personal genome testing: the outline of a model between specific and generic consent.
    Bunnik EM; Janssens AC; Schermer MH
    Bioethics; 2014 Sep; 28(7):343-51. PubMed ID: 23137034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Defining reasonable patient standard and preference for shared decision making among patients undergoing anaesthesia in Singapore.
    Yek JL; Lee AK; Tan JA; Lin GY; Thamotharampillai T; Abdullah HR
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Feb; 18(1):6. PubMed ID: 28148256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Joint SOGC-CCMG Opinion for Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening: An Update for All Canadian Providers of Maternity and Reproductive Healthcare in the Era of Direct-to-Consumer Testing.
    Wilson RD; De Bie I; Armour CM; Brown RN; Campagnolo C; Carroll JC; Okun N; Nelson T; Zwingerman R; Audibert F; Brock JA; Brown RN; Campagnolo C; Carroll JC; De Bie I; Johnson JA; Okun N; Pastruck M; Vallée-Pouliot K; Wilson RD; Zwingerman R; Armour C; Chitayat D; De Bie I; Fernandez S; Kim R; Lavoie J; Leonard N; Nelson T; Taylor S; Van Allen M; Van Karnebeek C
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2016 Aug; 38(8):742-762.e3. PubMed ID: 27638987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Informed choice for newborn blood spot screening in the United Kingdom: a survey of parental perceptions.
    Nicholls SG; Southern KW
    Pediatrics; 2012 Dec; 130(6):e1527-33. PubMed ID: 23147970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adolescent and Parental Attitudes About Return of Genomic Research Results: Focus Group Findings Regarding Decisional Preferences.
    McGowan ML; Prows CA; DeJonckheere M; Brinkman WB; Vaughn L; Myers MF
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Oct; 13(4):371-382. PubMed ID: 29806518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pre- and post-testing counseling considerations for the provision of expanded carrier screening: exploration of European geneticists' views.
    Janssens S; Chokoshvili D; Vears DF; De Paepe A; Borry P
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Aug; 18(1):46. PubMed ID: 28764782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parents' Perspectives on Supporting Their Decision Making in Genome-Wide Sequencing.
    Li KC; Birch PH; Garrett BM; MacPhee M; Adam S; Friedman JM
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2016 May; 48(3):265-75. PubMed ID: 27061758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are midwifery clients in Ontario making informed choices about prenatal screening?
    Dixon V; Burton N
    Women Birth; 2014 Jun; 27(2):86-90. PubMed ID: 24656607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prenatal genetic carrier testing using triple disease screening.
    Eng CM; Schechter C; Robinowitz J; Fulop G; Burgert T; Levy B; Zinberg R; Desnick RJ
    JAMA; 1997 Oct; 278(15):1268-72. PubMed ID: 9333269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Patients' preferences for information in health care decision-making].
    Borracci RA; Manente D; Giorgi MA; Calderón G; Ciancio A; Doval HC
    Medicina (B Aires); 2012; 72(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 23089115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shared Decision Making, Fast and Slow: Implications for Informed Consent, Resource Utilization, and Patient Satisfaction in Orthopaedic Surgery.
    Bernstein J; Kupperman E; Kandel LA; Ahn J
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2016 Jul; 24(7):495-502. PubMed ID: 27227982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Considering consent: a structural equation modelling analysis of factors influencing decisional quality when accepting newborn screening.
    Nicholls SG; Southern KW
    J Inherit Metab Dis; 2014 Mar; 37(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 24043381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Community-based preferences for stool cards versus colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening.
    DeBourcy AC; Lichtenberger S; Felton S; Butterfield KT; Ahnen DJ; Denberg TD
    J Gen Intern Med; 2008 Feb; 23(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 18157581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.