These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Decision-making for prenatal genetic screening: how will pregnant women navigate a growing number of aneuploidy and carrier screening options? Farrell RM; Pierce M; Collart C; Yao M; Coleridge M; Chien EK; Rose SS; Lintel M; Perni U; Edmonds BT BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Dec; 21(1):806. PubMed ID: 34863134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Antenatal thalassaemia carrier testing: women's perceptions of "information" and "consent". Ahmed S; Green J; Hewison J J Med Screen; 2005; 12(2):69-77. PubMed ID: 15949117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Informed consent in direct-to-consumer personal genome testing: the outline of a model between specific and generic consent. Bunnik EM; Janssens AC; Schermer MH Bioethics; 2014 Sep; 28(7):343-51. PubMed ID: 23137034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Defining reasonable patient standard and preference for shared decision making among patients undergoing anaesthesia in Singapore. Yek JL; Lee AK; Tan JA; Lin GY; Thamotharampillai T; Abdullah HR BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Feb; 18(1):6. PubMed ID: 28148256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Joint SOGC-CCMG Opinion for Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening: An Update for All Canadian Providers of Maternity and Reproductive Healthcare in the Era of Direct-to-Consumer Testing. Wilson RD; De Bie I; Armour CM; Brown RN; Campagnolo C; Carroll JC; Okun N; Nelson T; Zwingerman R; Audibert F; Brock JA; Brown RN; Campagnolo C; Carroll JC; De Bie I; Johnson JA; Okun N; Pastruck M; Vallée-Pouliot K; Wilson RD; Zwingerman R; Armour C; Chitayat D; De Bie I; Fernandez S; Kim R; Lavoie J; Leonard N; Nelson T; Taylor S; Van Allen M; Van Karnebeek C J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2016 Aug; 38(8):742-762.e3. PubMed ID: 27638987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Informed choice for newborn blood spot screening in the United Kingdom: a survey of parental perceptions. Nicholls SG; Southern KW Pediatrics; 2012 Dec; 130(6):e1527-33. PubMed ID: 23147970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adolescent and Parental Attitudes About Return of Genomic Research Results: Focus Group Findings Regarding Decisional Preferences. McGowan ML; Prows CA; DeJonckheere M; Brinkman WB; Vaughn L; Myers MF J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Oct; 13(4):371-382. PubMed ID: 29806518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pre- and post-testing counseling considerations for the provision of expanded carrier screening: exploration of European geneticists' views. Janssens S; Chokoshvili D; Vears DF; De Paepe A; Borry P BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Aug; 18(1):46. PubMed ID: 28764782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Parents' Perspectives on Supporting Their Decision Making in Genome-Wide Sequencing. Li KC; Birch PH; Garrett BM; MacPhee M; Adam S; Friedman JM J Nurs Scholarsh; 2016 May; 48(3):265-75. PubMed ID: 27061758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are midwifery clients in Ontario making informed choices about prenatal screening? Dixon V; Burton N Women Birth; 2014 Jun; 27(2):86-90. PubMed ID: 24656607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]