These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26176297)

  • 1. AN APP for the Assessment of Pain Intensity: Validity Properties and Agreement of Pain Reports When Used with Young People.
    Sánchez-Rodríguez E; de la Vega R; Castarlenas E; Roset R; Miró J
    Pain Med; 2015 Oct; 16(10):1982-92. PubMed ID: 26176297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and testing of painometer: a smartphone app to assess pain intensity.
    de la Vega R; Roset R; Castarlenas E; Sánchez-Rodríguez E; Solé E; Miró J
    J Pain; 2014 Oct; 15(10):1001-7. PubMed ID: 24854065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the electronic measurement of pain intensity: Can we use different pain intensity scales interchangeably?
    Sánchez-Rodríguez E; Castarlenas E; de la Vega R; Roset R; Miró J
    J Health Psychol; 2017 Nov; 22(13):1658-1667. PubMed ID: 26966092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of four self-report scales of pain intensity in 6- to 8-year-old children.
    Sánchez-Rodríguez E; Miró J; Castarlenas E
    Pain; 2012 Aug; 153(8):1715-1719. PubMed ID: 22703691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is the verbal numerical rating scale a valid tool for assessing pain intensity in children below 8 years of age?
    Castarlenas E; Miró J; Sánchez-Rodríguez E
    J Pain; 2013 Mar; 14(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 23380267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Agreement between verbal and electronic versions of the numerical rating scale (NRS-11) when used to assess pain intensity in adolescents.
    Castarlenas E; Sánchez-Rodríguez E; Vega Rde L; Roset R; Miró J
    Clin J Pain; 2015 Mar; 31(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 24699160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The convergent validity of the Manchester Pain Scale.
    Lyon F; Boyd R; Mackway-Jones K
    Emerg Nurse; 2005 Apr; 13(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 15861613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the psychometric properties of 3 pain scales used in the pediatric emergency department: Visual Analogue Scale, Faces Pain Scale-Revised, and Colour Analogue Scale.
    Le May S; Ballard A; Khadra C; Gouin S; Plint AC; Villeneuve E; Mâsse B; Tsze DS; Neto G; Drendel AL; Auclair MC; McGrath PJ; Ali S
    Pain; 2018 Aug; 159(8):1508-1517. PubMed ID: 29608509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A smartphone version of the Faces Pain Scale-Revised and the Color Analog Scale for postoperative pain assessment in children.
    Sun T; West N; Ansermino JM; Montgomery CJ; Myers D; Dunsmuir D; Lauder GR; von Baeyer CL
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2015 Dec; 25(12):1264-73. PubMed ID: 26507916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of a Mobile Health Electronic Visual Analog Scale App With a Traditional Paper Visual Analog Scale for Pain Evaluation: Cross-Sectional Observational Study.
    Turnbull A; Sculley D; Escalona-Marfil C; Riu-Gispert L; Ruiz-Moreno J; Gironès X; Coda A
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Sep; 22(9):e18284. PubMed ID: 32940621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability and validity of the Faces and Word Descriptor Scales to measure procedural pain.
    Keck JF; Gerkensmeyer JE; Joyce BA; Schade JG
    J Pediatr Nurs; 1996 Dec; 11(6):368-74. PubMed ID: 8991337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of the validity and reliability of the University of Wisconsin Children's Hospital Pain scale for Preverbal and Nonverbal Children.
    Soetenga D; Frank J; Pellino TA
    Pediatr Nurs; 1999; 25(6):670-6. PubMed ID: 12024390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Postoperative pain intensity assessment: a comparison of four scales in Chinese adults.
    Li L; Liu X; Herr K
    Pain Med; 2007 Apr; 8(3):223-34. PubMed ID: 17371409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability and validity of the Faces Pain Scale with older adults.
    Kim EJ; Buschmann MT
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2006 May; 43(4):447-56. PubMed ID: 16510146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the 20-item Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (ChPASS-20).
    Wong WS; McCracken LM; Fielding R
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2012 Jun; 43(6):1131-40. PubMed ID: 22651953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The cognitive risk profile for pain: development of a self-report inventory for identifying beliefs and attitudes that interfere with pain management.
    Cook AJ; Degood DE
    Clin J Pain; 2006 May; 22(4):332-45. PubMed ID: 16691085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The evaluation of smartphone versions of the visual analogue scale and numeric rating scale as postoperative pain assessment tools: a prospective randomized trial.
    Chiu LYL; Sun T; Ree R; Dunsmuir D; Dotto A; Ansermino JM; Yarnold C
    Can J Anaesth; 2019 Jun; 66(6):706-715. PubMed ID: 30796700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and preference for a pain intensity scale for use with the elderly.
    Miró J; Huguet A; Nieto R; Paredes S; Baos J
    J Pain; 2005 Nov; 6(11):727-35. PubMed ID: 16275596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity of Simplified Versus Standard Self-Report Measures of Pain Intensity in Preschool-Aged Children Undergoing Venipuncture.
    Emmott AS; West N; Zhou G; Dunsmuir D; Montgomery CJ; Lauder GR; von Baeyer CL
    J Pain; 2017 May; 18(5):564-573. PubMed ID: 28069521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The evaluation of change in pain intensity: a comparison of the P4 and single-item numeric pain rating scales.
    Spadoni GF; Stratford PW; Solomon PE; Wishart LR
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2004 Apr; 34(4):187-93. PubMed ID: 15128188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.