These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26178780)

  • 1. Evaluation of peri-implant buccal bone by computed tomography: an experimental study.
    González-Martín O; Oteo C; Ortega R; Alandez J; Sanz M; Veltri M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Aug; 27(8):950-5. PubMed ID: 26178780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of measuring the cortical bone thickness adjacent to dental implants using cone beam computed tomography.
    Razavi T; Palmer RM; Davies J; Wilson R; Palmer PJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jul; 21(7):718-25. PubMed ID: 20636726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inaccuracy of buccal bone thickness estimation on cone-beam CT due to implant blooming: An ex-vivo study.
    Vanderstuyft T; Tarce M; Sanaan B; Jacobs R; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Quirynen M
    J Clin Periodontol; 2019 Nov; 46(11):1134-1143. PubMed ID: 31446644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Evaluation of Horizontal and Vertical Dimensional Changes in Buccal Peri-Implant Alveolar Bone and Soft Tissue: A 1-Year Prospective Clinical Study.
    Kaminaka A; Nakano T; Ono S; Kato T; Yatani H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():e576-85. PubMed ID: 25535809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography is limited at implant sites with a thin buccal bone: A laboratory study.
    Domic D; Bertl K; Ahmad S; Schropp L; Hellén-Halme K; Stavropoulos A
    J Periodontol; 2021 Apr; 92(4):592-601. PubMed ID: 32846005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of the sandwich bone augmentation technique in increasing buccal bone thickness during implant placement surgery: I. Clinical and radiographic parameters.
    Fu JH; Oh TJ; Benavides E; Rudek I; Wang HL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):458-67. PubMed ID: 23594026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-Dimensional buccal bone anatomy and aesthetic outcome of single dental implants replacing maxillary incisors.
    Veltri M; Ekestubbe A; Abrahamsson I; Wennström JL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Aug; 27(8):956-63. PubMed ID: 26178908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of regenerated buccal bone 5 years after simultaneous implant placement and guided bone regeneration procedures--a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Jung RE; Benic GI; Scherrer D; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 24299007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors affecting the accuracy of buccal alveolar bone height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Wood R; Sun Z; Chaudhry J; Tee BC; Kim DG; Leblebicioglu B; England G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Mar; 143(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 23452969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of buccal marginal alveolar peri-implant and periodontal defects using a cone beam CT system with and without the application of metal artefact reduction mode.
    Kamburoglu K; Kolsuz E; Murat S; Eren H; Yüksel S; Paksoy CS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(8):20130176. PubMed ID: 23956236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, dental magnetic resonance imaging, and intraoral radiography for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single zirconia implants-An in vitro study.
    Hilgenfeld T; Juerchott A; Deisenhofer UK; Krisam J; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Sep; 29(9):922-930. PubMed ID: 30112833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of CBCT images in the assessment of buccal marginal alveolar peri-implant defects: effect of field of view.
    Kamburoğlu K; Murat S; Kılıç C; Yüksel S; Avsever H; Farman A; Scarfe WC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(4):20130332. PubMed ID: 24645965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The outcome of oral implants placed in bone with limited bucco-oral dimensions: a 3-year follow-up study.
    Temmerman A; Keestra JA; Coucke W; Teughels W; Quirynen M
    J Clin Periodontol; 2015 Mar; 42(3):311-8. PubMed ID: 25682801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging.
    Timock AM; Cook V; McDonald T; Leo MC; Crowe J; Benninger BL; Covell DA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):734-44. PubMed ID: 22051495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary interradicular sites for mini-implant placement.
    Sawada K; Nakahara K; Matsunaga S; Abe S; Ide Y
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():1-7. PubMed ID: 22092972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of cone beam computed tomography and conventional periapical radiography at detecting peri-implant bone defects.
    Dave M; Davies J; Wilson R; Palmer R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):671-8. PubMed ID: 22458628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cone beam computed tomography artefacts around dental implants with different materials influencing the detection of peri-implant bone defects.
    Schriber M; Yeung AWK; Suter VGA; Buser D; Leung YY; Bornstein MM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Jul; 31(7):595-606. PubMed ID: 32147872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measurement of buccal bone volume of dental implants by means of cone-beam computed tomography.
    Shiratori LN; Marotti J; Yamanouchi J; Chilvarquer I; Contin I; Tortamano-Neto P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jul; 23(7):797-804. PubMed ID: 21631591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of peri-implant defects at titanium and zirconium dioxide implants by means of periapical radiographs and cone beam computed tomography: An in-vitro examination.
    Steiger-Ronay V; Krcmaric Z; Schmidlin PR; Sahrmann P; Wiedemeier DB; Benic GI
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 30387207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dimensions of buccal bone and mucosa at immediately placed implants after 7 years: a clinical and cone beam computed tomography study.
    Benic GI; Mokti M; Chen CJ; Weber HP; Hämmerle CH; Gallucci GO
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 May; 23(5):560-6. PubMed ID: 22093013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.