These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26179276)

  • 1. Health technology assessment on cervical cancer screening, 2000-2014.
    Lahue BJ; Baginska E; Li SS; Parisi M
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2015 Jan; 31(3):171-80. PubMed ID: 26179276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Health technology assessment report: Computer-assisted Pap test for cervical cancer screening].
    Della Palma P; Moresco L; Giorgi Rossi P
    Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(5 Suppl 3):e1-43. PubMed ID: 23139174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Appraisals by Health Technology Assessment Agencies of Economic Evaluations Submitted as Part of Reimbursement Dossiers for Oncology Treatments: Evidence from Canada, the UK, and Australia.
    Ball G; Levine MAH; Thabane L; Tarride JE
    Curr Oncol; 2022 Oct; 29(10):7624-7636. PubMed ID: 36290879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Value of databases other than medline for rapid health technology assessments.
    Lorenzetti DL; Topfer LA; Dennett L; Clement F
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2014 Apr; 30(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 24774535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A systematic review of economic evaluations in second and later lines of therapy for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.
    Jäkel A; Plested M; Dharamshi K; Modha R; Bridge S; Johns A
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Feb; 11(1):27-43. PubMed ID: 23329379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Health Technology Assessment for Molecular Diagnostics: Practices, Challenges, and Recommendations from the Medical Devices and Diagnostics Special Interest Group.
    Garfield S; Polisena J; S Spinner D; Postulka A; Y Lu C; Tiwana SK; Faulkner E; Poulios N; Zah V; Longacre M
    Value Health; 2016; 19(5):577-87. PubMed ID: 27565275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Health technology assessment of biosimilars worldwide: a scoping review.
    Ascef BO; Lopes ACF; de Soárez PC
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2020 Aug; 18(1):95. PubMed ID: 32843051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do the findings of case series studies vary significantly according to methodological characteristics?
    Dalziel K; Round A; Stein K; Garside R; Castelnuovo E; Payne L
    Health Technol Assess; 2005 Jan; 9(2):iii-iv, 1-146. PubMed ID: 15588556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recommendations in health technology assessments worldwide.
    Draborg E; Andersen CK
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 16571190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The HTA core model: a novel method for producing and reporting health technology assessments.
    Lampe K; Mäkelä M; Garrido MV; Anttila H; Autti-Rämö I; Hicks NJ; Hofmann B; Koivisto J; Kunz R; Kärki P; Malmivaara A; Meiesaar K; Reiman-Möttönen P; Norderhaug I; Pasternack I; Ruano-Ravina A; Räsänen P; Saalasti-Koskinen U; Saarni SI; Walin L; Kristensen FB;
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Dec; 25 Suppl 2():9-20. PubMed ID: 20030886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of conference abstracts and presentations with full-text articles in the health technology assessments of rapidly evolving technologies.
    Dundar Y; Dodd S; Dickson R; Walley T; Haycox A; Williamson PR
    Health Technol Assess; 2006 Feb; 10(5):iii-iv, ix-145. PubMed ID: 16487455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. International comparison of the definition and the practical application of health technology assessment.
    Draborg E; Gyrd-Hansen D; Poulsen PB; Horder M
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 15736519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Health technology assessment of public health interventions: an analysis of characteristics and comparison of methods-study protocol.
    Mathes T; Willms G; Polus S; Stegbauer C; Messer M; Klingler C; Ehrenreich H; Niebuhr D; Marckmann G; Gerhardus A; Pieper D
    Syst Rev; 2018 May; 7(1):79. PubMed ID: 29792224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Economic evaluations conducted by Canadian health technology assessment agencies: where do we stand?
    Tarride JE; McCarron CE; Lim M; Bowen JM; Blackhouse G; Hopkins R; O'Reilly D; Xie F; Goeree R
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):437-44. PubMed ID: 18828938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transferability of health technology assessment reports in Latin America: an exploratory survey of researchers and decision makers.
    Pichon-Riviere A; Augustovski F; García Martí S; Sullivan SD; Drummond M
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2012 Apr; 28(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 22559762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. HTA'd in the USA: A Comparison of ICER in the United States with NICE in England and Wales.
    Thokala P; Carlson JJ; Drummond M
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2020 Sep; 26(9):1162-1170. PubMed ID: 32857653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluations of public health interventions produced by health technology assessment agencies: A mapping review and analysis by type and evidence content.
    Cyr PR; Jain V; Chalkidou K; Ottersen T; Gopinathan U
    Health Policy; 2021 Aug; 125(8):1054-1064. PubMed ID: 34112508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of methods used in health technology assessments produced for the Medical Services Advisory Committee.
    Petherick ES; Villanueva EV; Dumville J; Bryan EJ; Dharmage S
    Med J Aust; 2007 Sep; 187(5):289-92. PubMed ID: 17767435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Linking the evidence: intermediate outcomes in medical test assessments.
    Staub LP; Dyer S; Lord SJ; Simes RJ
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2012 Jan; 28(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 22230006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.