BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26180755)

  • 21. Data-Adaptive Bias-Reduced Doubly Robust Estimation.
    Vermeulen K; Vansteelandt S
    Int J Biostat; 2016 May; 12(1):253-82. PubMed ID: 27227724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Doubly robust inference for targeted minimum loss-based estimation in randomized trials with missing outcome data.
    Díaz I; van der Laan MJ
    Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(24):3807-3819. PubMed ID: 28744883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Targeted minimum loss based estimator that outperforms a given estimator.
    Gruber S; van der Laan MJ
    Int J Biostat; 2012 May; 8(1):Article 11. PubMed ID: 22628356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Collaborative targeted maximum likelihood for time to event data.
    Stitelman OM; van der Laan MJ
    Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(1):Article 21. PubMed ID: 21969976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Targeted maximum likelihood estimation in safety analysis.
    Lendle SD; Fireman B; van der Laan MJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8 Suppl):S91-8. PubMed ID: 23849159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Population intervention causal effects based on stochastic interventions.
    Muñoz ID; van der Laan M
    Biometrics; 2012 Jun; 68(2):541-9. PubMed ID: 21977966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A targeted maximum likelihood estimator of a causal effect on a bounded continuous outcome.
    Gruber S; van der Laan MJ
    Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(1):Article 26. PubMed ID: 21731529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Nonparametric estimation of the causal effect of a stochastic threshold-based intervention.
    van der Laan L; Zhang W; Gilbert PB
    Biometrics; 2023 Jun; 79(2):1014-1028. PubMed ID: 35526218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Causal effect models for realistic individualized treatment and intention to treat rules.
    van der Laan MJ; Petersen ML
    Int J Biostat; 2007; 3(1):Article 3. PubMed ID: 19122793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Beyond the Mean: A Flexible Framework for Studying Causal Effects Using Linear Models.
    Gische C; Voelkle MC
    Psychometrika; 2022 Sep; 87(3):868-901. PubMed ID: 34894340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Targeted Learning of the Mean Outcome under an Optimal Dynamic Treatment Rule.
    van der Laan MJ; Luedtke AR
    J Causal Inference; 2015 Mar; 3(1):61-95. PubMed ID: 26236571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].
    ; ;
    Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi; 2024 Feb; 47(2):101-119. PubMed ID: 38309959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Semiparametric Estimation of the Impacts of Longitudinal Interventions on Adolescent Obesity using Targeted Maximum-Likelihood: Accessible Estimation with the ltmle Package.
    Decker AL; Hubbard A; Crespi CM; Seto EY; Wang MC
    J Causal Inference; 2014 Mar; 2(1):95-108. PubMed ID: 26046009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Estimators for the value of the optimal dynamic treatment rule with application to criminal justice interventions.
    Montoya LM; van der Laan MJ; Skeem JL; Petersen ML
    Int J Biostat; 2023 May; 19(1):239-259. PubMed ID: 35659857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Estimation of time-specific intervention effects on continuously distributed time-to-event outcomes by targeted maximum likelihood estimation.
    Rytgaard HCW; Eriksson F; van der Laan MJ
    Biometrics; 2023 Dec; 79(4):3038-3049. PubMed ID: 36988158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. One-Step Targeted Minimum Loss-based Estimation Based on Universal Least Favorable One-Dimensional Submodels.
    van der Laan M; Gruber S
    Int J Biostat; 2016 May; 12(1):351-78. PubMed ID: 27227728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluating the robustness of targeted maximum likelihood estimators via realistic simulations in nutrition intervention trials.
    Li H; Rosete S; Coyle J; Phillips RV; Hejazi NS; Malenica I; Arnold BF; Benjamin-Chung J; Mertens A; Colford JM; van der Laan MJ; Hubbard AE
    Stat Med; 2022 May; 41(12):2132-2165. PubMed ID: 35172378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Doubly Robust and Efficient Estimation of Marginal Structural Models for the Hazard Function.
    Zheng W; Petersen M; van der Laan MJ
    Int J Biostat; 2016 May; 12(1):233-52. PubMed ID: 27227723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Application of targeted maximum likelihood estimation in public health and epidemiological studies: a systematic review.
    Smith MJ; Phillips RV; Luque-Fernandez MA; Maringe C
    Ann Epidemiol; 2023 Oct; 86():34-48.e28. PubMed ID: 37343734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Auto-G-Computation of Causal Effects on a Network.
    Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ; Fulcher IR; Shpitser I
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2021; 116(534):833-844. PubMed ID: 34366505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.