61 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26180805)
41. An online quality assurance program for colposcopy in a population-based cervical screening setting in Italy: results on colposcopic impression.
Cristiani P; Costa S; Schincaglia P; Garutti P; de Bianchi PS; Naldoni C; Sideri M; Bucchi L
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2014 Oct; 18(4):309-13. PubMed ID: 24886869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Rationale and development of an on-line quality assurance programme for colposcopy in a population-based cervical screening setting in Italy.
Bucchi L; Cristiani P; Costa S; Schincaglia P; Garutti P; Sassoli de Bianchi P; Naldoni C; Olea O; Sideri M
BMC Health Serv Res; 2013 Jun; 13():237. PubMed ID: 23809615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Is the colposcopically directed punch biopsy a reliable diagnostic test in women with minor cytological lesions?
Moss EL; Hadden P; Douce G; Jones PW; Arbyn M; Redman CW
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2012 Oct; 16(4):421-6. PubMed ID: 22669079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Regardless of skill, performing more biopsies increases the sensitivity of colposcopy.
Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Burchette RJ; Hu S; Zhang X; Qiao YL
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2011 Jul; 15(3):180-8. PubMed ID: 21436729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The virtual slide in the promotion of cytologic and hystologic quality in oncologic screenings.
Bondi A; Pierotti P; Crucitti P; Lega S
Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2010; 46(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 20567065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Use of an expanded gold standard to estimate the accuracy of colposcopy and visual inspection with acetic acid.
Cagle AJ; Hu SY; Sellors JW; Bao YP; Lim JM; Li SM; Lewis K; Song Y; Ma JF; Pan QJ; Zhang WH; Zhao FH; Qiao YL
Int J Cancer; 2010 Jan; 126(1):156-61. PubMed ID: 19585573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Number of cervical biopsies and sensitivity of colposcopy.
Gage JC; Hanson VW; Abbey K; Dippery S; Gardner S; Kubota J; Schiffman M; Solomon D; Jeronimo J;
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 108(2):264-72. PubMed ID: 16880294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Colposcopy at a crossroads.
Jeronimo J; Schiffman M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 195(2):349-53. PubMed ID: 16677597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The distribution of neoplasia arising on the cervix: results from the ALTS trial.
Guido RS; Jeronimo J; Schiffman M; Solomon D;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Oct; 193(4):1331-7. PubMed ID: 16202722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Colposcopically directed biopsy, random cervical biopsy, and endocervical curettage in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II or worse.
Pretorius RG; Zhang WH; Belinson JL; Huang MN; Wu LY; Zhang X; Qiao YL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Aug; 191(2):430-4. PubMed ID: 15343217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Results of a randomized trial on the management of cytology interpretations of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
ASCUS-LSIL Traige Study (ALTS) Group
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1383-92. PubMed ID: 12824967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Independent determinants of inaccuracy of colposcopically directed punch biopsy of the cervix.
Costa S; Nuzzo MD; Rubino A; Rambelli V; Marinelli M; Santini D; Cristiani P; Bucchi L
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Jul; 90(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 12821342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Performance indicators of organized cervical screening in Romagna (Italy).
Bucchi L; Falcini F; Schincaglia P; Desiderio F; Bondi A; Farneti M; Casadei Giunchi D; Serafini M; Canuti D; Caprara L; Sabbadini F; Monari F; Sassoli P
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2003 Jun; 12(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 12771561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. International terminology of colposcopy: an updated report from the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy.
Walker P; Dexeus S; De Palo G; Barrasso R; Campion M; Girardi F; Jakob C; Roy M;
Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jan; 101(1):175-7. PubMed ID: 12517664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. The correlation between the grade of dyskaryosis on cervical smear, grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on punch biopsy and the final histological diagnosis on cone biopsies of the cervix.
Heatley MK; Bury JP
Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 9577735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Presurgical assessment and therapy of microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix.
Orlandi C; Costa S; Terzano P; Martinelli GN; Comerci G; Guerra B; Martellini L
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Nov; 59(2):255-60. PubMed ID: 7590483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). A new method of management for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Prendiville W; Cullimore J; Norman S
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Sep; 96(9):1054-60. PubMed ID: 2804007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Histological differences between colposcopic-directed biopsy and loop excision of the transformation zone (LETZ): a cause for concern.
Chappatte OA; Byrne DL; Raju KS; Nayagam M; Kenney A
Gynecol Oncol; 1991 Oct; 43(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 1959787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Colposcopically directed punch biopsy: a potentially misleading investigation.
Buxton EJ; Luesley DM; Shafi MI; Rollason M
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Dec; 98(12):1273-6. PubMed ID: 1777461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. CIN 3: the role of lesion size in invasion.
Tidbury P; Singer A; Jenkins D
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Jul; 99(7):583-6. PubMed ID: 1525100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
