669 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26182223)
21. Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients.
Sagara Y; Hara AK; Pavlicek W; Silva AC; Paden RG; Wu Q
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):713-9. PubMed ID: 20729451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Image comparative assessment using iterative reconstructions: clinical comparison of low-dose abdominal/pelvic computed tomography between adaptive statistical, model-based iterative reconstructions and traditional filtered back projection in 65 patients.
Vardhanabhuti V; Riordan RD; Mitchell GR; Hyde C; Roobottom CA
Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):209-16. PubMed ID: 24368613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Image Quality and Lesion Detection on Deep Learning Reconstruction and Iterative Reconstruction of Submillisievert Chest and Abdominal CT.
Singh R; Digumarthy SR; Muse VV; Kambadakone AR; Blake MA; Tabari A; Hoi Y; Akino N; Angel E; Madan R; Kalra MK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):566-573. PubMed ID: 31967501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Image quality of ct angiography using model-based iterative reconstruction in infants with congenital heart disease: Comparison with filtered back projection and hybrid iterative reconstruction.
Jia Q; Zhuang J; Jiang J; Li J; Huang M; Liang C
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jan; 86():190-197. PubMed ID: 28027746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Iterative Model Reconstruction (IMR) in MDCT Below 2 mSv for the Detection of Urinary Calculi: Diagnostic Accuracy and Image Quality in Comparison to Filtered Back-Projection and 4th Generation Iterative Reconstruction (iDose4).
Schmidt-Holtz J; Laqmani A; Butscheidt S; Kurfürst M; Avanesov M; Behzadi C; Spink C; Veldhoen S; Nagel HD; Adam G; Regier M
Rofo; 2018 Jul; 190(7):630-636. PubMed ID: 29966156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography.
Chang W; Lee JM; Lee K; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Han JK; Choi BI
Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):598-606. PubMed ID: 23511193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of Knowledge-based Iterative Model Reconstruction and Hybrid Reconstruction Techniques for Liver CT Evaluation of Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Park HJ; Lee JM; Park SB; Lee JB; Jeong YK; Yoon JH
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(6):863-871. PubMed ID: 27331929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Performance of iterative reconstruction and automated tube voltage selection on the image quality and radiation dose in abdominal CT scans.
Desai GS; Fuentes Orrego JM; Kambadakone AR; Sahani DV
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(6):897-903. PubMed ID: 24270111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Radiation dose reduction with hybrid iterative reconstruction for pediatric CT.
Singh S; Kalra MK; Shenoy-Bhangle AS; Saini A; Gervais DA; Westra SJ; Thrall JH
Radiology; 2012 May; 263(2):537-46. PubMed ID: 22517962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Dose-modified 256-MDCT of the abdomen using low tube current and hybrid iterative reconstruction.
Fuentes-Orrego JM; Hayano K; Kambadakone AR; Hahn PF; Sahani DV
Acad Radiol; 2013 Nov; 20(11):1405-12. PubMed ID: 24119353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Improved image quality in dual-energy abdominal CT: comparison of iterative reconstruction in image space and filtered back projection reconstruction.
Wang R; Yu W; Wu R; Yang H; Lu D; Liu J; Zhang Z; Zhang C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):402-6. PubMed ID: 22826403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The optimal dose reduction level using iterative reconstruction with prospective ECG-triggered coronary CTA using 256-slice MDCT.
Hou Y; Xu S; Guo W; Vembar M; Guo Q
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):3905-11. PubMed ID: 23036786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Contrast-Enhanced CT with Knowledge-Based Iterative Model Reconstruction for the Evaluation of Parotid Gland Tumors: A Feasibility Study.
Park CJ; Kim KW; Lee HJ; Kim MJ; Kim J
Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(5):957-964. PubMed ID: 30174486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V technique for radiation dose reduction in abdominal CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique.
Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Kim D; Cho J; Kim S; Lee S; Lee J
Br J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 88(1054):20150463. PubMed ID: 26234823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Hybrid iterative reconstruction technique for liver CT scans for image noise reduction and image quality improvement: evaluation of the optimal iterative reconstruction strengths.
Song JS; Lee JM; Sohn JY; Yoon JH; Han JK; Choi BI
Radiol Med; 2015 Mar; 120(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 25168773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. CT of the pancreas: comparison of image quality and pancreatic duct depiction among model-based iterative, adaptive statistical iterative, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
Lin XZ; Machida H; Tanaka I; Fukui R; Ueno E; Chen KM; Yan FH
Abdom Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 24496703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of Radiation Dose Reduction and Reconstruction Algorithm on Image Noise, Contrast, Resolution, and Detectability of Subtle Hypoattenuating Liver Lesions at Multidetector CT: Filtered Back Projection versus a Commercial Model-based Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm.
Solomon J; Marin D; Roy Choudhury K; Patel B; Samei E
Radiology; 2017 Sep; 284(3):777-787. PubMed ID: 28170300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Abdominal CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR): initial results of a prospective trial comparing ultralow-dose with standard-dose imaging.
Pickhardt PJ; Lubner MG; Kim DH; Tang J; Ruma JA; del Rio AM; Chen GH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Dec; 199(6):1266-74. PubMed ID: 23169718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Improvement of image quality at low-radiation dose and low-contrast material dose abdominal CT in patients with cirrhosis: intraindividual comparison of low tube voltage with iterative reconstruction algorithm and standard tube voltage.
Namimoto T; Oda S; Utsunomiya D; Shimonobo T; Morita S; Nakaura T; Yamashita Y
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(4):495-501. PubMed ID: 22805682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique.
Prakash P; Kalra MK; Kambadakone AK; Pien H; Hsieh J; Blake MA; Sahani DV
Invest Radiol; 2010 Apr; 45(4):202-10. PubMed ID: 20177389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
