35 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26182640)
1. The Legend score synthesizes Wells, PERC, Geneva, D-dimer and predicts acute pulmonary embolism prior to imaging tests.
Zhao Y; Cheng Y; Wang H; Du H; Sun J; Xu M; Luo Y; Liu S; Guo X; Xiong W
Pulmonology; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 37953212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The importance of clinical prediction models in non-fatal pulmonary embolism: an analysis of the best known clinical scores.
Ouatu A; Tănase DM; Ionescu SD; Rezuş C; Ambăruş V; Arsenescu-Georgescu C
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2014; 118(4):932-41. PubMed ID: 25581950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prevalence of venous thromboembolic events and diagnostic performance of the wells score and revised geneva scores for pulmonary embolism in patients with interstitial lung disease: a prospective study.
Luo Q; Xie J; Han Q; Tang C; Chen X; Wu L; Chen R
Heart Lung Circ; 2014 Aug; 23(8):778-85. PubMed ID: 24685075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Utility of the simplified Wells and revised Geneva scores to exclude pulmonary embolism in femur fracture patients.
Kim YJ; Choi DH; Lee ES; Ryoo SM; Ahn S; Sohn CH; Seo DW; Lim KS; Kim WY
Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Aug; 35(8):1131-1135. PubMed ID: 28390832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Values of the Wells and revised Geneva scores combined with D-dimer in diagnosing elderly pulmonary embolism patients.
Guo DJ; Zhao C; Zou YD; Huang XH; Hu JM; Guo L
Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 Apr; 128(8):1052-7. PubMed ID: 25881599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity and clinical utility of the simplified Wells rule for assessing clinical probability for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism.
Douma RA; Gibson NS; Gerdes VE; Büller HR; Wells PS; Perrier A; Le Gal G
Thromb Haemost; 2009 Jan; 101(1):197-200. PubMed ID: 19132208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The diagnostic and the exclusion scores for pulmonary embolism].
Junod A
Rev Med Suisse; 2015 May; 11(476):1204-9. PubMed ID: 26182640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effective diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary embolism: Improving patient outcomes.
Meyer G
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2014; 107(6-7):406-14. PubMed ID: 25023859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical decision rules for excluding pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis.
Lucassen W; Geersing GJ; Erkens PM; Reitsma JB; Moons KG; Büller H; van Weert HC
Ann Intern Med; 2011 Oct; 155(7):448-60. PubMed ID: 21969343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic prediction models for suspected pulmonary embolism: systematic review and independent external validation in primary care.
Hendriksen JM; Geersing GJ; Lucassen WA; Erkens PM; Stoffers HE; van Weert HC; Büller HR; Hoes AW; Moons KG
BMJ; 2015 Sep; 351():h4438. PubMed ID: 26349907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Different accuracies of rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent, turbidimetric, and agglutination D-dimer assays for thrombosis exclusion: impact on diagnostic work-ups of outpatients with suspected deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.
Michiels JJ; Gadisseur A; van der Planken M; Schroyens W; De Maeseneer M; Hermsen JT; Trienekens PH; Hoogsteden H; Pattynama PM
Semin Thromb Hemost; 2006 Oct; 32(7):678-93. PubMed ID: 17024595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rapid D-dimer assays to exclude deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: current status and new developments.
Janssen MC; Wollersheim H; Verbruggen B; Nováková IR
Semin Thromb Hemost; 1998; 24(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 9763357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
