These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26182857)

  • 1. Assessing the validity of two indirect questioning techniques: A Stochastic Lie Detector versus the Crosswise Model.
    Hoffmann A; Musch J
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):1032-46. PubMed ID: 26182857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An experimental validation method for questioning techniques that assess sensitive issues.
    Moshagen M; Hilbig BE; Erdfelder E; Moritz A
    Exp Psychol; 2014 Jan; 61(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 23948389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nothing but the truth? Effects of faking on the validity of the crosswise model.
    Hoffmann A; Meisters J; Musch J
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258603. PubMed ID: 34714838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Controlling social desirability bias: An experimental investigation of the extended crosswise model.
    Meisters J; Hoffmann A; Musch J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243384. PubMed ID: 33284820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A stochastic lie detector.
    Moshagen M; Musch J; Erdfelder E
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Mar; 44(1):222-31. PubMed ID: 21858604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. More is not always better: An experimental individual-level validation of the randomized response technique and the crosswise model.
    Höglinger M; Jann B
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0201770. PubMed ID: 30106973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the comprehensibility and perceived privacy protection of indirect questioning techniques.
    Hoffmann A; Waubert de Puiseau B; Schmidt AF; Musch J
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Aug; 49(4):1470-1483. PubMed ID: 27631988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can detailed instructions and comprehension checks increase the validity of crosswise model estimates?
    Meisters J; Hoffmann A; Musch J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0235403. PubMed ID: 32603352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Strong Validation of the Crosswise Model Using Experimentally-Induced Cheating Behavior.
    Hoffmann A; Diedenhofen B; Verschuere B; Musch J
    Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(6):403-14. PubMed ID: 27120562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the validity of non-randomized response techniques: an experimental comparison of the crosswise model and the triangular model.
    Hoffmann A; Meisters J; Musch J
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Aug; 52(4):1768-1782. PubMed ID: 32185638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensitivity of Crosswise Model to Simplistic Selection of Nonsensitive Questions: An Application to Estimate Substance Use, Alcohol Consumption and Extramarital Sex Among Iranian College Students.
    Safiri S; Rahimi-Movaghar A; Mansournia MA; Yunesian M; Shamsipour M; Sadeghi-Bazargani H; Fotouhi A
    Subst Use Misuse; 2019; 54(4):601-611. PubMed ID: 30595063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. More than random responding: Empirical evidence for the validity of the (Extended) Crosswise Model.
    Meisters J; Hoffmann A; Musch J
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Feb; 55(2):716-729. PubMed ID: 35449499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do they really wash their hands? Prevalence estimates for personal hygiene behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic based on indirect questions.
    Mieth L; Mayer MM; Hoffmann A; Buchner A; Bell R
    BMC Public Health; 2021 Jan; 21(1):12. PubMed ID: 33397344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detecting nonadherence without loss in efficiency: A simple extension of the crosswise model.
    Heck DW; Hoffmann A; Moshagen M
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Oct; 50(5):1895-1905. PubMed ID: 28916924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimates of Lifetime Extradyadic Sex Using a Hybrid of Randomized Response Technique and Crosswise Design.
    Tu SH; Hsieh SH
    Arch Sex Behav; 2017 Feb; 46(2):373-384. PubMed ID: 27164895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental validation of specialized questioning techniques in conservation.
    Ibbett H; Dorward L; Dwiyahreni AA; Jones JPG; Kaduma J; Kohi EM; Mchomvu J; Prayitno K; Sabiladiyni H; Sankeni S; Saputra AW; Supriatna J; St John FAV
    Conserv Biol; 2022 Oct; 36(5):e13908. PubMed ID: 35288991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating the prevalence of negative attitudes towards people with disability: a comparison of direct questioning, projective questioning and randomised response.
    Ostapczuk M; Musch J
    Disabil Rehabil; 2011; 33(5):399-411. PubMed ID: 20524926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Examining conservation compliance with randomized response technique analyses.
    Chang CH; Cruyff MJLF; Giam X
    Conserv Biol; 2018 Dec; 32(6):1448-1456. PubMed ID: 29752832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reducing socially desirable responses in epidemiologic surveys: an extension of the randomized-response technique.
    Moshagen M; Musch J; Ostapczuk M; Zhao Z
    Epidemiology; 2010 May; 21(3):379-82. PubMed ID: 20386172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are Sex Effects on Ethical Decision-Making Fake or Real? A Meta-Analysis on the Contaminating Role of Social Desirability Response Bias.
    Yang J; Ming X; Wang Z; Adams SM
    Psychol Rep; 2017 Feb; 120(1):25-48. PubMed ID: 28558528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.