These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26183024)

  • 1. Judging the implications of a concession: Conversational distance and belief bias effects.
    Ricco RB; Sierra A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(6):1129-44. PubMed ID: 26183024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using forced choice to test belief bias in syllogistic reasoning.
    Trippas D; Verde MF; Handley SJ
    Cognition; 2014 Dec; 133(3):586-600. PubMed ID: 25218460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Logic, beliefs, and instruction: a test of the default interventionist account of belief bias.
    Handley SJ; Newstead SE; Trippas D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):28-43. PubMed ID: 21058879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual differences in working memory capacity and resistance to belief bias in syllogistic reasoning.
    Robison MK; Unsworth N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1471-1484. PubMed ID: 27173000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The logic-bias effect: The role of effortful processing in the resolution of belief-logic conflict.
    Howarth S; Handley SJ; Walsh C
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):330-49. PubMed ID: 26390872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Logic and belief across the lifespan: the rise and fall of belief inhibition during syllogistic reasoning.
    De Neys W; Van Gelder E
    Dev Sci; 2009 Jan; 12(1):123-30. PubMed ID: 19120420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why is logic so likeable? A single-process account of argument evaluation with logic and liking judgments.
    Hayes BK; Wei P; Dunn JC; Stephens RG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(4):699-719. PubMed ID: 31343253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The SDT model of belief bias: complexity, time, and cognitive ability mediate the effects of believability.
    Trippas D; Handley SJ; Verde MF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1393-402. PubMed ID: 23565791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Belief inhibition during thinking: not always winning but at least taking part.
    De Neys W; Franssens S
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):45-61. PubMed ID: 19703685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The neural correlates of belief-bias inhibition: the impact of logic training.
    Luo J; Tang X; Zhang E; Stupple EJ
    Biol Psychol; 2014 Dec; 103():276-82. PubMed ID: 25263609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The rationality of informal argumentation: a Bayesian approach to reasoning fallacies.
    Hahn U; Oaksford M
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):704-32. PubMed ID: 17638503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Negative valence can evoke a liberal response bias in syllogistic reasoning.
    Vartanian O; Nakashima A; Bouak F; Smith I; Baranski JV; Cheung B
    Cogn Process; 2013 Mar; 14(1):89-98. PubMed ID: 23011642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cognitive control in belief-laden reasoning during conclusion processing: an ERP study.
    Luo J; Liu X; Stupple EJ; Zhang E; Xiao X; Jia L; Yang Q; Li H; Zhang Q
    Int J Psychol; 2013; 48(3):224-31. PubMed ID: 22721259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Thinking while talking: adults fail nonverbal false-belief reasoning.
    Newton AM; de Villiers JG
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Jul; 18(7):574-9. PubMed ID: 17614864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reasoning under time pressure. A study of causal conditional inference.
    Evans JS; Handley SJ; Bacon AM
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 19261582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of cognitive ability and instructional set on causal conditional inference.
    Evans JS; Handley SJ; Neilens H; Over D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):892-909. PubMed ID: 19728225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Highly reflective reasoners show no signs of belief inhibition.
    Svedholm-Häkkinen AM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jan; 154():69-76. PubMed ID: 25499057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural correlates of the belief-bias effect in syllogistic reasoning: an event-related potential study.
    Luo J; Yuan J; Qiu J; Zhang Q; Zhong J; Huai Z
    Neuroreport; 2008 Jul; 19(10):1073-8. PubMed ID: 18580582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Individual differences in commitment to value-based beliefs and the amplification of perceived belief dissimilarity effects.
    Maxwell-Smith MA; Seligman C; Conway P; Cheung I
    J Pers; 2015 Apr; 83(2):127-41. PubMed ID: 24444458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discounting testimony with the argument ad hominem and a Bayesian congruent prior model.
    Bhatia JS; Oaksford M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Sep; 41(5):1548-59. PubMed ID: 26147667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.