BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26183047)

  • 1. Bone-anchored hearing aids are effective and associated with a high degree of satisfaction.
    Gardell IS; Andresen K; Faber CE; Wanscher JH
    Dan Med J; 2015 Jul; 62(7):. PubMed ID: 26183047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient satisfaction and functional results with the bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA).
    Saroul N; Gilain L; Montalban A; Giraudet F; Avan P; Mom T
    Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis; 2011 Jun; 128(3):107-13. PubMed ID: 21601551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient satisfaction with the bone-anchored hearing aid: a 14-year experience.
    Badran K; Bunstone D; Arya AK; Suryanarayanan R; Mackinnon N
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):659-66. PubMed ID: 16868513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term results with the titanium bone-anchored hearing aid: the U.S. experience.
    Wazen JJ; Caruso M; Tjellstrom A
    Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):737-41. PubMed ID: 9831146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid: patient satisfaction with the Cordelle device.
    Ho EC; Monksfield P; Egan E; Reid A; Proops D
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):793-9. PubMed ID: 19623095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Day to day use and service-related issues with the bone-anchored hearing aid: the Entific Medical Systems questionnaire.
    Dutt SN; McDermott AL; Jelbert A; Reid AP; Proops DW
    J Laryngol Otol Suppl; 2002; (28):20-8. PubMed ID: 12138788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age-related use and benefit of the bone-anchored hearing aid compact.
    de Wolf MJ; Leijendeckers JM; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF; Cremers CW
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):787-92. PubMed ID: 19638942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of long-term patient satisfaction and experience with the Baha® bone conduction implant.
    Rasmussen J; Olsen SØ; Nielsen LH
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Mar; 51(3):194-9. PubMed ID: 22133063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. UK and Ireland experience of bone anchored hearing aids (BAHA) in individuals with Down syndrome.
    Sheehan PZ; Hans PS
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 70(6):981-6. PubMed ID: 16310862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Glasgow benefit inventory in the evaluation of patient satisfaction with the bone-anchored hearing aid: quality of life issues.
    Dutt SN; McDermott AL; Jelbert A; Reid AP; Proops DW
    J Laryngol Otol Suppl; 2002; (28):7-14. PubMed ID: 12138792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient satisfaction with bilateral bone-anchored hearing aids: the Birmingham experience.
    Dutt SN; McDermott AL; Burrell SP; Cooper HR; Reid AP; Proops DW
    J Laryngol Otol Suppl; 2002; (28):37-46. PubMed ID: 12138790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of bone anchored hearing aids in children with Down syndrome.
    McDermott AL; Williams J; Kuo MJ; Reid AP; Proops DW
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 72(6):751-7. PubMed ID: 18433885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bone-anchored hearing aids in conductive and mixed hearing losses: why do patients reject them?
    Siau RT; Dhillon B; Siau D; Green KM
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Oct; 273(10):3117-22. PubMed ID: 26894416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The bone-anchored hearing aid: quality-of-life assessment.
    Hol MK; Spath MA; Krabbe PF; van der Pouw CT; Snik AF; Cremers CW; Mylanus EA
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Apr; 130(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 15096420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patients' opinions of bone-anchored vs conventional hearing aids.
    Mylanus EA; Snik AF; Cremers CW
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1995 Apr; 121(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 7702816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Efficacy in patients with outer and middle ear deformities of using bone-anchored hearing aids].
    FAN Y; CHEN XW; YANG H; ZHANG ZY; ZHU XL; CAO KL; GAO ZQ
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 47(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22800340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An intra-individual comparison of the previous conventional hearing aid with the bone-anchored hearing aid: The Nijmegen group questionnaire.
    McDermott AL; Dutt SN; Reid AP; Proops DW
    J Laryngol Otol Suppl; 2002; (28):15-9. PubMed ID: 12138786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bilateral Bone-anchored Hearing Aid: impact on quality of life measured with the Glasgow Benefit Inventory.
    Ho EC; Monksfield P; Egan E; Reid A; Proops D
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):891-6. PubMed ID: 19692937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Bone anchored hearing aid (BAHA): clinical evaluation].
    Jankowski R; Pialoux R; Labaeye P; Simon C
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1998 Dec; 115(6):315-20. PubMed ID: 9922827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Latent demand for the bone-anchored hearing aid: the Lippy Group experience.
    Burkey JM; Berenholz LP; Lippy WH;
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):648-52. PubMed ID: 16868512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.