246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26183275)
1. [Technical democracy in the country of direct democracy: Switzerland and the debate on life sciences].
Kaufmann A
Med Sci (Paris); 2015; 31 Spec No 2():27-31. PubMed ID: 26183275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Debating the life sciences--US experiences.
Hilgartner S
Med Sci (Paris); 2015; 31 Spec No 2():24-6. PubMed ID: 26183274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Discussion.
Bony S; Fellous M; Kaufmann A; Duprat S; Hilgartner S; la salle D; Guivant J
Med Sci (Paris); 2015; 31 Spec No 2():31-2. PubMed ID: 26292375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Why scientific details are important when novel technologies encounter law, politics, and ethics.
Goldstein L
J Law Med Ethics; 2010; 38(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 20579243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [How to make useful the public debates].
Callon M
Med Sci (Paris); 2015; 31 Spec No 2():13-4. PubMed ID: 26183271
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Introduction].
Joly PB
Med Sci (Paris); 2015; 31 Spec No 2():11-2. PubMed ID: 26183270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Technologies of democracy: experiments and demonstrations.
Laurent B
Sci Eng Ethics; 2011 Dec; 17(4):649-66. PubMed ID: 21853368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence-based arguments in direct democracy: The case of smoking bans in Switzerland.
Stucki I
Eval Program Plann; 2018 Aug; 69():148-156. PubMed ID: 27612844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Science and democracy, a rough union].
Kiefer B
Rev Med Suisse; 2012 Sep; 8(355):1848. PubMed ID: 23097874
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Session 4. What dialog for science and society? Ideas for the future (round table)].
de Brem P; Huet S; Laurent B; Larqué L; Blondiaux L
Med Sci (Paris); 2015; 31 Spec No 2():46-53. PubMed ID: 26183279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Of embryos and empire.
Cohen E
New Atlantis; 2003; (2):3-16. PubMed ID: 15584196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Popularizing dissent: A civil society perspective.
Motion J; Leitch S; Weaver CK
Public Underst Sci; 2015 May; 24(4):496-510. PubMed ID: 25394361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Myanmar's democracy and health on life support.
The Lancet
Lancet; 2021 Mar; 397(10279):1035. PubMed ID: 33743852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Functional dynamics of living systems and genetic engineering.
Buiatti M
Riv Biol; 2004; 97(3):379-408. PubMed ID: 15754592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Why conservatives care about biotechnology.
Wolfson A
New Atlantis; 2003; (2):55-64. PubMed ID: 15584197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Not Available].
Byk C; Masello S
J Int Bioethique Ethique Sci; 2021 Feb; 31(4):57-65. PubMed ID: 33728878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The sugar industry, political authorities, and scientific institutions in the regulation of saccharin: Valencia (1888-1939).
Guillem-Llobat X
Ann Sci; 2011 Jul; 68(3):401-24. PubMed ID: 21999094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Execution of prisoners with mental illnesses in Japan.
Lancet; 2009 Sep; 374(9693):852. PubMed ID: 19748382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Direct democracy and bioethical choices: voting life and death at the ballot box.
Daar JF
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1995; 28(4):799-859. PubMed ID: 16506328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The democratic side of science-fiction].
Lecellier CH
Med Sci (Paris); 2011 Apr; 27(4):433-8. PubMed ID: 21524410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
