These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26183472)

  • 1. Activity intensity, assistive devices and joint replacement influence predicted remodelling in the proximal femur.
    Dickinson AS
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2016 Feb; 15(1):181-94. PubMed ID: 26183472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Activity and loading influence the predicted bone remodeling around cemented hip replacements.
    Dickinson AS
    J Biomech Eng; 2014 Apr; 136(4):. PubMed ID: 24337038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head.
    Gupta S; New AM; Taylor M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jul; 21(6):594-602. PubMed ID: 16542761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Strain adaptive bone remodelling: influence of the implantation technique.
    Behrens BA; Bouguecha A; Nolte I; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Pressel T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 133():33-44. PubMed ID: 18376011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of muscle loading on the simulation of bone remodelling in the proximal femur.
    Bitsakos C; Kerner J; Fisher I; Amis AA
    J Biomech; 2005 Jan; 38(1):133-9. PubMed ID: 15519348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Is there a bone-preserving bone remodelling in short-stem prosthesis? DEXA analysis with the Nanos total hip arthroplasty].
    Götze C; Ehrenbrink J; Ehrenbrink H
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Aug; 148(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 20714981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Numerical evaluation of bone remodelling and adaptation considering different hip prosthesis designs.
    Levadnyi I; Awrejcewicz J; Gubaua JE; Pereira JT
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Dec; 50():122-129. PubMed ID: 29100185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Orthotropic bone remodelling around uncemented femoral implant: a comparison with isotropic formulation.
    Mathai B; Dhara S; Gupta S
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2021 Jun; 20(3):1115-1134. PubMed ID: 33768358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of periprosthetic bone remodelling after implantation of anatomic and straight stem prostheses in total hip arthroplasty.
    Grochola LF; Habermann B; Mastrodomenico N; Kurth A
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Apr; 128(4):383-92. PubMed ID: 18038142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A numerical study of failure mechanisms in the cemented resurfaced femur: effects of interface characteristics and bone remodelling.
    Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 May; 223(4):471-84. PubMed ID: 19499837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early periprosthetic bone remodelling around cemented and uncemented custom-made femoral components and their uncemented acetabular cups.
    Mulier M; Jaecques SV; Raaijmaakers M; Nijs J; Van der Perre G; Jonkers I
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2011 Jul; 131(7):941-8. PubMed ID: 21246378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bone remodelling of a proximal femur with the thrust plate prosthesis: an in vitro case.
    Taylor WR; Ploeg H; Hertig D; Warner MD; Clift SE
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2004 Jun; 7(3):131-7. PubMed ID: 15512756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implant-bone interface healing and adaptation in resurfacing hip replacement.
    Dickinson A; Taylor A; Browne M
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2012; 15(9):935-47. PubMed ID: 21547786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Numeric simulation of bone remodelling patterns after implantation of a cementless straight stem.
    Lerch M; Windhagen H; Stukenborg-Colsman CM; Kurtz A; Behrens BA; Almohallami A; Bouguecha A
    Int Orthop; 2013 Dec; 37(12):2351-6. PubMed ID: 23995334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanics of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Ong KL; Kurtz SM; Manley MT; Rushton N; Mohammed NA; Field RE
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Aug; 88(8):1110-5. PubMed ID: 16877617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bone preserving level of osteotomy in short-stem total hip arthroplasty does not influence stress shielding dimensions - a comparing finite elements analysis.
    Burchard R; Braas S; Soost C; Graw JA; Schmitt J
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Aug; 18(1):343. PubMed ID: 28784121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bone remodelling in the proximal femur after Charnley total hip arthroplasty.
    Cohen B; Rushton N
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1995 Sep; 77(5):815-9. PubMed ID: 7559717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of ingrowth regions on bone remodelling around a cementless hip resurfacing femoral implant.
    Haider IT; Speirs AD; Beaulé PE; Frei H
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2015; 18(12):1349-57. PubMed ID: 24697332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of proximal femoral support in stress development within hip prostheses.
    Crowninshield RD; Maloney WJ; Wentz DH; Levine DL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Mar; (420):176-80. PubMed ID: 15057094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlation between pre-operative periprosthetic bone density and post-operative bone loss in THA can be explained by strain-adaptive remodelling.
    Kerner J; Huiskes R; van Lenthe GH; Weinans H; van Rietbergen B; Engh CA; Amis AA
    J Biomech; 1999 Jul; 32(7):695-703. PubMed ID: 10400357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.