BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26183518)

  • 1. Accuracy of a Tablet Audiometer for Measuring Behavioral Hearing Thresholds in a Clinical Population.
    Thompson GP; Sladen DP; Borst BJ; Still OL
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Nov; 153(5):838-42. PubMed ID: 26183518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Self-administered hearing loss screening using an interactive, tablet play audiometer with ear bud headphones.
    Yeung JC; Heley S; Beauregard Y; Champagne S; Bromwich MA
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Aug; 79(8):1248-52. PubMed ID: 26055197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ambient noise impact on accuracy of automated hearing assessment.
    Storey KK; Muñoz K; Nelson L; Larsen J; White K
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Oct; 53(10):730-6. PubMed ID: 24909592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adult validation of a self-administered tablet audiometer.
    Bastianelli M; Mark AE; McAfee A; Schramm D; Lefrançois R; Bromwich M
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Nov; 48(1):59. PubMed ID: 31699157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical validation of the AMTAS automated audiometer.
    Eikelboom RH; Swanepoel de W; Motakef S; Upson GS
    Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 23548148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tablet-based Screening for Hearing Loss: Feasibility of Testing in Nonspecialty Locations.
    Kelly EA; Stadler ME; Nelson S; Runge CL; Friedland DR
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Apr; 39(4):410-416. PubMed ID: 29494473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development and evaluation of a tablet-based diagnostic audiometer.
    Thoidis I; Vrysis L; Markou K; Papanikolaou G
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Aug; 58(8):476-483. PubMed ID: 30987489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity of diagnostic pure-tone audiometry without a sound-treated environment in older adults.
    Maclennan-Smith F; Swanepoel de W; Hall JW
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Feb; 52(2):66-73. PubMed ID: 23140522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tablet Audiometry in Canada's North: A Portable and Efficient Method for Hearing Screening.
    Rourke R; Kong DC; Bromwich M
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Sep; 155(3):473-8. PubMed ID: 27118819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of Mobile-Based Audiometry in the Evaluation of Hearing Loss in Quiet and Noisy Environments.
    Saliba J; Al-Reefi M; Carriere JS; Verma N; Provencal C; Rappaport JM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Apr; 156(4):706-711. PubMed ID: 28025906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of the Home Hearing Test: Implications for Public Health.
    Mosley CL; Langley LM; Davis A; McMahon CM; Tremblay KL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):208-216. PubMed ID: 30461396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Smartphone hearing screening with integrated quality control and data management.
    Swanepoel de W; Myburgh HC; Howe DM; Mahomed F; Eikelboom RH
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Dec; 53(12):841-9. PubMed ID: 24998412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Smartphone threshold audiometry in underserved primary health-care contexts.
    Sandström J; Swanepoel de W; Carel Myburgh H; Laurent C
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 26795898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. OtoID: new extended frequency, portable audiometer for ototoxicity monitoring.
    Dille MF; Jacobs PG; Gordon SY; Helt WJ; McMillan GP
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013; 50(7):997-1006. PubMed ID: 24301436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tablet-based Hearing Screening in Children Aged 5 to 17 in Rural Dominican Republic.
    Levy DA; Hill DR; Bia FJ; Feinn RS
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Aug; 39(7):823-828. PubMed ID: 29995002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical validation of automated audiometry with continuous noise-monitoring in a clinically heterogeneous population outside a sound-treated environment.
    Brennan-Jones CG; Eikelboom RH; Swanepoel de W; Friedland PL; Atlas MD
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Sep; 55(9):507-13. PubMed ID: 27206551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High-frequency pure-tone audiometry in children: a test-retest reliability study relative to ototoxic criteria.
    Beahan N; Kei J; Driscoll C; Charles B; Khan A
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 21760512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extended High-Frequency Smartphone Audiometry: Validity and Reliability.
    Bornman M; Swanepoel W; De Jager LB; Eikelboom RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):217-226. PubMed ID: 30461416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
    Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Freeston K; Zhou D; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.