119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26183752)
1. Evaluation of a Self-Test Device Used in Allergic Contact Dermatitis.
Elsner P; Bjarnøe H; Aberer W; Brasch J
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2015; 28(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 26183752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Late reactions to the patch-test preparations para-phenylenediamine and epoxy resin: a prospective multicentre investigation of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
Hillen U; Jappe U; Frosch PJ; Becker D; Brasch J; Lilie M; Fuchs T; Kreft B; Pirker C; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2006 Apr; 154(4):665-70. PubMed ID: 16536809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Positive patch test reactions to nickel sulphate are not modified by neighbouring negative fragrance patch tests. A multicenter-study by the German contact dermatitis research group.
Brasch J; Weichenthal M; Szliska C; Löffler H; Koch P; Grabbe J; Mahler V; Kreilgård B; Hoeck U;
Acta Derm Venereol; 2006; 86(4):345-7. PubMed ID: 16874422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Epicutaneous patch test results in children and adults with allergic contact dermatitis in Karlovac county: a retrospective survey.
Kuljanac I; Knežević E; Cvitanović H
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2011; 19(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 21703155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Path test reactions to the Chinese Standard Screening Allergens in 1,135 patients investigated for allergic contact dermatitis.
Liu YQ; Zhao B; Zhuang LH; Fan WX
Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 9249281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cutaneous delayed-type hypersensitivity in patients with atopic dermatitis.
Malajian D; Belsito DV
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2013 Aug; 69(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 23583066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Strong allergic patch test reactions may indicate a general disposition for contact allergy.
Brasch J; Schnuch A; Uter W;
Allergy; 2006 Mar; 61(3):364-9. PubMed ID: 16436147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of self-testing as a method to estimate the prevalence of nickel allergy.
Josefson A; Svensson A; Färm G; Engfeldt M; Meding B
Acta Derm Venereol; 2011 Sep; 91(5):526-30. PubMed ID: 21874219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patch-testing North American lip dermatitis patients: data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 2001 to 2004.
Zug KA; Kornik R; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Rietschel RL; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Warshaw EM;
Dermatitis; 2008; 19(4):202-8. PubMed ID: 18674455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A multi-center, retrospective review of patch testing for contact dermatitis in allergy practices.
Camacho-Halili M; Axelrod S; Michelis MA; Lighvani S; Khan F; Leon S; Aquino MR; Davis-Lorton M; Fonacier LS
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2011 Dec; 107(6):487-92. PubMed ID: 22123377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patch test results with metals and meteorological conditions.
Hegewald J; Uter W; Kranke B; Schnuch A; Gefeller O; Pfahlberg A
Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2008; 147(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 18594154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patch testing: what allergists should know.
White JM
Clin Exp Allergy; 2012 Feb; 42(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 22092850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Allergic contact dermatitis: patch testing results at Mount Sinai Medical Center.
Yoo JY; Al Naami M; Markowitz O; Hadi SM
Skinmed; 2010; 8(5):257-60. PubMed ID: 21137633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 2001-2002 study period.
Pratt MD; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Fransway AF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Rietschel RL; Sasseville D; Sherertz EF; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Zug K
Dermatitis; 2004 Dec; 15(4):176-83. PubMed ID: 15842061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix - reactivity to the individual constituents and chemical detection in relevant cosmetic products.
Frosch PJ; Rastogi SC; Pirker C; Brinkmeier T; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Svedman C; Goossens A; White IR; Uter W; Arnau EG; Lepoittevin JP; Johansen JD; Menne T
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):216-25. PubMed ID: 15859994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Epicutaneous testing (patch testing)].
Holm JO; Thune P
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1993 Apr; 113(11):1361-2. PubMed ID: 8337626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Delayed patch test reading after 5 days: the Mayo Clinic experience.
Davis MD; Bhate K; Rohlinger AL; Farmer SA; Richardson DM; Weaver AL
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Aug; 59(2):225-33. PubMed ID: 18513826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Safety and efficacy evaluation of TRUE TEST panels 1.1, 2.1, and 3.1 in children and adolescents.
Jacob SE; Herro EM; Sullivan K; Matiz C; Eichenfield L; Hamann C
Dermatitis; 2011; 22(4):204-10. PubMed ID: 21781636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
